You know what’s a bigger threat to the country than economic downturn? Division. The number one issue in this country at the moment is division. I voted to remain, but the idea that you give people a vote and then drop the “it was only advisory” BS because you don’t like the result is utterly absurd. And the people pushing for it are as unreasonable and toxic as the ultra-wing of Brexiters they claim to abhor. They have no interest in trying to unify the country whatsoever. It’s f*** the implications, civil unrest & taking a democratically appointed decision away from millions of people - reverse Brexit or go to hell.

And for those reasons alone, if there was another EU referendum tomorrow, I’d vote to leave.

Not to stand with the disaster capitalists or the Dickheads who blame all the countries problems on immigrants. But to stand for democracy.

We're the Arthur over ere!

It didn’t peak in 2016 at all. But there was a vote. The largest in British history. People voted to leave the European Union. We need to leave the European Union, it’s as simple as that. Think of the implications of reversing the result of that for millions of people. There would be civil disobedience and you are very very naive to think that the result would be any different in a second referendum.

Since day one in the Brexit debate. There have been 2 wings that have been focused on entirely. The ultra remainers & ultra leavers. Both are as unreasonable, toxic and dishonest as eachother. It’s nothing other than tribalism. The reality is that in the majority. There are a lot of decent people stuck in the middle who voted both remain and leave. But could recognise fully the legitimacy of the other sides arguments. We now hear from the 2nd referendum campaigners about all those poor leave voters who were unsure and would now vote differently. We NEVER hear about the other side: remainers who could’ve easily voted leave in the first place and would vote differently in another referendum. I happen to be one of them.

The job for any government now is to implement the result of the referendum whilst attempting to secure the best possible outcome for as close to 100% of people as possible. Trying to reverse Brexit before we’ve even left would be a cynical undermining of democracy. I literally cannot believe anyone would argue that it wouldn’t be just because it suits their side of the argument and what they personally think will be best.

Principles *should* ALWAYS trump personal political positions. But I’m starting to see a side of the ultra wing of remainers I refer to, that would suggest they have none whatsoever.

We're the Arthur over ere!

Why not have a 'soft' leave and then have another referendum in a few years time to see if that is enough, too much or just right and then take the appropriate action based on that vote.

'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

I disagree. The result may well be exactly the same, but I can't see why affirming this would be any sort of perversion of democracy. There has been sufficient gap and significant changes in people's understanding of the issues. The Irish border for instance was barely mentioned in the run up to the referendum. There are plenty of other factors that were also not spoken about or misrepresented by both sides.

Also the amount of red tape created by Brexit is staggering. I understood from the leave campaign there would be less, but reading these no deal technical notices it's clear there would be swathes of additional bureaucracy created by Brexit.

Given the Irish border issue I still believe the choice will end up being BINO or no Brexit as the ERG proposals don't work, Chequers doesn't work and the Tories have promised no Irish sea border and maintaining the same conditions in NI and rUK. This means soft soft Brexit without the existence Unicorn technology.

What is the point of a second referendum?
Why ask unqualified people to vote about details? How will this improve anything?
It's all political games nonsense and you know it.
If you are suggesting that we have another in/out vote, you can take it and shove it up Jeremy Corbyn's commie arse.

But Cambridge does.
I care not one jot what Corbyn or his shambles of a party claims to want. They are desperate to come up with a strategy to win the next election but are straddled across the fence on Brexit. If they support a second referendum they are screwed and if Corbyn remains leader they are screwed. I can't believe that the British public would vote for such a shambolic, far left infiltrated party even with the shower of s***e we currently have.

Booo!

We know why Remainers want another referendum. Because they lost the first one. It's pathetic.
Voting on the deal is equally ridiculous. How will that improve anything? Answer, it won't.

Leaving the EU is the next step in the tories continuing obsession with Europe.

After next March they will be even more consumed by it than before.

It is the hundred years war, we are 10 years in.

But you want a definite 'out' of the EU next March, which you are not going to get, the Tory EU paranoia will consume them, and therefore us, ad infinitum.

Classy.
Why is everything an absolute with you? I'm sure politicians tell the truth when it suits them but politics is about being economical with the truth.

Are we really having this conversation?