You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 3 2026 9.05pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)


Page 88 of 261 < 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 >
Stirlingsays Flag 13 May 22 9.42pm

Originally posted by W12

I will watch but please watch this:

[Link]

Edited by W12 (13 May 2022 9.09pm)

I started watching it but I've already seen this stuff from years ago.

There are many explosions within the buildings due to the damage done by the impacts and fire igniting combustibles. For example, some elevators came down that caused fatalities at lobbies.

Explosions and destruction were obviously happening and then you have people in highly stressful situations reacting and trying to make sense of it all.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 May 2022 9.43pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

W12 13 May 22 9.59pm

Originally posted by W12

I will watch but please watch this:

[Link]

Edited by W12 (13 May 2022 9.09pm)

Sorry that’s a long video. I’ll find something much more specific.

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 May 22 10.29pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

This video explained a lot to me about about WTC 7 when I was looking into it all back in the day.

[Link]

Also note how noisy a controlled demolition is, also seen in your video, compared to the lack of charge noise when WTC 7 fell.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 May 2022 8.58pm)

I watched it all live, from the moment the TV stations started reporting a plane had flown into one tower. I saw the second plane hit the second tower, which is when it was obviously not an accident. Then the rescue attempts, with footage from inside the lobbies with sound of bodies hitting the ground outside, and outside of them falling. I don't recall any of it being shown again, as it was too awful. They also had an expert on how structures of that kind would react and he was screaming that they needed to get everyone they could, out and away and to stop any rescue attempts from the upper floors. He knew the intense heat from the fire would cause the steel to melt, at which point the weight of the levels above would cause the collapse. He knew what was going to happen and was proved totally correct. I have no idea what happened to that man, or his testimony, but it puts all the conspiracy theories back in their boxes.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The Dolphin Flag 14 May 22 8.18am

Originally posted by W12

Do you mean the Looming Towers?

Oops!

 

Stirlingsays Flag 14 May 22 8.39am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I watched it all live, from the moment the TV stations started reporting a plane had flown into one tower. I saw the second plane hit the second tower, which is when it was obviously not an accident. Then the rescue attempts, with footage from inside the lobbies with sound of bodies hitting the ground outside, and outside of them falling. I don't recall any of it being shown again, as it was too awful. They also had an expert on how structures of that kind would react and he was screaming that they needed to get everyone they could, out and away and to stop any rescue attempts from the upper floors. He knew the intense heat from the fire would cause the steel to melt, at which point the weight of the levels above would cause the collapse. He knew what was going to happen and was proved totally correct. I have no idea what happened to that man, or his testimony, but it puts all the conspiracy theories back in their boxes.

It was an event that shaped the direction of the world.

I encourage people not to take things at face value and to look at things with fresh eyes. When I looked at 9/11 the vast majority of the conspiracy theories just don't pan out for me.

Other than the Mossad knowing about the attack.

That said, I've no doubt that none of us know the full picture of most that goes on around us.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Teddy Eagle Flag 16 May 22 8.51pm


BBC a bit slow off the mark.

[Link]

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 May 22 6.54am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle


BBC a bit slow off the mark.

[Link]

You beat me to it. Russell Davies is going full in at least if he fails he can say he did it his way.

My guess is that in a few years it wont be Doctor Who but more like Doctor Who?

 


One more point

Teddy Eagle Flag 17 May 22 7.22am

Originally posted by Badger11

You beat me to it. Russell Davies is going full in at least if he fails he can say he did it his way.

My guess is that in a few years it wont be Doctor Who but more like Doctor Who?

Dr Who cares? How long until the backlash against Davies for cynically pandering to different interests?

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 May 22 7.41am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Dr Who cares? How long until the backlash against Davies for cynically pandering to different interests?

I know there are fan sites for the show I wonder how they are feeling about this direction?

 


One more point

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 May 22 8.20am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle


BBC a bit slow off the mark.

[Link]

Surely they should be the doctor? I guess they will reggae up the theme tune now.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Stirlingsays Flag 17 May 22 10.15am

I guess we are on a countdown to Dr Who coming out as 'gay', whatever gender the character is meant to be.

Similar to the ratings, I don't think time will be kind.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Teddy Eagle Flag 17 May 22 10.23am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I guess we are on a countdown to Dr Who coming out as 'gay', whatever gender the character is meant to be.

Similar to the ratings, I don't think time will be kind.

It would show a disappointing lack of imagination on the writer's part though. Dr Who could be attracted to fungus or asteroids or walking sticks or anything - why limit the choice to gender?

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 May 22 10.27am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I guess we are on a countdown to Dr Who coming out as 'gay', whatever gender the character is meant to be.

Similar to the ratings, I don't think time will be kind.

I make no secret of my dislike of the BBC so I'm loving it. The more they are criticised for pandering to minority interest groups whilst ignoring the majority the deeper the whole they dig.

This is so like the left, faced with an obvious challenge to their existence instead of moderating their views to mollify people like me they doubled down.

It would be quite simple for the BBC to make some mainstream cultural shows whilst keeping all their other favourites but no they would rather take a mass entertainment show that was developed for kids and turn it into an activist rights show.

Keep it Auntie the days of the licence fee are numbered the word Lemmings spring to mind.

 


One more point

Stirlingsays Flag 17 May 22 10.42am

Originally posted by Badger11

I make no secret of my dislike of the BBC so I'm loving it. The more they are criticised for pandering to minority interest groups whilst ignoring the majority the deeper the whole they dig.

This is so like the left, faced with an obvious challenge to their existence instead of moderating their views to mollify people like me they doubled down.

It would be quite simple for the BBC to make some mainstream cultural shows whilst keeping all their other favourites but no they would rather take a mass entertainment show that was developed for kids and turn it into an activist rights show.

Keep it Auntie the days of the licence fee are numbered the word Lemmings spring to mind.

Ditto.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

silvertop Flag Portishead 17 May 22 10.45am

Originally posted by Badger11

I make no secret of my dislike of the BBC so I'm loving it. The more they are criticised for pandering to minority interest groups whilst ignoring the majority the deeper the whole they dig.

This is so like the left, faced with an obvious challenge to their existence instead of moderating their views to mollify people like me they doubled down.

It would be quite simple for the BBC to make some mainstream cultural shows whilst keeping all their other favourites but no they would rather take a mass entertainment show that was developed for kids and turn it into an activist rights show.

Keep it Auntie the days of the licence fee are numbered the word Lemmings spring to mind.

As you know I am not anti BBC (World Service, BBC4, 6Music, masses of top educational shows linked with the OU etc.) and they remain wedged between the Equality Act and the Charter, but it is difficult not to disagree with much of what you say.

This is largely self-inflicted.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 May 22 11.58am

Originally posted by silvertop

As you know I am not anti BBC (World Service, BBC4, 6Music, masses of top educational shows linked with the OU etc.) and they remain wedged between the Equality Act and the Charter, but it is difficult not to disagree with much of what you say.

This is largely self-inflicted.

Valid points. I made the comment they are digging a hole for themselves, when they should be looking to placate their viewers,
education is one area.

Instead of spending 80m on BBC3 which nobody watches they should have launched a 24 hour education channel which should cover things like the OU, adult literacy and English for non speakers as some examples.

I would not object to spending money on public broadcasting I don't consider Homes Under The Hammer or Strictly as fitting that bill.

 


One more point

Matov Flag 17 May 22 1.29pm

To be fair to the BBC with regards to the Tranny in Doctor Who then you have to give them a modicum of respect.

Yes, I loathe them and detest all the woke bollocks but if you want to stick two fingers up at Gammons like me, this is the way to do it.

Always admired an opponent who makes no pretence about despising me and giving zero f***s. A far healthier, for all concerned, approach them trying to make a pretence of us somehow being able to reach a compromise.

The BBC knows it is a dead man walking. And like all such people/organisations, you have to give kudos where it is due if they decide to carry on sticking two fingers up at the people they blame for their demise.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Spiderman Flag Horsham 17 May 22 5.00pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Valid points. I made the comment they are digging a hole for themselves, when they should be looking to placate their viewers,
education is one area.

Instead of spending 80m on BBC3 which nobody watches they should have launched a 24 hour education channel which should cover things like the OU, adult literacy and English for non speakers as some examples.

I would not object to spending money on public broadcasting I don't consider Homes Under The Hammer or Strictly as fitting that bill.

I agree. Why not have their own sports channel, doesn’t have to be up and running all the time but during WC etc it would leave BBC 1 and 2 to those that don’t like sports

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 May 22 5.22pm

Originally posted by Matov

To be fair to the BBC with regards to the Tranny in Doctor Who then you have to give them a modicum of respect.

Yes, I loathe them and detest all the woke bollocks but if you want to stick two fingers up at Gammons like me, this is the way to do it.

Always admired an opponent who makes no pretence about despising me and giving zero f***s. A far healthier, for all concerned, approach them trying to make a pretence of us somehow being able to reach a compromise.

The BBC knows it is a dead man walking. And like all such people/organisations, you have to give kudos where it is due if they decide to carry on sticking two fingers up at the people they blame for their demise.

I agree but I doubt the BBC thinks it is going to lose the licence. They will wake up (not woke up) when it is too late.

 


One more point

nhp61 Flag Goring-By-Sea born, now in Brackne... 17 May 22 8.35pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Ditto.

Ditto for me as well

I rarely watch any of the terrestrial channels, BBC, ITV, Channels 4 and 5, these days as the standard of their output is awful.

The BBC & ITV seem to be obsessed with "Celebrity" shows, and, particularly in regard to the BBC, obsessed with whatever they think is the cause of the day, be it racism, climate change, mental health, LBGT, etc.

I am not saying that these are not worthy causes, but ramming them down our throats can end up being counterproductive in the long term.

Edited by nhp61 (17 May 2022 8.37pm)

 

Page 88 of 261 < 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)