This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Education spending. See graph and note spending under the last Labour government. This government has planned real cuts of 6.5% over the remainder of this decade. DfE spokesman acknowledging the big increases in spending since 1990 but failing to mention that all of that was due to the previous Labour government. This in the midst of a productivity crisis. WTF? This BBC podcast discusses the numbers and also fact checks Boris (who knew, he talks a load of old boll*x)
|
|
|
Well, he's already fatally damaged his own. [Tweet Link]
|
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Boom tish I was thinking more, well its taking him two years to destroy his own!
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Education spending. See graph and note spending under the last Labour government. This government has planned real cuts of 6.5% over the remainder of this decade. DfE spokesman acknowledging the big increases in spending since 1990 but failing to mention that all of that was due to the previous Labour government. This in the midst of a productivity crisis. WTF? This BBC podcast discusses the numbers and also fact checks Boris (who knew, he talks a load of old boll*x) Problem also is, that increasing spending on something life the NHS or Education is actually resolving any of its problems. You can increase spending on a f**ked car, doesn't mean its going to make it work, just because you put fancy tires on the wheels.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
I am already taxed on my health care that comes as part of my salary package. Either McDonnell doesn't realise that people are already taxed or I will have to pay even more, for not using the NHS. This goes back to my point several pages ago. The NHS may well need more money but it needs a complete overhaul, looking at what the NHS should and shouldn't provide, funding, training, and how it can work along with private health care. Unfortunately it appears to be beyond the wit of our politicians and probably the general public too. People shouldn't be taxed for having private health care. Private health care providers should be effectively charged for their use of NHS facilities etc. Its absurd that people can pay for private health care and the NHS doesn't benefit from not providing those people with cover.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
People shouldn't be taxed for having private health care. Private health care providers should be effectively charged for their use of NHS facilities etc. Its absurd that people can pay for private health care and the NHS doesn't benefit from not providing those people with cover. They are, whether it is enough of course is another matter I have no idea what the "going rate" is.
|
|
|
Oh dear.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Indeed. Do you think what she tweeted years ago represents labour views?
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Indeed. Do you think what she tweeted years ago represents labour views? You would need to ask her. I am guessing though that if this had been a member of UKIP or one of the Cunds you would be calling for here head? A fair assessment?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Strong and stable. Yawn. Also she wants to bring back fox hunting. A woman of the people I tell you. Sensible laws for the JAMs.
|
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
From that commie loving source, Forbes. Again, I ask, how can Labour possibly outdo the current lot in terms of mismanaging a country? Where ex serviceman are all over our streets yet where our taxes continue to go in to building bombs for regimes we've never heard of, in countries we never heard of, to kill people we never heard of. Where wages in real terms for average people have fallen more sharply than at any point in over two centuries, yet where, because of income increases for the very richest, we're told the economy is doing well!?!? People in power are absolutely mugging us off. Sorry thats bullsh1t
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Strong and stable. Yawn. Also she wants to bring back fox hunting. A woman of the people I tell you. Sensible laws for the JAMs. I am reminded many years ago when I used to peruse the 'BBS' that Trolley was very much pro-hunting and was a member of a 'Hunt'.He used to get into many a fiesty exchange by those opposed to it and there used to be more eruptions than Vesuvius. I am not or never been a member of any 'Hunt' but I will say the case for repealing the 'Hunting Act' remains very strong. That's all I will say on this matter else this 'Thread' will end up like the 'Fox Hunting' threads on the BBS and the focus will turn to me rather than the subject matter of this thread.So no more to say on this even if those goad me to try and lure me into a response.It WON'T be forthcoming.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I am reminded many years ago when I used to peruse the 'BBS' that Trolley was very much pro-hunting and was a member of a 'Hunt'.He used to get into many a fiesty exchange by those opposed to it and there used to be more eruptions than Vesuvius. I am not or never been a member of any 'Hunt' but I will say the case for repealing the 'Hunting Act' remains very strong. That's all I will say on this matter else this 'Thread' will end up like the 'Fox Hunting' threads on the BBS and the focus will turn to me rather than the subject matter of this thread.So no more to say on this even if those goad me to try and lure me into a response.It WON'T be forthcoming. You really are a screaming attention sseking drama queen.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
You really are a screaming attention sseking drama queen. I can assure you nothing could be further from the truth. The rationale behind my comments were so that I was NOT the focus of attention and I very much hope the Thread is not de-railed to the extent it turns into yet another tedious WILLO thread with me being in the 'Spotlight'. So now let's NOT get into a contretemps about this and concentrate on the 'General Election'. Thanks.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I can assure you nothing could be further from the truth. The rationale behind my comments were so that I was NOT the focus of attention and I very much hope the Thread is not de-railed to the extent it turns into yet another tedious WILLO thread with me being in the 'Spotlight'. So now let's NOT get into a contretemps about this and concentrate on the 'General Election'. Thanks.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
Hogwash, or as I prefer to say, Bollocks Some lovely gentleman (Now deceased) used to say when the "B' word was used "When you grow up you will get a pair" !!!! You have used the word in the "Plural" - be careful it might be very sensitive to those who might only have one !
Edited by Willo (10 May 2017 10.13am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I am reminded many years ago when I used to peruse the 'BBS' that Trolley was very much pro-hunting and was a member of a 'Hunt'.He used to get into many a fiesty exchange by those opposed to it and there used to be more eruptions than Vesuvius. I am not or never been a member of any 'Hunt' but I will say the case for repealing the 'Hunting Act' remains very strong. That's all I will say on this matter else this 'Thread' will end up like the 'Fox Hunting' threads on the BBS and the focus will turn to me rather than the subject matter of this thread.So no more to say on this even if those goad me to try and lure me into a response.It WON'T be forthcoming. Two further responses have come forth so that puts the tin lid on that particular undertaking.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyh
Sorry thats bullsh1t I'll give you my honest opinion. That figure is given by the Resolution Foundation, whose role is to investigate inequality and poverty. I have no real reason to disbelieve what they say... But it does sound pretty speculative given the lack of data from that time. I doubt the 1780s had the same data collection ability as today, other than censors which were incredibly unreliable. However, I don't think that my overall point is moot. Let's take a less questionable claim: the IFS saying the 2010s will be the worst decade for real term pay for average earners in the post war period. Public sector pay in the NHS, police and other essential services has fallen on average by 10%. What this means, is that for most people, the economy isn't working for them. There wages are stagnating, but inflation's going up, as is rent. Yet you have the Tories claiming there is a strong and stable economy. Why? Because the richest 1000 people in this country have increased their wealth by over 40 billion, and this is taken in to account in GDP figures. That's why every time May says this is a strong and stable economy, she is really laughing at us. How can you imagine a state to be run worse than this? Almost every single sector of society is seeing their money drain away to fund the projects of the megarich, all in an attempt to keep these bullsh't GDP figures in tact. Anyone who thinks they can overlook this by just continually questioning the sources, well i'm sorry, but they're all just laughing at you. We are having the money from our pockets robbed, and when a politician comes along promising to rebalance it, we call him the extremist! What a country this place has become...
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Two further responses have come forth so that puts the tin lid on that particular undertaking. I actually intimated that I wouldn't get lured into any goading regards 'Fox Hunting', NOT that I wouldn't respond at all on here. Going back to the 'General Election' my view mirrors that of Dan Hodges who writes in the 'Mail' and is the son of Glenda Jackson.His view is that Corbyn is NOT trying to win the election, all he is doing is trying to firm up his 'Power base' in terms of his Leadership by his narrow left-wing agenda which just appeals to those who voted him as leader.As Dan Hodges has said, yesterday wasn't the launch of Labour's election campaign , it was the launch of Corbyn's leadership campaign.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.