If we could get Pochettino (we couldn't) on low wages, why not?

I think the owners should always look for opportunities to improve us. Although the role of a manager is obviously different to that of a player.

By the same token, if the choice of a replacement isn't obviously better, it's best to stick with what we have. At this moment in time, that's where I see us.

My feeling is that Covid will increasingly reward entertaining teams and punish dull ones (in terms of TV money). (My view is full crowds won't be at games for years).

So my view is managers whose teams play good, attacking football will command premiums.

If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.

Agree completely. He is a major asset as is Ray Lewington. That will probably become even more apparent when they both leave/retire. Replacing them will be no easy matter.

Really.

There must be someone out there who can get much better out of the attacking options we have !!

I would be interested to hear a pre-match team talk by Roy. Does he actually stand there and say "sit back,stay behind the ball, keep it tight and only ever attack on the break"?

The other possibility is that the players themselves are not good enough to play positively and creatively, and have no confidence in taking the initiative. I don't entirely go along with such a hypothesis, but we all know our ability to pass accurately and maintain possession ain't great.

Good luck to sky promoting the pay per view game v Fulham after that pile of sh1te.