This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Was it mutual agreement then? Otherwise, my point stands. No it doesn’t Not unless you are an employment lawyer There is still a requirement to mitigate the loss Jeez
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
No it doesn’t Not unless you are an employment lawyer There is still a requirement to mitigate the loss Jeez So, they sacked him. Who's loss needs mitigating? Not Chelsea's. You think his agent allowed him to sign a contract which gave him no control if he was sacked? Jeez
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
So, they sacked him. Who's loss needs mitigating? Not Chelsea's. You think his agent allowed him to sign a contract which gave him no control if he was sacked? Jeez Oh FFS Look, I do this for a living He got sacked. His contract was breached. By contract law you can claim for your loss but are required to take all possible steps to mitigate the loss. There will have been a termination agreement in place for sure. It will take cognisance of that element of the law.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Oh FFS Look, I do this for a living He got sacked. His contract was breached. By contract law you can claim for your loss but are required to take all possible steps to mitigate the loss. There will have been a termination agreement in place for sure. It will take cognisance of that element of the law. Oh FFS It would not include not getting another job. That would be taking away a livelihood. Any two bob lawyer would rip that to bits.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Oh FFS It would not include not getting another job. That would be taking away a livelihood. Any two bob lawyer would rip that to bits. You can get another job and are required to try to Then the income from that job is taken into account in your claim for damages as you had less damage.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
deleted 25 ![]() |
|
---|---|
I'd have thought some Chelsea fans would have put Frank off coming to us Along the lines of - 'don't fcuk my ex'
|
|
![]() |
deleted 25 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Got to say that when it comes too choosing a manager we are consistent - as in clueless I'd go with Howe or Lampard. If they don't want the job - let us know ffs Cooper and Dyche are in employment- leave them alone
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Elphers40
I saw the reported figures it would cost to secure Dyche - and thought “blimey that’s a lot” ! Then I thought about it for a while I want Dyche as I think he’d surprise a few people with the style of play.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
no shortage of two bob lawyers in here by the look of it LOL Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Oh FFS It would not include not getting another job. That would be taking away a livelihood. Any two bob lawyer would rip that to bits.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Any update Dazza? The betting markets would suggest Lampard is no longer in the frame ? I think he was heavily odds on but is now around 6-1. Personally i don't think any of the ones currently in the frame ( Dyche, Howe, Cooper, or Lampard ) are going to be the answer. I think Big fat Sam is the one i would be trying to get - knows what is required to survive in the EPL and has a good take on our current squad.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
You can get another job and are required to try to Then the income from that job is taken into account in your claim for damages as you had less damage. Mapletree is right. When Lampard's contract was terminated Chelsea and his lawyers will have started a process of agreeing compensation. As it is a fixed term contract he may have right to claim the total of rest of contract. What is likely is a terminal payment was agreed as either an interim or final solution which stipulated he could not take another job in epl till a certain date. He is effectively on gardening leave
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I think the £3m is neither here nor there, for reasons dealt with above. We did pay Mike Ashley for Pardew - possibly the £5m quoted. If somebody said we could have a mid range Premier League player for £3m - say Harry Winks - it would be a no brainer. The manager is crucial at all levels. Evidence last night.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.