This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Don’t count on that. The government are about to ban all large gatherings everywhere. The premier league has just acted in advanced of that because playing squads and management teams have caught the virus. And then it’s not about contracting the virus but stretching and availability of emergency services. Police must be gutted their easy overtime shifts might be lost. My point is the government hadn't banned large gatherings when the football was suspended. It was only because Arteta & Hudson-Odoi contracted the virus and a few other players self-isolated at Leicester etc. If games had been played this weekend and maybe next surely it would make it easier to finish the season over the Summer.
|
|
|
Originally posted by rollercoaster
My point is the government hadn't banned large gatherings when the football was suspended. It was only because Arteta & Hudson-Odoi contracted the virus and a few other players self-isolated at Leicester etc. If games had been played this weekend and maybe next surely it would make it easier to finish the season over the Summer. Then it was Leicester players, Everton players, Watford players, which could keep happening. Even before that there should have been no hospitality, no mixing players with anyone. No fans, opposition owners. Nobody. This was achievable. It happened at Blackburn when they got changed down the road when the ground was being redeveloped. Could be done everywhere with showering and changing in the stadiums.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
No we aren't. We are unsecured creditors of Manchester United
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
No we aren't. We are unsecured creditors of Manchester United When we went into administration all football debts had to be settled.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
That doesn't make us secured creditors though
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That doesn't make us secured creditors though Ah but under football rules football debts have to be paid.
COYP |
|
|
I'd rather follow the example of the premier league than that pr*ck in Number 10.
|
|
|
Originally posted by rollercoaster
Well there certainly wont be games behind closed doors. The football has only been suspended (against government advice) to protect the players and staff. The decision about how to move forward will be based on the ulterior motives to the clubs. I suspect those in risk or relegation will join forces with the top 5 to declare that positions stay or such like. The teams in the middle of the table will not really care. It is only Bournemouth and Villa that would feel hard done by so would be out-voted. Completely unfair but how it might go. Also to free up the emergency services that have to be around all major sporting events. Supposedly the banning of large scale events doesn't have a great effect on the virus, it's the strain on the services.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
|
Originally posted by rollercoaster
Playing behind closed doors is a greater danger to the public because it is much easier to catch the virus in a confined space like a pub than it is in an open space like a stadium. But how long are pubs going to remain open> Other European countries are cutting down on any outside socializing right now
|
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
I’m not so sure. I think they will find some way to promote/relegate La Liga already considering developing a formula, for example. Surely this has precedent - there must have been one season where it either finished prematurely or one that had a pause and restarted? y=mx+c where m= league position, x = number of points and c = amount of money in the bank. Well done Barcelona and Real Madrid.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
|
Originally posted by Booted Eagle
y=mx+c where m= league position, x = number of points and c = amount of money in the bank. Well done Barcelona and Real Madrid. Or for the PL we could use the BBC Brexit's formula in which case the sum total of points bar Liverpool have more points so the scousers can't win it.
One more point |
|
|
The bar will still be out of Palace Ale.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Vaibow
In all honesty, looking at the league table and the last 5 matches for form guide, there are a few dead certs and a few unlucky clubs. At the bottom, Villa have the worse record - 4 straight losses one could argue the cups were a factor. Norwich losing too many to assume they could turn it around but are only 7 points off safety (goal difference the factor) so to deny them an opportunity would be a tad harsh. Bournemouth, Watford, West Ham all on 27 with goal difference keeping them safe/18th. Brighton look like they are headed lower in the league - they are lucky. At the top, Liverpool odds on to win league, not even a question. Top seven though, 4th to 7th could be anyones, with spurs slipping out, arsenal creeping in. Palace are on form and actually look like the only mid table team to challenge for top 7, being only 4 points away, with 27 points to play for. So it's a tad harsh on the bottom 3 clubs as they will argue they 'could' turn it around, but, their form doesn't really suggest that. So, it literally boils down to, if the league stops now and is void, Palace look to be the unlucky ones - as their form suggests European football is within touching distance, on a shoe string budget and the lucky ones look to be Brighton, who's descent into the bottom three looks halted. European football would do us no favours and I’d take the place money now looking at our run in.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Is it out the relmes the government buys the remainder of the premier league from sky& BT Yes ... taxpayer's money is sorely needed elsewhere. Sky and BT will start charging customers again to watch any televised matches but if they are all played behind closed doors we should ask for 22% of our current season ticket money to be refunded.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
|
Originally posted by Henry of Peckham
Yes ... taxpayer's money is sorely needed elsewhere. Sky and BT will start charging customers again to watch any televised matches but if they are all played behind closed doors we should ask for 22% of our current season ticket money to be refunded. Keeping people in watching footy will saves lives and money in the NHS, if we are spending hundreds on millions on foreign aid then the tax payer should be looked after. It's a win win for everyone. I'll forgo my season ticket in these special times if I get all the game's on TV.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.