This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Those with a Commonwealth passport living here can vote...At least EU nationals have a close connection with the EU....but people rarely seem to raise this anomaly allowing Commonwealth nations to vote in all our elections... Makes sense to me, we can't just be part of the commonwealth when it suits us, and the UK being or not being part of the EU, has an effect on those commonwealth nationals living here.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Hoof Hearted 02 Jun 16 10.28am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Boris disagrees with you: ""It was his [Churchill] idea to bring these countries together. To bind them so indissolubly that they could never go to war again. And who can deny today that this idea has been a spectacular success? Together with NATO (another institution for which he can claim joint credit) the European Community, now Union, has delivered a period of peace and prosperity for its people as long as any since the days of the Antonine emperors”. This is what Churchill (who did not support Britain's membership of the emerging European Community at the time or any other) said on the subject in 1953 (quote taken from Hansard online - so easily verified BTW) “Where do we stand? We are not members of the European Defence Community, nor do we intend to be merged in a Federal European system. We feel we have a special relation to both. This can be expressed by prepositions, by the preposition ‘with’ but not ‘of’ – we are with them, but not of them. We have our own Commonwealth and Empire.”
|
|
| Hoof Hearted 02 Jun 16 10.37am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nhp61
Saying the EU is a force for peace is absolute bollocks. After World War 2 the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) was formed, uniting most of the western European countries with the USA and Canada with a militarily common and co-operation plan. That has been what has kept the peace in Europe, not the EU. In fact, it was the EU's meddling in Ukraine, antagonising the Russians that has caused the bloodshed in Crimea.
Quite right my friend, but 'big_palace_fan' has been told that the EU was a force for peace by the Bremainers and can't be bothered to do the leg work to check out the truth. Us older wiser campaigners that have lived through this evolution of Europe and know the truth and the history are "old duffers and little englanders - whose vote doesn't count" according to the likes of him!
|
|
| Hoof Hearted 02 Jun 16 11.27am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Yes indeed. It's all good news, Hoof. City traders are planning for sterling to drop 20% on Brexit and the dollar to go up 20%. It's going to be great. City Traders are more interested about the possibility of The Fed raising interest rates and the effect of that before any other minor concerns. And yes it is going to be great... like removing the shackles and seeing a bright new dawn.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nhp61
Saying the EU is a force for peace is absolute bollocks. After World War 2 the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) was formed, uniting most of the western European countries with the USA and Canada with a militarily common and co-operation plan. That has been what has kept the peace in Europe, not the EU.
I'd like to add a peace-desiring Germany to this list. They started both the world wars. After having their country completely destroyed, 7 million Germans killed and the country occupied and split up, they 'decided' to give peace a chance. I think this was a much, much bigger factor than setting up the institutions of Brussels.
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If the country stays in I'm going to take it pretty badly. We are the most skeptic country in the EU so if we don't leave the pro-EU lot will paint this country in their image......I don't think I could stand it. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Jun 2016 11.47am)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Unlikely.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Johnny Eagles
I'd like to add a peace-desiring Germany to this list. They started both the world wars. After having their country completely destroyed, 7 million Germans killed and the country occupied and split up, they 'decided' to give peace a chance. I think this was a much, much bigger factor than setting up the institutions of Brussels. Banning them from having a proper army also helped like they did to the Japs. Oh, and making them wealthy. That helped too. They just can't can't be arsed with genocide, rape and invasion. Too busy with the filthy lucre. No fun anymore those two.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If the country stays in I'm going to take it pretty badly. We are the most skeptic country in the EU so if we don't leave the pro-EU lot will paint this country in their image......I don't think I could stand it. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Jun 2016 11.47am) Arguably, if the vote was to remain, then I think that maybe there is a 'distance' between how the media and press regarded the EU and Euro Scepticism, and what the people themselves generally think of the EU. Sometimes what politicians say and the media argues about doesn't necessarily reflect the 'common man'. The UK might only appear to be more split over Europe on the basis of the issues in the Conservative party division over the EU. The knock on of which has been to create news and UKIP etc. There very well could be a very large part of the population, even among the conservative voters, who simply don't share that scepticism. Although I generally think if you want a cynical or sceptical view of anything, you'd ask a British person about it. We're a cynical lot. I think the vote will favour remain. Because in the end, those who aren't fully decided, will go with the 'safe option' which is always the 'status quo' carry on as usual. They usually do. But I'll be voting out.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Banning them from having a proper army also helped like they did to the Japs. Oh, and making them wealthy. That helped too. They just can't can't be arsed with genocide, rape and invasion. Too busy with the filthy lucre. No fun anymore those two.
EU countries should pay for their own defence.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Banning them from having a proper army also helped like they did to the Japs. Oh, and making them wealthy. That helped too. They just can't can't be arsed with genocide, rape and invasion. Too busy with the filthy lucre. No fun anymore those two. I don't think that's the case. The need to compete for territory, as a means of status and economic power, was gone, with the demise of the British and French Empires, the world changed dramatically. Before WWII the influence of the US, on the economy and global stage, was f**ked from 1929 onwards. Post WWII empires and territory was no longer relevant. The US and wealth production was the new source of political capital, economy etc and the competition was the Soviet and Sino-Communists. As such the future of European nations, really was re-defined by the need for mutual co-operation, rather than competition. For those across Europe, as the national liberation movements flared, was really about which 'way' they would go, Capitalism or Socialism. Empire was a dead beast, it could not compete post war with the socialism and the power of US capitalism. You could even see this in the divisions within the UK, with the rise of Labour and Trade Unionism. WWIII was fought through proxies, and called the Cold War. We didn't call it WWIII because it was 'different', the wars were fought around the world, by the super powers. Not so much for territory per se, but for access to resources and markets.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
All Politicians should wear this!!
|
|
| DivingIsNotGood |
|
|---|---|
|
See our news channels have conveniently forgotten to report this [Link] The whole vote is a massive scam rig, the in will win even when 99.9% vote out.
VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again |
|
|
Originally posted by DivingIsNotGood
See our news channels have conveniently forgotten to report this [Link] The whole vote is a massive scam rig, the in will win even when 99.9% vote out. Doesn't matter who wins, or by how much, the other side will bleat about 'biased liberal/right wing media', rigged votes etc etc. I suspect when it comes down to it, the In camp will win- people will vote cautiously, for the status quo, especially if they're not sure. Will be close whatever- probably no more than 55-45 whichever way. Batten down the hatches for the last hysterical shrieking from both sides- latest is that staying in the EU will (somehow) push up housing market- presumably to try and appeal to younger voters. Madness and complete BS arguments and 'facts' from both sides, increasingly nonsensical and crazed!
|
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Chunkymark
|
|
| DivingIsNotGood |
|
|---|---|
|
VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.