That view might have some validity if those were the only options available, although how the Daily Mail equates to the Socialist Worker is a mystery - whatever the right wing equivalent is I don't know - but there are any number of middle of the road opinions around for balance. If challenging your own preconceptions is too unsettling then of course the BBC is always there.

Or the weather.
Or VAR.
Or CPFC's results.
Or the American election.

The Mail and the Socialist Worker are equally biased in favour of the political outlook they promulgate. There are others who take also sides but not to quite the same level, and then there is indeed the BBC who doesn’t. Except in the minds of those who do.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

So what's the problem with getting a view from both ends of the spectrum as well as that from the centre?

Only that the viewpoint of both is so distorted that nothing can be seen clearly so reading them is wasting time and effort when better sources are available.

I only ever look in such places if I want to understand how the extremes are approaching something and what to expect from them. Never to actually gain a true understanding.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I’m not comparing them; I’m stating that both the left (Guardian), the right (GB News) and the centre (BBC), reported these events involving the Refugees Welcome gatherings. My disagreement with you was over your view that nobody agrees with illegal immigration; the protests show that you are incorrect.

hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.