This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
If you look at AWB first games for Palace I think he was very much thrown in at the deep end, unless defenders can’t be, which your post seems to suggest.
Villa should've been relegated with that unseen goal and Villa went into that match without any real hope of winning it didn't they, throwing players into that sort of game didn't show anything, they had three deflected goals that their keeper had no chance to stop and their keeper created an absolute mess for Villa's first, it just encouraged Liverpool to chase and chase and Villa to shoot and shoot with mistake over mistake, quite funny really couldn't happen to a better team lol.
|
|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
Nope dont agree. If Roy does this with Eze, he'll ruin him. Why did he agree to signing him if he doesnt want him to flourish and express himself. Eze can offer so much more then he will be allowed to do. Its Roys job to set the team up around players like Eze. Not stifle his talent and shoe horn him into an unnatural position. I can see how this is going with Eze. Eze will end up on the bench and Roy can turn round and say he tried with him but he has so much to learn(he may) and he'll take time. Its just an excuse with Roy. Look at the players he ostracised - Meyer, camarasa players who could have added something creative centrally but lack the defensive qualities. Roy does not believe in these types of players full stop. All Qpr fans said he is not a wide midfielder.. we all knew thats where Roy would play him. To be honest the signing of Eze did not make sense to me to begin with.. he is NOT a Roy type signing. I think he went with it to appease Parish and Dougie.. and when hes inevitably on the bench he can say I tried with him. We will not see a change in this philosophy until he has gone. Edited by MonsterMunch (05 Oct 2020 9.44am) Zaha is our only stand out top player. The rest are mid to lower table. The team can only punch at their current weight if it operates as a cohesive hard working unit where every player plays with full on energy and with solid defensive qualities. If you played with the free flowing attractive football everyone craves, we would go the way of Norwich. Loads of fans; and back down. Fortunately, our management know this and understand that Roy is who we need right now. Also, complaining about this weekend's result is unfair. There was a vast inequality of arms. Imagine where our club would be had we just spent £220M on players alone? We may have earned results against Chelsea in the past, but you have to put those down as anomalies. Had we been stuffed by Fulham, then let the blood-letting begin.
|
|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
Nope dont agree. If Roy does this with Eze, he'll ruin him. Why did he agree to signing him if he doesnt want him to flourish and express himself. Eze can offer so much more then he will be allowed to do. Its Roys job to set the team up around players like Eze. Not stifle his talent and shoe horn him into an unnatural position. I can see how this is going with Eze. Eze will end up on the bench and Roy can turn round and say he tried with him but he has so much to learn(he may) and he'll take time. Its just an excuse with Roy. Look at the players he ostracised - Meyer, camarasa players who could have added something creative centrally but lack the defensive qualities. Roy does not believe in these types of players full stop. All Qpr fans said he is not a wide midfielder.. we all knew thats where Roy would play him. To be honest the signing of Eze did not make sense to me to begin with.. he is NOT a Roy type signing. I think he went with it to appease Parish and Dougie.. and when hes inevitably on the bench he can say I tried with him. We will not see a change in this philosophy until he has gone. Edited by MonsterMunch (05 Oct 2020 9.44am) Understanding how to defend doesn't result in being unable to flourish and express oneself, I think Townsend so far this season looks quite brilliant and Roy had has hands all over him hasn't he. Meyer and the rest you mention are very obviously not quite up to it and it's very evident when they are playing against organised teams like Chelsea. Eze against Chelsea looked very calm and tricky, hence the eight fouls against him when moving forwards, teams aren't daft in this league and Chelsea soon realised that Eze had a lot of talent with making space for himself and beating players with ease like Zaha and quite often Ayew, Ayew has actually been fouled as many times as Zaha in the past for this very reason, teams know how to stop us and it's up to the officials to prevent this, Chelsea only received two yellow cards for their persistent niggling fouls and they were dished out way way too late to help us and stop Chelsea from basically cheating.
|
|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
Zaha is our only stand out top player. The rest are mid to lower table. The team can only punch at their current weight if it operates as a cohesive hard working unit where every player plays with full on energy and with solid defensive qualities. If you played with the free flowing attractive football everyone craves, we would go the way of Norwich. Loads of fans; and back down. Fortunately, our management know this and understand that Roy is who we need right now. Also, complaining about this weekend's result is unfair. There was a vast inequality of arms. Imagine where our club would be had we just spent £220M on players alone? We may have earned results against Chelsea in the past, but you have to put those down as anomalies. Had we been stuffed by Fulham, then let the blood-letting begin. So correct it's silly.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
So correct it's silly. Have a re-read. Why buy a player of obvious attacking talent and try to dilute him into something he is not. No one is saying we should go hung ho, nobody is saying we should be going toe to toe with teams of obvious superior quality. But if you are trying to tell me we couldnt have got something out the game with more attacking tactics I cant help you. I was talking about Eze in particular.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
We lose Roy now at this stage and we will be a relegation team like no other relegation team has been seen, Roy is keeping us up you twits, we are in big big transition time. Nah.. we are not. When are never not in transition at this club. Roy could be doing more with what he has. He'll get us over the line im not saying he wont, He likely will. Doesnt mean I have to like Roy ball or have higher expectations. I seem to remember Steve P saying something similar once
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
We lose Roy now at this stage and we will be a relegation team like no other relegation team has been seen, Roy is keeping us up you twits, we are in big big transition time. We're always in transition. How many years have we been in the Premier league?
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
We lose Roy now at this stage and we will be a relegation team like no other relegation team has been seen, Roy is keeping us up you twits, we are in big big transition time. Transition must mean change yes? But nothing ever changes! We're treading water until the inevitable happens and we go down. It doesn't have to be like this. Roy is complicit in the club's strategy of just making do.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
Villa should've been relegated with that unseen goal and Villa went into that match without any real hope of winning it didn't they, throwing players into that sort of game didn't show anything, they had three deflected goals that their keeper had no chance to stop and their keeper created an absolute mess for Villa's first, it just encouraged Liverpool to chase and chase and Villa to shoot and shoot with mistake over mistake, quite funny really couldn't happen to a better team lol. Indeed hilarious especially Henderson’s face. However to get deflected goals you do have to shoot, which is something we seem reluctant to do. Villa May have had nothing to lose but you could say the same about us in these games, but we always take the ultra cautious approach, would Roy have started Watkins? I am not sure
|
|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
Nah.. we are not. When are never not in transition at this club. Roy could be doing more with what he has. He'll get us over the line im not saying he wont, He likely will. Doesnt mean I have to like Roy ball or have higher expectations. I seem to remember Steve P saying something similar once This
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
We lose Roy now at this stage and we will be a relegation team like no other relegation team has been seen, Roy is keeping us up you twits, we are in big big transition time. As a matter of interest why are those who have a different view to you, twits?
|
|
|
Originally posted by gambler
Transition must mean change yes? But nothing ever changes! We're treading water until the inevitable happens and we go down. It doesn't have to be like this. Roy is complicit in the club's strategy of just making do. I agree but TBF to Roy, he is probably following instructions. Not saying I like the approach or agree with it though
|
|
|
[quote=Tim Gypsy Hill '64;3563034] Very droll You started it
|
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
What is being missed by the Roy supporters on here is that the game has moved on. Fast passing through midfield, overlapping defenders, high pressing, cynical fouls to stop the opposition. It is the way Liverpool and Man City have played for the last 4 or 5 seasons. Even Jose has realised that his ultra defensive style was out-moded but he has adapted and you can see that in some recent Spurs matches. Bielsa, Potter, Santo, Lampard, Arteta are all working on the same principles. The modern way is so different to how we play and not every team is built on the multi squillions that some think is the only way you can play a different brand of football. Get with the new way of playing or stagnate until every team in the league overtakes you or works out how to break you down. There are only two teams in the league that play as Palace do and the other is Burnley. Fulham/West Brom try but are not good enough, Southampton look good going forward but can't defend and Sheffield Utd are being found out this year by the look of things. There may be 3 worse teams than us fortunately but that is the only way I can see us staying up playing the football we do. We are a dinosaur in a new wave of football. I know, what is coming, there will be the normal bleats that our players are not good enough to play any different, but I don't buy that. Our players do what they are told and Roy ultimately decides who we buy, who plays and how we play. I don't need to go into the arguments for players being left out or out of position because we know them already and they have been done to death. You know what senior pros think of us when the highest praise you hear on tv is that Palace make it difficult for the opposition, which is short for we play a boring brand of park the bus.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
2 wins in 12. The season is 38 games, you seem to be selective. We have only played 4 this season so far and lost by a dodgy hand ball decision to league leaders and moneybags Chelsea.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
What is being missed by the Roy supporters on here is that the game has moved on. Fast passing through midfield, overlapping defenders, high pressing, cynical fouls to stop the opposition. It is the way Liverpool and Man City have played for the last 4 or 5 seasons. Even Jose has realised that his ultra defensive style was out-moded but he has adapted and you can see that in some recent Spurs matches. Bielsa, Potter, Santo, Lampard, Arteta are all working on the same principles. The modern way is so different to how we play and not every team is built on the multi squillions that some think is the only way you can play a different brand of football. Get with the new way of playing or stagnate until every team in the league overtakes you or works out how to break you down. There are only two teams in the league that play as Palace do and the other is Burnley. Fulham/West Brom try but are not good enough, Southampton look good going forward but can't defend and Sheffield Utd are being found out this year by the look of things. There may be 3 worse teams than us fortunately but that is the only way I can see us staying up playing the football we do. We are a dinosaur in a new wave of football. I know, what is coming, there will be the normal bleats that our players are not good enough to play any different, but I don't buy that. Our players do what they are told and Roy ultimately decides who we buy, who plays and how we play. I don't need to go into the arguments for players being left out or out of position because we know them already and they have been done to death. You know what senior pros think of us when the highest praise you hear on tv is that Palace make it difficult for the opposition, which is short for we play a boring brand of park the bus. I'd agree with all of this. What I would also point out is how important it is to start a game on the front foot, particularly against good teams. If you just sit back on the edge of your penalty box and let them get into their stride, sooner rather than later they will break you down. Against man utd we started on the front foot and look sbat happened. But 9 times out of 10 we start really defensively and were lucky last season to get a run of 1-0 wins and managed to stay up. Cant help thinking how good we could be with a bit more adventurous play.
|
|
|
Originally posted by spartakev2
I'd agree with all of this. What I would also point out is how important it is to start a game on the front foot, particularly against good teams. If you just sit back on the edge of your penalty box and let them get into their stride, sooner rather than later they will break you down. Against man utd we started on the front foot and look sbat happened. But 9 times out of 10 we start really defensively and were lucky last season to get a run of 1-0 wins and managed to stay up. Cant help thinking how good we could be with a bit more adventurous play. With so many players around 30 years old, can we consistently play this high energy pressing game needed to start on the front foot ? I thought this is why we were supposed to be bringing down the average age of the team ? (2 permanent signings later, with one still injured). I suspect Roy is here until he decides to call it day. Then we will be in the frantic mess for a new manager we normally are in.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.