You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
October 30 2026 12.11pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 66 of 1552 < 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 >
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 01 Jun 16 1.17pm

No I don't agree with many of the points made by "JamieMartin".

Regarding free movement of Labour, admittedly Norway signed up for this but it certainly doesn't mean that the UK would do so. It is inconceivable that we would leave the EU yet allow the 'Status Quo' , as this whole issue is central to BREXIT.
We simply cannot compare Norway to the UK.

Regards the 'European Court Of Justice' they can interfere with our ability to deport criminals whose presence in our country is NOT conducive to the good of the public. The ECJ have the ultimate authority over whether we can remove such reprobates.Furthermore the ECJ can use the "Charter of Fundamental Rights' to overturn decisions of our elected politicians on asylum policy

Edited by Willo (01 Jun 2016 1.19pm)

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 01 Jun 16 2.06pm

[Link]

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 01 Jun 16 3.14pm

Heavens above.

As Boris Johnson once said "An inverted pyramid of piffle" !

Article mentioned "Crude generalisations" which was very apt.I have spoken to vast numbers of Brexiteers and they certainly don't fit the profile portrayed in the blog.

Article also mentioned "Crackpot Extra-Right Tory fringe" - Many would say I'm a "Crackpot" and I am most certainly on that "Wing" of the party !!!!


 

Hoof Hearted 01 Jun 16 3.15pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I think this raises an interesting flaw in the idea of 'who's British' that actually no one really has a way of determining who is and who isn't British.

Its curious, maybe, that there isn't a central registry that lists all British nationals against which verification could be conducted.

Which suggest to me, that the idea of British Nationality isn't really that much of an important thing to governments in terms of ascertaining (and probably now an absolute nightmare to implement).

Do those ID cards seem like a good idea now?

They always did jamie!

It's only the likes of Nick Clegg and his Liberal namby pamby class that were against them.

All law abiding citizens have no problem with the need to carry ID to prove who they are.

Would make life that bit more difficult for illegals and terrorist types to continue living here as easily as they do now.

 

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 01 Jun 16 3.28pm

Originally posted by Willo

Heavens above.

As Boris Johnson once said "An inverted pyramid of piffle" !

Article mentioned "Crude generalisations" which was very apt.I have spoken to vast numbers of Brexiteers and they certainly don't fit the profile portrayed in the blog.

Article also mentioned "Crackpot Extra-Right Tory fringe" - Many would say I'm a "Crackpot" and I am most certainly on that "Wing" of the party !!!!


It's not a great article/blog, but I do agree with his basic 'us v them' point. Some of the generalisations made (on both sides of the debate) on here and elsewhere, have been staggeringly stupid.

The final sign off is a fair reflection of the whole campaign though;

"Sadly both camps in the EU debate have realised that playing on people's basic emotions (anger and fear) is a good way to herd them over to their side of the argument, hence the appallingly low general standard of debate about such an important political issue. "

 

DanH Flag SW2 01 Jun 16 4.48pm

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

They always did jamie!

It's only the likes of Nick Clegg and his Liberal namby pamby class that were against them.

All law abiding citizens have no problem with the need to carry ID to prove who they are.

Would make life that bit more difficult for illegals and terrorist types to continue living here as easily as they do now.

To be fair I'm approaching thirty and my youthful looks keep getting me IDed. Not being a driver they would have made my life easier as I'm f*cked if I'm carrying my passport everywhere.

 

Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 01 Jun 16 4.55pm

Originally posted by DanH

To be fair I'm approaching thirty and my youthful looks keep getting me IDed. Not being a driver they would have made my life easier as I'm f*cked if I'm carrying my passport everywhere.

If that's the case, you should be compelled to carry it at all times.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

legaleagle Flag 01 Jun 16 8.12pm

Those with a Commonwealth passport living here can vote...At least EU nationals have a close connection with the EU....but people rarely seem to raise this anomaly allowing Commonwealth nations to vote in all our elections...


Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

Voters in this referendum should be limited to those that can turn up with a valid British passport as well as polling card to prove they are eligible.

 

davenotamonkey Flag 01 Jun 16 8.17pm

Originally posted by Willo

No I don't agree with many of the points made by "JamieMartin".

Regarding free movement of Labour, admittedly Norway signed up for this but it certainly doesn't mean that the UK would do so. It is inconceivable that we would leave the EU yet allow the 'Status Quo' , as this whole issue is central to BREXIT.
We simply cannot compare Norway to the UK.

Regards the 'European Court Of Justice' they can interfere with our ability to deport criminals whose presence in our country is NOT conducive to the good of the public. The ECJ have the ultimate authority over whether we can remove such reprobates.Furthermore the ECJ can use the "Charter of Fundamental Rights' to overturn decisions of our elected politicians on asylum policy

Edited by Willo (01 Jun 2016 1.19pm)

As indeed do I. It was a farce of a reply that even conflated the ECJ with the ECHR - erm.... OK! I'm hungry, so I would rather cook and eat than dismantle the (indeed) "piffle" offered as rebuttal to Willo's comments.

What I will say, however, is that despite your list, Willo, of these elements of the EU-UK relationship, it matters not one iota whether Leave are on the right side of history....

Money and big-business interests talk, and right now, they (JP Morgan, Bank of America, Goldmann Sachs, Morgan Stanley) talk in the form of 5-figure donations to the Remain camp. That's just the quasi-transparent money trail. You bet there's more going on under the table.

 

chris123 Flag hove actually 01 Jun 16 8.37pm

Last week it was 4/1 and 1/7 for exit or stay, now it's 5/2 and 2/7.

 

stateside Flag Norfolk 01 Jun 16 8.56pm

IF they get the stay vote then the EU will do what ever they want,we wont have a chance to change anything ever again, and if we complain we will just be told that it is what we voted for.
WE HAVE JUST THIS ONE CHANCE.

 

big_palace_fan Flag 01 Jun 16 9.01pm

Regardless of your side, you should appreciate the EU as a force for peace.

100 years ago, this coming July 1st, 60,000 British soldiers were marched to their death on the first morning of the Battle of the Somme.

Simply inconceivable now that we could be at war with Germany and the European Union should take a lot of credit for that.

 

becky Flag over the moon 01 Jun 16 10.15pm

Originally posted by big_palace_fan

Regardless of your side, you should appreciate the EU as a force for peace.

100 years ago, this coming July 1st, 60,000 British soldiers were marched to their death on the first morning of the Battle of the Somme.

Simply inconceivable now that we could be controlled by Germany and the European Union should take all of credit for that.

E.F.A.

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

nhp61 Flag Goring-By-Sea born, now in Brackne... 01 Jun 16 11.35pm

Originally posted by big_palace_fan

Regardless of your side, you should appreciate the EU as a force for peace.

100 years ago, this coming July 1st, 60,000 British soldiers were marched to their death on the first morning of the Battle of the Somme.

Simply inconceivable now that we could be at war with Germany and the European Union should take a lot of credit for that.

Saying the EU is a force for peace is absolute bollocks.

After World War 2 the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) was formed, uniting most of the western European countries with the USA and Canada with a militarily common and co-operation plan. That has been what has kept the peace in Europe, not the EU.

In fact, it was the EU's meddling in Ukraine, antagonising the Russians that has caused the bloodshed in Crimea.

 

Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 02 Jun 16 1.14am

Originally posted by nhp61

Saying the EU is a force for peace is absolute bollocks.

After World War 2 the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) was formed, uniting most of the western European countries with the USA and Canada with a militarily common and co-operation plan. That has been what has kept the peace in Europe, not the EU.

In fact, it was the EU's meddling in Ukraine, antagonising the Russians that has caused the bloodshed in Crimea.

Yet more sh*te he's come out with.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 02 Jun 16 8.37am

Originally posted by nhp61

Saying the EU is a force for peace is absolute bollocks.

After World War 2 the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) was formed, uniting most of the western European countries with the USA and Canada with a militarily common and co-operation plan. That has been what has kept the peace in Europe, not the EU.

In fact, it was the EU's meddling in Ukraine, antagonising the Russians that has caused the bloodshed in Crimea.

Boris disagrees with you:

""It was his [Churchill] idea to bring these countries together. To bind them so indissolubly that they could never go to war again. And who can deny today that this idea has been a spectacular success? Together with NATO (another institution for which he can claim joint credit) the European Community, now Union, has delivered a period of peace and prosperity for its people as long as any since the days of the Antonine emperors”.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


DivingIsNotGood Flag se25 02 Jun 16 9.37am

Originally posted by Kermit8

Boris disagrees with you:

""It was his [Churchill] idea to bring these countries together. To bind them so indissolubly that they could never go to war again. And who can deny today that this idea has been a spectacular success? Together with NATO (another institution for which he can claim joint credit) the European Community, now Union, has delivered a period of peace and prosperity for its people as long as any since the days of the Antonine emperors”.

Churchill days how many foreign-born nationals lived in European countries? How many immigrants were in Britain?
Labour candidate Benjamin Whittingham tweeted that Churchill was "a racist and white supremacist". [Link]

 


VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 02 Jun 16 10.07am

Originally posted by DivingIsNotGood

Churchill days how many foreign-born nationals lived in European countries? How many immigrants were in Britain?
Labour candidate Benjamin Whittingham tweeted that Churchill was "a racist and white supremacist". [Link]

How many foreign born nationals ruled their own country in the Days of Churchill. Its a bit rich to use Churchill and that era of British History as an argument on migration and foreign influence, given the then existence of the British Empire.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 02 Jun 16 10.11am

Originally posted by DivingIsNotGood

Churchill days how many foreign-born nationals lived in European countries? How many immigrants were in Britain?
Labour candidate Benjamin Whittingham tweeted that Churchill was "a racist and white supremacist". [Link]

I think, in our time, he would be considered a racist and a bit of a supremacist, but certainly not for his own era. By our Modern standards, the likes of Pitt would be probably considered racist, and he abolished the UK Slave trade.

Its brutally unfair to compare people in other eras to our own sensibilities.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 02 Jun 16 10.19am

Originally posted by big_palace_fan

Regardless of your side, you should appreciate the EU as a force for peace.

100 years ago, this coming July 1st, 60,000 British soldiers were marched to their death on the first morning of the Battle of the Somme.

Simply inconceivable now that we could be at war with Germany and the European Union should take a lot of credit for that.

Not really, true. The driving force behind the first world war was Imperialism and colonialism. Effectively as the European powers and world changed, the economic and power interests of these waning powers, shifted dramatically with the rise of national liberation movements in the colonies and the desire for self rule.

This creates a Europe in which the need to compete for resources generated a mutual shared interest among the major European power basis, along with the threat of communism and fascism, to bring them closer together (both effectively being anti-capitalist movements - that threatened the status quo of the 'ruling elite'.

It would be churlish to imagine that the EU somehow kept the peace. What kept the peace was a shift in global power (to the US), the collapse of imperialism to US capitalism and the threat of the soviet and sino-communists, to that new capital imperialism.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Page 66 of 1552 < 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic