This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
hi dan,have you enquired about 3rd party residence after march next year. Edited by lloydy (05 Oct 2018 11.42am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by lloydy
hi dan,have you enquired about 3rd party residence after march next year. Edited by lloydy (05 Oct 2018 11.42am) Right now you can pay to become a slovak citizen which is what I'm going to do after Monday, I think its circa 700eur you get a discount for being an entrepreneur (running and owning B&B) which reduces that figure quite a bit. I think everyone is winging it a bit come march so we'll see.
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
|
Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
Right now you can pay to become a slovak citizen which is what I'm going to do after Monday, I think its circa 700eur you get a discount for being an entrepreneur (running and owning B&B) which reduces that figure quite a bit. I think everyone is winging it a bit come march so we'll see.
You're leaving the sinking ship early when really we need those who realise the ship is holed.....but I can't blame you....here's to your success! Edited by Stirlingsays (05 Oct 2018 3.07pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I am so looking forward to proper devolution, Surrey leaving England could be called Sexit or Suxit. Stop those damned Essex people working across the border in Kent (Kexoff) and Surrey. I never voted for Essex MPs, why should they have a say in Croydon life? Wolves supporters having to get visas for South East London. I say hand the power back to the people, I am considering moving to Tooting. I was born in England and I never voted to join a European superstate. I'm just returning to where I started. The EU will only go one way if it prevails. Do you actually think that more people being rules by less is a better situation? How do you think that will affect a satellite region like Britain? How much more corruptible will the decision makers be?
|
|
|
As Shakespeare would have put it:- Exit, pursued by a bear.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Look at the EU now....desperate to keep a Johnson government out which would have a real Brexit....... now they are full of 'positive' noises. Totally desperate to secure their 40 Billion and keep the soft underbelly of the Tory party in negotiations. Shows up the remainers with all that tough EU talk for what it was. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Oct 2018 10.16am) A little early to draw firm conclusions, wouldn’t you say?
Vive le Roy! |
|
|
Originally posted by the.universal
A little early to draw firm conclusions, wouldn’t you say? That's never stopped me before.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| pefwin |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I am so looking forward to proper devolution, Surrey leaving England could be called Sexit or Suxit. Stop those damned Essex people working across the border in Kent (Kexoff) and Surrey. I never voted for Essex MPs, why should they have a say in Croydon life? Wolves supporters having to get visas for South East London. I say hand the power back to the people, I am considering moving to Tooting. There was/is a campaign for a totally independent London, hopefully within the EU, leaving the rest of England in the s***
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by pefwin
There was/is a campaign for a totally independent London, hopefully within the EU, leaving the rest of England in the s*** We've had it for decades tbf, it's called The City of London.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
We are told youngsters can't get on the housing ladder and deposits are huge to buy. If a higher % goes to rent/deposit and mortgage because of huge migration needing houses what has the point to the British public? Business benefits but not the normal person. Housing % has ridden hugely more than wages, I just don't see what the point has been? Any youngsters here who voted remain who can't get a house? Edited by dannyboy1978 (08 Oct 2018 7.59am) I don't think youngsters are as nationalistic as older generations. Although I was born in 69, the Second World War still loomed large in the background featuring in comics and on the TV etc. My generation were far more queen and country than today's (rightly or wrongly) You are correct regarding housing however I don't think many youngsters correlate the link between open door migration and high housing.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I can't decide if this is a conspiracy by Remainers of all parties and those that really run things, to subvert democracy. I always suspected that they would try and get their way no matter what the vote.
To 'subvert democracy' you have to be in one to start with! No more referendums please, and especially democracy. Britains problems are the result of voters. The question here simply should never have been asked in the first place, the government, no matter how few voted for it (less than 30%) is there constitutionally to govern, not to ask the population what they think they should do.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
We are told youngsters can't get on the housing ladder and deposits are huge to buy. If a higher % goes to rent/deposit and mortgage because of huge migration needing houses what has the point to the British public? Business benefits but not the normal person. Housing % has ridden hugely more than wages, I just don't see what the point has been? Any youngsters here who voted remain who can't get a house? Edited by dannyboy1978 (08 Oct 2018 7.59am) To simply blame immigration for the cost of housing is far too simplistic and arrives at the wrong conclusions. For real insight into the issue you should start at the fundamentals of house building. For house builders, in simple terms, if you have more demand for housing the prices will go up so they will build more homes and this in turn increases supply bring the price back into equilibrium. The housing market though is inefficient, and the planning system creates huge difficulties and additional (inefficient) costs. There is also the issue that the majority of voters in older generations have been influencing policy and planning through NIMBYism and a desire to increase the value of their homes. These two factors flow through to governments who are incentivised to restrict the supply of housing.
The real policy solution should be to overhaul the planning system and to fund more housing, plus invest in infrastructure and jobs, especially in the regions and incentivise businesses and people to relocate from London. The last 10 years have seen inaction from government on this, merely trialing policies that simply push prices up and make matters worse.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
To simply blame immigration for the cost of housing is far too simplistic and arrives at the wrong conclusions. For real insight into the issue you should start at the fundamentals of house building. For house builders, in simple terms, if you have more demand for housing the prices will go up so they will build more homes and this in turn increases supply bring the price back into equilibrium. The housing market though is inefficient, and the planning system creates huge difficulties and additional (inefficient) costs. There is also the issue that the majority of voters in older generations have been influencing policy and planning through NIMBYism and a desire to increase the value of their homes. These two factors flow through to governments who are incentivised to restrict the supply of housing.
The real policy solution should be to overhaul the planning system and to fund more housing, plus invest in infrastructure and jobs, especially in the regions and incentivise businesses and people to relocate from London. The last 10 years have seen inaction from government on this, merely trialing policies that simply push prices up and make matters worse. I think your missing my point. Why do we want busier roads, more pollution And yes if we increase the population we will need nurses so stop increasing the population. I bet all these liberals who love open borders are the first to moan about building on the green belt or pollution from more cars in cities. And don't forget automatization is around the corner!! So all in all these youngsters voting to remain have not got a clue.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
To 'subvert democracy' you have to be in one to start with! No more referendums please, and especially democracy. Britains problems are the result of voters. The question here simply should never have been asked in the first place, the government, no matter how few voted for it (less than 30%) is there constitutionally to govern, not to ask the population what they think they should do.
You want to get into a debate about what democracy is? I know you would prefer a totalitarian communist government, but we voted for Leave just the same as we vote to decide a government and no one complains except the losers. It ain't a perfect system but we regularly ask stupid people who should be Prime Minister and I'm sure you would be happy if stupid people voted in Jeremy next time.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.