This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
How do you protest then when you want to see change? Seriously? In a democracy? You organise an event, inform the Police of your gathering and then turn up and protest. You don't break into events where you aren't invited and disrupt them.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I love this photo of Jeremy Hunt’s wife.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Invalid user 2019 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Never mind them, with the expressions from those in the audience milkshakes are the least of our problems.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Legally and aggravated trespass isn't legal
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Legally and aggravated trespass isn't legal But this wasn’t aggravated trespass.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by dollardays
Never mind them, with the expressions from those in the audience milkshakes are the least of our problems. Apparently she walked past the back of his chair.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Of course it was. I have already posted the definition of aggravated trespass:- You must be doing two things to commit aggravated trespass: What these idiots were doing fell into both categories and I would like to see them all prosecuted
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Seriously? In a democracy? You organise an event, inform the Police of your gathering and then turn up and protest. You don't break into events where you aren't invited and disrupt them. Democracy is such a pain. I'm right and you lot are too stupid to see that. I can't be bothered convincing you in the normal way like joining or starting a party and campaigning for change. No because I am morally superior to the rest of you lot I will ruin people's day by blockading road, railway stations and airports or spoil their evenings out. I mean what's the alternative that I come up with an imaginative campaign that catches the public eye and pushes my agenda, that sounds like hard work. No I will go with the old tried and trusted methods, anyway their only Tories and they can't touch me because I am entitled to do as I like but will get offended if anyone dares stop me.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Of course it was. I have already posted the definition of aggravated trespass:- You must be doing two things to commit aggravated trespass: What these idiots were doing fell into both categories and I would like to see them all prosecuted Not so. They were not found guilty of anything. No Magistrate ever would have done so. You are confusing British precedential law with Napoleonic law.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Not so. They were not found guilty of anything. No Magistrate ever would have done so. You are confusing British precedential law with Napoleonic law. The levels to which you will stoop to justify the unjustifiable. Do you ever wonder if you might just be bonkers?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The levels to which you will stoop to justify the unjustifiable. Do you ever wonder if you might just be bonkers? Sigh Anyone that doesn't agree with you automatically is bonkers, you have always made that clear. And as someone that believes in cerebral hygiene there is zero chance anyone can convince you to agree with them. As a Judge I would have thought you of all people can see that the protest was not viewed as illegal and therefore presumably the threshold for being aggravated trespass had not been crossed. There is plenty of precedent on this issue, both in UK law and also from the UCHR.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Park Road ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Not so. They were not found guilty of anything. No Magistrate ever would have done so. You are confusing British precedential law with Napoleonic law. In the states, if you trespass on someones property aggravated or not... you can be shot...no magistrates involved
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.