This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Maybe it is because the Tory working class media machine and the Sun's successful influence at all elections doesn't get a look in on Merseyside. Some people think about politics for 4 minutes a week and never watch or listen to any politicians talk on TV. They cannot be influenced by the Sun front page then. What contempt this shows for ordinary men and women who apparently are incapable of making up their own minds as to who they want to represent them in Parliament.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
What contempt this shows for ordinary men and women who apparently are incapable of making up their own minds as to who they want to represent them in Parliament. No. People are being made to work longer and harder; throw in stressed-out kids to deal with once back indoors as well and you have a whole audience of knackered brains who are just too worn out to do any critical thinking. Do you still work Hedgehog? Travel up to town every day? If you did, you'd see thousands of those shattered faces all around you day in, day out, staring at their devices / reading the Metro / being advertised at by unavoidable video billboards..... If it didn't actually work, why would people spend so much time, effort and money on promoting their agenda through the media? Just a thought.
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
|
Originally posted by Mr_Gristle
No. People are being made to work longer and harder; throw in stressed-out kids to deal with once back indoors as well and you have a whole audience of knackered brains who are just too worn out to do any critical thinking. Do you still work Hedgehog? Travel up to town every day? If you did, you'd see thousands of those shattered faces all around you day in, day out, staring at their devices / reading the Metro / being advertised at by unavoidable video billboards..... If it didn't actually work, why would people spend so much time, effort and money on promoting their agenda through the media? Just a thought. Absolutely spot on. In a democracy, the role of the media is supposed to be holding politicians to account. If you believe this is true how can you possibly deny that the media influences public opinion? Saying that, the majority of the media in this country wants people to view politics as the X factor, like some detached circus where we ape and ogle at recognisable faces, boo and jeer at others, with little or no interest in actually critical, brave debate.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
So what is Labour's purpose and future then? Like the Liberal Party after World War I? A few MPs pandering to minority extremist views? A perpetual protest group using extra-parliamentary means? Our politicians are accountable to Parliament and ultimately, the electorate. I agree that this accountability has been diluted by the existence of regional 'parliaments' and the non-democratic EU - but at least we are freeing ourselves from the latter. Edited by hedgehog50 (06 May 2017 9.18am) Accountability has nothing to do with regional parliaments. Accountability is about individuals critically regarding their public servants: reading what they promise to do, and holding their feet to the fire if they don't do it. I know I'm biased here but we can see this isnt happening with the current government. They made manifesto proposals to end the deficit by 2015, and its barely moved. They said theyd fund the NHS with money saved from brussels, which is a lie. Both her and Cameron promised to be compassionate conservatives, yet wage decline in this country is in its worst decade since the 1780s, and theyve cut disability benefits and funding to homeless and local community groups, something they never said theyd do. People are so disengaged from this level of accountability that the Tories are going in to an election with pretty much no policy basis, and yet they know they can win comfortably. I think this is pretty much unprecedented in my lifetime, that a party has so heavily relied on a series of repetitive meaningless slogans to win a democratic election. It's post modern politics, and depressingly its working.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
What contempt this shows for ordinary men and women who apparently are incapable of making up their own minds as to who they want to represent them in Parliament. It is common knowledge the sun influences a large proportion of voters. It's bought by 4 million and read by 10 million. Big damaging headlines on the front and a pathetic amount of current affairs in column inches on page 2, which is ignored as its opposite bikini girl on page 3. I never said all people, all working class, or all scousers. It just needs enough to swing the result, and it can.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
What contempt this shows for ordinary men and women who apparently are incapable of making up their own minds as to who they want to represent them in Parliament. Why do you think May and Trump go for short, repetitive slogans then? It works, that's why. And it's not just as simple as being interested in making up their own minds. Some are just not that interested in politics so are influenced by short doses of political communication.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Accountability has nothing to do with regional parliaments. Accountability is about individuals critically regarding their public servants: reading what they promise to do, and holding their feet to the fire if they don't do it. I know I'm biased here but we can see this isnt happening with the current government. They made manifesto proposals to end the deficit by 2015, and its barely moved. They said theyd fund the NHS with money saved from brussels, which is a lie. Both her and Cameron promised to be compassionate conservatives, yet wage decline in this country is in its worst decade since the 1780s, and theyve cut disability benefits and funding to homeless and local community groups, something they never said theyd do. People are so disengaged from this level of accountability that the Tories are going in to an election with pretty much no policy basis, and yet they know they can win comfortably. I think this is pretty much unprecedented in my lifetime, that a party has so heavily relied on a series of repetitive meaningless slogans to win a democratic election. It's post modern politics, and depressingly its working. The £350 million per week saved after Brexit to go to the NHS was what COULD BE DONE, by someone who is a foreign minister, not PM or health secretary. Even Farage said it was bollox. It's also, as we all know, not £350 mil if you take into the account the rebate of nearly half that they tell you where to spend it. I agree with a lot of what you've said though. I voted Lib dem in 2010 for diluted conservatism, Tory in 2015, I now probably HAVE TO vote Tory now, which is how I'm sure many feel. I have and would vote Labour, not that it makes much difference if in a safe blue seat, but in the last 7 years? The unions blew it getting Ed Moribund in. Should've been David. He was their only hope. Now it's even worse. Without the apocalypse there will never be a socialist government. The thing is, many lefties wanted an election to decide Brexit/referendum 2. Now there is one Labour are shy in Brexit whilst the Tories are scooping it all up. Labour need to embrace Brexit and take some ownership of it and what they can offer. Without that they're toast. Some of us want to hear about policy but the numbers aren't going to swing it. Brexit will, but too many labour MPs won't drop their remain ideology. Better look for alternative employment for when the parachute money runs out then.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
The £350 million per week saved after Brexit to go to the NHS was what COULD BE DONE, by someone who is a foreign minister, not PM or health secretary. Even Farage said it was bollox. It's also, as we all know, not £350 mil if you take into the account the rebate of nearly half that they tell you where to spend it. I agree with a lot of what you've said though. I voted Lib dem in 2010 for diluted conservatism, Tory in 2015, I now probably HAVE TO vote Tory now, which is how I'm sure many feel. I have and would vote Labour, not that it makes much difference if in a safe blue seat, but in the last 7 years? The unions blew it getting Ed Moribund in. Should've been David. He was their only hope. Now it's even worse. Without the apocalypse there will never be a socialist government. The thing is, many lefties wanted an election to decide Brexit/referendum 2. Now there is one Labour are shy in Brexit whilst the Tories are scooping it all up. Labour need to embrace Brexit and take some ownership of it and what they can offer. Without that they're toast. Some of us want to hear about policy but the numbers aren't going to swing it. Brexit will, but too many labour MPs won't drop their remain ideology. Better look for alternative employment for when the parachute money runs out then.
Compare that to the Lib Dems who want to remain, the Tories, who everyday are further alienating the 27 EU delegates who they need to find agreement with to put Brecit in place. The idea of May convincing them after the past week or so? I mean come on, she's so weak it's embarrassing. But Labour's problem is, that they are the main opposition but have been regularly declared unelectable by the British media. If you have the main opposition constantly degraded as unelectable, and unable to get their message out, you are well on your way to authoritarianism.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Why do you think May and Trump go for short, repetitive slogans then? It works, that's why. And it's not just as simple as being interested in making up their own minds. Some are just not that interested in politics so are influenced by short doses of political communication. So how do you propose to run elections then? No electioning allowed? No statements of policy however, short or long? Banning of newspapers during the campaign? How would you structure it so that the electorate are not duped as you think by the Sun etc.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| legaleagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
So how do you propose to run elections then? No electioning allowed? No statements of policy however, short or long? Banning of newspapers during the campaign? How would you structure it so that the electorate are not duped as you think by the Sun etc. Stronger rules guarding against concentrations of ownership within the media,for a start.
|
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
There is a shocking lack of accountability for the actions of our politicians, left and right. Most people on this thread probably have no idea what burnham has ever done as a politician, but are content to laud him as a good one. Is that first paragraph a comedy post? Good second paragraph but come on....Getting involved in politics without gaining power is little more than talking for the fun of it. I know the 'progressive left' are divorced from reality...and I really don't mind that...but when they take over the main opposition it's a real problem for working class people in the country. The hard left just end up making life worse for the poorest....still they aren't the types to take the responsibility and instead just finger point instead of address the real deficiencies.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Compare that to the Lib Dems who want to remain, the Tories, who everyday are further alienating the 27 EU delegates who they need to find agreement with to put Brecit in place. The idea of May convincing them after the past week or so? I mean come on, she's so weak it's embarrassing. But Labour's problem is, that they are the main opposition but have been regularly declared unelectable by the British media. If you have the main opposition constantly degraded as unelectable, and unable to get their message out, you are well on your way to authoritarianism. What is soft Brexit? What is hard Brexit? Hard Brexit to me would be no deal at all. Anything else by definition is surely "soft"? No party can tell us what their post Brexit deal will look like. It is heavily dependant on the EU too. As for the 27, the current noises coming from Juncker reflect the reasons why I nearly voted leave. He is stirring the pot and ironically, probably strengthening May's position. Norway, Holland and probably a few others will not want us to just walk away. Even France, 10% unemployment! even higher amongst the youth, with a diminishing GDP don't want a bad deal.
|
|
|
Originally posted by leifandersonshair
I'd like to think so... sadly a majority of MP's (on all sides) seem to be brown nosing yes men. If a 'NHS Privatisation Bill' or whatever came up later this year, with a Tory majority of 70 or 80, do you really think 70 or 80 of 400 Tory MP's would defy a 3 line whip? It wouldn't happen That will never happen but I would not be unnerved by Labour and SNP nonsense about power grabs and dictatorships.
|
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Compare that to the Lib Dems who want to remain, the Tories, who everyday are further alienating the 27 EU delegates who they need to find agreement with to put Brecit in place. The idea of May convincing them after the past week or so? I mean come on, she's so weak it's embarrassing. But Labour's problem is, that they are the main opposition but have been regularly declared unelectable by the British media. If you have the main opposition constantly degraded as unelectable, and unable to get their message out, you are well on your way to authoritarianism. The deal with the EU is going to be a political, not a legal, settlement. Hence all of the game should being played by Tusk and Juncker. Asking for ridiculous amounts of money the scale of which is not owed by Britain, trying to interfere with the process of the GE, name calling of Theresa May. This shows us that the EU is rattled. Remember that the EU is one giant horse trade. Always has been. Because it is a union of so many countries and cultures, politics is ingrained in its DNA. Kier Starmer may well have a stella legal mind, he is a very capable and intelligent barrister, by playing the political minerield that is Brussels? I don't think he is capable of doing that because his brain is focused on legalese rather than dirty politics.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Stronger rules guarding against concentrations of ownership within the media,for a start. Could you elaborate? Do you mean restricting the likes of the state funded BBC?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Is that first paragraph a comedy post? Good second paragraph but come on....Getting involved in politics without gaining power is little more than talking for the fun of it. I know the 'progressive left' are divorced from reality...and I really don't mind that...but when they take over the main opposition it's a real problem for working class people in the country. The hard left just end up making life worse for the poorest....still they aren't the types to take the responsibility and instead just finger point instead of address the real deficiencies. You need to think aboutpolitics in a different way mate. Think about local action groups. I help out in one of the many soup kitchens across the country, giving out food to those who often go hungry or eat crap. No elections are needed for this. Politics is not exclusively about power, its about participating, actively looking out for your fellow man, and not just trying to gain superiority over others. Who does more good politically, soup kitchens or blairites? We aren't divorced from reality, we are trying to actively help thepoor while most just read the news and do nothing. Rant over.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
You need to think aboutpolitics in a different way mate. Think about local action groups. I help out in one of the many soup kitchens across the country, giving out food to those who often go hungry or eat crap. No elections are needed for this. Politics is not exclusively about power, its about participating, actively looking out for your fellow man, and not just trying to gain superiority over others. Who does more good politically, soup kitchens or blairites? We aren't divorced from reality, we are trying to actively help thepoor while most just read the news and do nothing. Rant over. You call charity politics? Yeah, your charity is so much more important than 'insert person here' person's charity. Because you think it is. I do most certainly think 'progressives' are divorced from reality. They have done more damage to the poor than anyone by making the main opposition unelectable......They did it when taking over Labour in the seventies and early eighties and they are doing it again. The outcomes for the poor and working classes will be the same regardless. Still, as long as you think you are being 'political'.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You call charity politics? Yeah, your charity is so much more important than 'insert person here' person's charity. Because you think it is. I do most certainly think 'progressives' are divorced from reality. They have done more damage to the poor than anyone by making the main opposition unelectable......They did it when taking over Labour in the seventies and early eighties and they are doing it again. The outcomes for the poor and working classes will be the same regardless. Still, as long as you think you are being 'political'. To my mind politics is mainly about helping and standing up for the most vulnerable. That can be done through voting, but it can also be done on an individual basis and a collective one. Putting all your faith in westminster to look after the poor will lead to inevitable disappointment. Anyway ill focus on the palace now. Eagles!
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
To my mind politics is mainly about helping and standing up for the most vulnerable. That can be done through voting, but it can also be done on an individual basis and a collective one. Putting all your faith in westminster to look after the poor will lead to inevitable disappointment. Anyway ill focus on the palace now. Eagles! I will commend you on your work for your common man.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.