You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > roy out
October 25 2026 11.33pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

roy out


Page 83 of 231 < 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 >
jeeagles Flag 10 Jan 21 2.15pm

Originally posted by gaz1959

Agree with all the above but surely with the squad we have we can play more than defend at all costs and hope for something on the brake, also for what ever reason roy doesn't like giving youngsters a go.

What people supporting Roy fail to grasp is that no one is asking for fast flowing football. All we are asking is a manager who is willing to take just a tiny bit of risk and set the team up in a way that may cause the opposition a few problems and give their defence something to think about.

Under Roy, we just pass sideways and backwards without any shots on target. We can no longer keep a clean sheet, there doesn't seem to be any fight in the players and when we go 1 nil down its all over.

We were basically Sheffield United with better players. Results didn't look bad on paper (Until Chelsea, Liverpool, Villa), but the performances are a disgrace.

 

Painter Flag Croydon 10 Jan 21 2.23pm

Originally posted by Plaistow Eagle

Yes I agree that Roy has kept us away from the perennial relegation battle.

But our squad is so now/should be doing so much better than that - can't you see that..??

Roy's tactics are just stifling what is the most talented squad since we have been back in the Prem.

Standing still simply ain't good enough - on that IMO we are going backwards and we shouldn't be not with the resources at Roy's disposal.

It's quite clear we ain't going to progress further under Roy - he's time is done.

Thanks for all you've done Roy but now is the time to move on..!!

COYP

It maybe the best squad we have ever had, but there are a few problems with that. Every other team has improved their squad as well, ours is also one of the oldest, which shows when younger teams press us.
Roy is doing what Roy does, get enough points for us to remain in the Premier. The squad needs freshening up everybody can see that, but it cant be done overnight.
Its pretty obvious Roy will retire in the summer and a new man will come in new with some new players. No doubt within a month there will be a thread with their name and out beside it.
Expectations are always higher than the reality, over a season we end up where we should be in terms of ability.

 

NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 10 Jan 21 2.41pm

Originally posted by jeeagles

What people supporting Roy fail to grasp is that no one is asking for fast flowing football. All we are asking is a manager who is willing to take just a tiny bit of risk and set the team up in a way that may cause the opposition a few problems and give their defence something to think about.

Under Roy, we just pass sideways and backwards without any shots on target. We can no longer keep a clean sheet, there doesn't seem to be any fight in the players and when we go 1 nil down its all over.

We were basically Sheffield United with better players. Results didn't look bad on paper (Until Chelsea, Liverpool, Villa), but the performances are a disgrace.

I would counter that by saying that what the anti Roy faction fail to grasp is that his tactics and methods are tried and trusted. And that is why he continues to use them.

Put yourself in his shoes. You are given the overriding objective of keeping the club in the Premier League. The way you manage has achieved this successfully for the last 3 years. It shows every sign of it being successful again. ( a quick look at the table shows we are level on points with Wolves - who play attractive football and have also spent a fortune, and just 1 point behind Arsenal and Leeds ). Would you be open to change ?

I don't think any of my fellow Pro Roy supporters would claim that the football has been exciting or attractive. Just effective.

 


Old, Ungifted and White

YoDougie Flag London 10 Jan 21 3.29pm

Originally posted by Willo

His task is to ensure that we stay in the PL, not to build for the future and he trusts his more experienced players to meet this objective.

If this is true, then in my opinion what a waste of time for the last 3 and a half years. How can a club have no plans to move forward and build for the future in such a long period of time?

In terms of the club having no money too, I agree we aren't at the level to splash like the top clubs, or even like Wolves or Leeds have, but we arent so poor that all we can afford is £10mill net spend over the last few years (according to someone else who said that). Prize money each year, ad revenue means we can afford more. We just don't get told what's happening behind the scenes either. So nobody knows why we are sitting and just waiting for time to pass.

 

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 10 Jan 21 3.45pm

It looks like someone at the Mirror has been reading the Hodgson out thread on here.

[Link]

 

jeeagles Flag 10 Jan 21 3.49pm

Originally posted by NEILLO

I would counter that by saying that what the anti Roy faction fail to grasp is that his tactics and methods are tried and trusted. And that is why he continues to use them.

Put yourself in his shoes. You are given the overriding objective of keeping the club in the Premier League. The way you manage has achieved this successfully for the last 3 years. It shows every sign of it being successful again. ( a quick look at the table shows we are level on points with Wolves - who play attractive football and have also spent a fortune, and just 1 point behind Arsenal and Leeds ). Would you be open to change ?

I don't think any of my fellow Pro Roy supporters would claim that the football has been exciting or attractive. Just effective.

Like someone said a while back. Roy could take a 20th place team and take them to 15th, or a 10th place team and take them to 15th... but only for a couple of seasons.

Eventually the players get fatigued of Roy's methods the club he's in charge of run out of steam, that's happened already. I don't think its a disrespectful observation of Roy, most managers only last a couple of years before things need to be freshened up.

We have Roy's best ever squad. His words. We should be looking at a bit more than just getting by, otherwise we will stagnate, and stagnation is death at this level. Very few managers each generation can manage to keep things progressing for longer.

We picked up 35 points in 2020 and we are declining.

 

doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 10 Jan 21 4.21pm

Originally posted by YoDougie

If this is true, then in my opinion what a waste of time for the last 3 and a half years. How can a club have no plans to move forward and build for the future in such a long period of time?

In terms of the club having no money too, I agree we aren't at the level to splash like the top clubs, or even like Wolves or Leeds have, but we arent so poor that all we can afford is £10mill net spend over the last few years (according to someone else who said that). Prize money each year, ad revenue means we can afford more. We just don't get told what's happening behind the scenes either. So nobody knows why we are sitting and just waiting for time to pass.


I would suggest that the upgrading of the Academy is evidence of a desire to move forward as are the (albeit frustratingly slow to come to fruition) plans for a rebuild of the Main stand.

With a net spend (apparently) of about £10m over 3 years there's little chance of our being able to strengthen the squad from outside unless the owners are prepared to bankroll some serious spending and I don't see that happening. It is most unlikely to happen whilst Roy is still here because he's shown he can keep the club up with minimal spending (minimal in PL terms). I doubt a new manager will get that much to spend.

It may well be a case of hoping the Academy will produce a few gems before the threat of relegation hits us.

 

NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 10 Jan 21 4.44pm

Originally posted by jeeagles

Like someone said a while back. Roy could take a 20th place team and take them to 15th, or a 10th place team and take them to 15th... but only for a couple of seasons.

Eventually the players get fatigued of Roy's methods the club he's in charge of run out of steam, that's happened already. I don't think its a disrespectful observation of Roy, most managers only last a couple of years before things need to be freshened up.

We have Roy's best ever squad. His words. We should be looking at a bit more than just getting by, otherwise we will stagnate, and stagnation is death at this level. Very few managers each generation can manage to keep things progressing for longer.

We picked up 35 points in 2020 and we are declining.

I don't really disagree with your thoughts, but I ask you again, where is the motivation for Roy to change ? Honestly now - what would you do if you were him ?

 


Old, Ungifted and White

NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 10 Jan 21 4.46pm

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

It looks like someone at the Mirror has been reading the Hodgson out thread on here.

[Link]

Agreed - lazy journalism at it's best. At least get the facts right - the Newcastle defeat was at home...and was the defeat to Burnley really '' shocking '' ?? - not to us it wasn't !

 


Old, Ungifted and White

NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 10 Jan 21 4.53pm

Originally posted by YoDougie

If this is true, then in my opinion what a waste of time for the last 3 and a half years. How can a club have no plans to move forward and build for the future in such a long period of time?

In terms of the club having no money too, I agree we aren't at the level to splash like the top clubs, or even like Wolves or Leeds have, but we arent so poor that all we can afford is £10mill net spend over the last few years (according to someone else who said that). Prize money each year, ad revenue means we can afford more. We just don't get told what's happening behind the scenes either. So nobody knows why we are sitting and just waiting for time to pass.

I don't think you can make the statement about the £10m spend and then state that we don't get told what's happening behind the scenes. It's true that we don't but you can't assume that we could have afforded to spend more.

What we do know is the expenditure on the Academy. We also know that our wage bill v. income ratio is unsustainable. We also know that our revenue is hamstrung by the outdated facilities at Selhurst Park.

I think that is a more likely scenario pre the signing of Eze. Parish used to think in terms of spending ' cycles '. If he still does I think we need to hope we are in one now.

 


Old, Ungifted and White

jeeagles Flag 10 Jan 21 5.02pm

Originally posted by NEILLO

I don't really disagree with your thoughts, but I ask you again, where is the motivation for Roy to change ? Honestly now - what would you do if you were him ?

I'd retire. Even Fergie had retried by his age. I'd hope to be retired a long time before that. Maybe go out and pursue other passions, travel the world, spend time with grandkids?

£4.5m a year is a lot of money, but when you are already a multimillionaire surely there's better stuff you can do with your time than go to a freezing cold training ground in Beckenham every day. He can't take it with him and only has one child to give it to. Surely, you get to a point when you don't need the money anymore. Maybe Mrs Roy wants a Sunseaker?

Given he's in the twilight of his career. Why's he satisfied with such a low level of ambition. Friday night may have been his last opportunity to win a major trophy and we didn't even chase the game.

He had one season to prove a point after his England failure. Now, I cant really see what would motivate him. He's done this all before and isn't going to try anything new. He has got a track record of being stubborn though.

What would you do if you were a 73 year old multimillionaire who'd already had a long career?

Edited by jeeagles (10 Jan 2021 5.03pm)

 

EddieMac Flag 10 Jan 21 5.11pm

Originally posted by jeeagles

I'd retire. Even Fergie had retried by his age. I'd hope to be retired a long time before that. Maybe go out and pursue other passions, travel the world, spend time with grandkids?

£4.5m a year is a lot of money, but when you are already a multimillionaire surely there's better stuff you can do with your time than go to a freezing cold training ground in Beckenham every day. He can't take it with him and only has one child to give it to. Surely, you get to a point when you don't need the money anymore. Maybe Mrs Roy wants a Sunseaker?

Given he's in the twilight of his career. Why's he satisfied with such a low level of ambition. Friday night may have been his last opportunity to win a major trophy and we didn't even chase the game.

He had one season to prove a point after his England failure. Now, I cant really see what would motivate him. He's done this all before and isn't going to try anything new. He has got a track record of being stubborn though.

What would you do if you were a 73 year old multimillionaire who'd already had a long career?

Edited by jeeagles (10 Jan 2021 5.03pm)

Have you ever considered that it’s not about the money and that he just loves football ?

 

jeeagles Flag 10 Jan 21 5.39pm

Originally posted by EddieMac
Have you ever considered that it’s not about the money and that he just loves football ?

Obviously.

 

eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 10 Jan 21 5.58pm

Originally posted by dave4343palace

Roy won't be sacked because he will achieve the objective of his employers. The Yanks wouldn't care less if every single one of the remaining 21 games finished 0-0 this season.

TBF, id snap your hand off if this was the case.

Prem status secured, golden gloves for Guiata, 10th-12th finish, oh, downside being a 2yr contract for RH.

Thankfully, we all know that aint never gonna happen

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

PZ Eagle Flag Penzance 10 Jan 21 6.19pm

We could always try for that fantastic Manager Bielsa, You know the one who has just materminded a Leeds defeat against League 2 Crawley Town 0-3.

 


Conjunctivitis.com - A site for sore eyes.

southnorwoodhill Flag 10 Jan 21 6.21pm

Speroni, Ward, Mariappa, Dann, Bolasie, Dikgacoi, Puncheon, Jedinak, Delaney, Gabbidon, Moxey, Ledley, Chamakh, Bannan, Jerome.

These were the players that Pulis attained a 11th place finish with. No Zaha, Cabaye, Benteke, Townsend etc etc.
Hodgson inherited a decent squad, including later signings Sahko, Milivojevic, Schlupp, Van Aanholt, Riedewald. Let's add a few of his own signings: Kouyate, Ayew, Cahill. Notable mention also for Eze and the timely coming good of Wan Bissaka and Mitchell. How is it that he hasn't been able to better Pulis's finish with a squad he says is his best?

Edited by southnorwoodhill (10 Jan 2021 6.28pm)

 

PZ Eagle Flag Penzance 10 Jan 21 6.36pm

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

Speroni, Ward, Mariappa, Dann, Bolasie, Dikgacoi, Puncheon, Jedinak, Delaney, Gabbidon, Moxey, Ledley, Chamakh, Bannan, Jerome.

These were the players that Pulis attained a 11th place finish with. No Zaha, Cabaye, Benteke, Townsend etc etc.
Hodgson inherited a decent squad, including later signings Sahko, Milivojevic, Schlupp, Van Aanholt, Riedewald. Let's add a few of his own signings: Kouyate, Ayew, Cahill. Notable mention also for Eze and the timely coming good of Wan Bissaka and Mitchell. How is it that he hasn't been able to better Pulis's finish with a squad he says is his best?

Edited by southnorwoodhill (10 Jan 2021 6.28pm)

The season is not over yet!

 


Conjunctivitis.com - A site for sore eyes.

doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 10 Jan 21 8.05pm

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

Speroni, Ward, Mariappa, Dann, Bolasie, Dikgacoi, Puncheon, Jedinak, Delaney, Gabbidon, Moxey, Ledley, Chamakh, Bannan, Jerome.

These were the players that Pulis attained a 11th place finish with. No Zaha, Cabaye, Benteke, Townsend etc etc.
Hodgson inherited a decent squad, including later signings Sahko, Milivojevic, Schlupp, Van Aanholt, Riedewald. Let's add a few of his own signings: Kouyate, Ayew, Cahill. Notable mention also for Eze and the timely coming good of Wan Bissaka and Mitchell. How is it that he hasn't been able to better Pulis's finish with a squad he says is his best?

Edited by southnorwoodhill (10 Jan 2021 6.28pm)


Perhaps because the other clubs in the league also have their best squads mainly because they've spent more money than we4 have.

 

Elwissthebest Flag Marlborough 10 Jan 21 8.16pm

'The season is not over yet!'

Really? It feels as if it is. Great Cup run. Top half finish? Dream on. The usual scramble to get to 38 points is what awaits us. Oh, and it would be good if we could beat Brighton. That's all anyone at CPFC's really bothered about (apart from the fans).

SouthNorwoodHill's excellent point about what Pulis achieved with what he had to work with is still to receive a convincing answer.

 

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 10 Jan 21 8.21pm

Originally posted by Elwissthebest

'The season is not over yet!'

Really? It feels as if it is. Great Cup run. Top half finish? Dream on. The usual scramble to get to 38 points is what awaits us. Oh, and it would be good if we could beat Brighton. That's all anyone at CPFC's really bothered about (apart from the fans).

SouthNorwoodHill's excellent point about what Pulis achieved with what he had to work with is still to receive a convincing answer.

I did want to say that Pulis' team looked pretty poor on paper. However, we seemed to have some real guts and glory fighting spirit in that team. We don't seem to have that kind of team now. Although, there are a couple of 'fiery' characters in our squad, like perhaps McArthur and Milo.
Is this the manager's fault? Not 100 percent sure.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Page 83 of 231 < 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > roy out