You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US election
October 31 2026 12.15pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

US election


Page 9 of 18 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >
susmik Flag PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 09 Nov 16 3.47pm

I see Hilary did not give her Potential Concession speech as planned!:

[Link]

 


Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky.

OknotOK Flag Cockfosters, London 09 Nov 16 4.01pm

Originally posted by Rubin

Ok, looking elsewhere it appears the smears bit could be tenuous, but it's a bit wrong in my opinion to claim you're a president for children and women when you're prepared to knowingly defend a guilty child rapist.

With regards to the emails, again, we'll have to wait and see what happens, but it's come out that she instructed her maiden to print classified emails for her [Link] which could spell trouble. She also 'couldn't remember' a lot of things during the investigation [Link] , and now that she's not running for the presidency, the FBI might not be as lenient (the case is still open).

The smear was more than tenuous. It was factually incorrect. She was a public defender who was assigned a case and followed the consitutional right for an individual to have representation. Anything else is just bollocks.

As I said, on the emails I think I have less sympathy. And yes getting the maid to print stuff off (who have never been vetted and I believe the FBI have been obstructed from interviewing) may constitute inappropriate behaviour (illegal?).

HRC was a poor candidate. Her saving grace was meant to be that she was against an even worse one.

Given the turnout in this election was down to 2000 levels and the candidates picked up materially less votes than their predecessors (Trump 2m less than Romney, HRC 6m less than Obama) I think it is fair to say that neither of them come out looking good. But in the end he walks into the WH.

In the long run it may be benefical for the Democrats. Changing demographics still favour them (Texas for example will be in play within the next decade) and they can now try and find a genuinely exciting candidate.

Plus the Donald will likely be frustrated at every turn. He is naturally a socially liberal, despite what he has said. And that the Senate and Congress will block. And he is a fiscal conservative but wants protectionism, which the Senate and Congress will block.

He's going to have to fight to get through his reform packages and in 2 years time the houses may be winnable for the Democrats. Then 2 more years of completely frustrated Trump and a 2020 defeat. In the long run the Republicans have to find a way to win in a new environment. This election defeat was meant to give them the impetus to do that soul searching. Instead they've won and it's the Dems who will go away and regroup.

Edited by OknotOK (09 Nov 2016 4.06pm)

 


"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show

soulboy Flag Lewisham 09 Nov 16 4.17pm

Originally posted by Michaelawt85

The lazy arguments all over social media that America has showed itself as racist. Not everyone who voted for trump is a racist, not every one would have voted for reasons of race. There are so many more factors at play and as I say the Clinton era probably has a lot to do with it.

I wouldn't bet against Michelle Obama being a democrat candidate one day

Make that President. Will probably run against Pence in 4 year's time....

 


"Deviance is a freedom enjoyed in a city of lightly engaged strangers"

Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 09 Nov 16 4.20pm

Originally posted by OknotOK

The smear was more than tenuous. It was factually incorrect. She was a public defender who was assigned a case and followed the consitutional right for an individual to have representation. Anything else is just bollocks.

As I said, on the emails I think I have less sympathy. And yes getting the maid to print stuff off (who have never been vetted and I believe the FBI have been obstructed from interviewing) may constitute inappropriate behaviour (illegal?).

HRC was a poor candidate. Her saving grace was meant to be that she was against an even worse one.

Given the turnout in this election was down to 2000 levels and the candidates picked up materially less votes than their predecessors (Trump 2m less than Romney, HRC 6m less than Obama) I think it is fair to say that neither of them come out looking good. But in the end he walks into the WH.

In the long run it may be benefical for the Democrats. Changing demographics still favour them (Texas for example will be in play within the next decade) and they can now try and find a genuinely exciting candidate.

Plus the Donald will likely be frustrated at every turn. He is naturally a socially liberal, despite what he has said. And that the Senate and Congress will block. And he is a fiscal conservative but wants protectionism, which the Senate and Congress will block.

He's going to have to fight to get through his reform packages and in 2 years time the houses may be winnable for the Democrats. Then 2 more years of completely frustrated Trump and a 2020 defeat. In the long run the Republicans have to find a way to win in a new environment. This election defeat was meant to give them the impetus to do that soul searching. Instead they've won and it's the Dems who will go away and regroup.

Edited by OknotOK (09 Nov 2016 4.06pm)

Great post.

I think the tensions between the President and Congress which notionally gives the Republicans complete control may prove very interesting

 

twist Flag Miami, Florida 09 Nov 16 4.22pm

Originally posted by Rubin

Ok, looking elsewhere it appears the smears bit could be tenuous, but it's a bit wrong in my opinion to claim you're a president for children and women when you're prepared to knowingly defend a guilty child rapist.

With regards to the emails, again, we'll have to wait and see what happens, but it's come out that she instructed her maiden to print classified emails for her [Link] which could spell trouble. She also 'couldn't remember' a lot of things during the investigation [Link] , and now that she's not running for the presidency, the FBI might not be as lenient (the case is still open).

OK, she was a public defender, she was assigned to the case despite her protests.
The Lab lost the only evidence the prosecution had in the case, she laughed in disbelief at that fact they lost the only evidence, says as much on the tape. The Prosecution then approaches her and asks for a plea deal, and despite knowing they have no evidence, she convinces the guy to accept the lesser charge anyway.
You could say she took a child molester off the streets for a couple of years as the prosecution would likely have failed.
Or you can say she cruely defended a child rapist and laughed in the childs face aftwerards, depending on what you really want to believe.

 

regal_eagle Flag somewhere 09 Nov 16 4.25pm

Originally posted by Sedlescombe
Elizabeth Warren?

Not sure I'd grab her by the pu**y.
...I am allowed to say that now, aren't I?!?

Mind you, it'd be impossible to grab Michelle there if you believe the conspiracies...

 

Sportyteacher Flag London 09 Nov 16 4.26pm

Originally posted by Sedlescombe

Which criminal and immoral matters are they?

How about Clinton Foundation that is a non-profit making organisation of charitable status with millions being hived of to...guess who? Much more than just that, including political favours made possible via unscrupulous means:

[Link]

In the meantime, Trump's pledge of rebuilding America esp. where its finances are concerned, could've been aided by the new President if he hadn't chosen to embroil himself within tax avoidance scheming. Will he choose now to close such loopholes?

[Link]

It all reads as being not that dissimilar to Westminster.

 

Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 09 Nov 16 4.32pm

Originally posted by twist

OK, she was a public defender, she was assigned to the case despite her protests.
The Lab lost the only evidence the prosecution had in the case, she laughed in disbelief at that fact they lost the only evidence, says as much on the tape. The Prosecution then approaches her and asks for a plea deal, and despite knowing they have no evidence, she convinces the guy to accept the lesser charge anyway.
You could say she took a child molester off the streets for a couple of years as the prosecution would likely have failed.
Or you can say she cruely defended a child rapist and laughed in the childs face aftwerards, depending on what you really want to believe.


God knows why I am defending lawyers but here goes. A lawyer doesn't "cruely defend" their client any more than all prosecution lawyers are desperate to lock up innocent peoples. Both sides get to have legal representation and argue their case.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 09 Nov 16 5.29pm

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

patronising my *rse ... you don't have to be a pseudo intellectual bleeding heart liberal to be depressed at having a psycho pussy grabber as president. Either introduce an IQ test to disbar brainless freaks from voting or have some jury service element brought into democracy ... old fashioned REPRESENTATIVE democracy is failing, it's being subverted by a conspiracy of evil jokers and morons. I like and respect thoughtful open-minded people from whatever class thy choose to be identified with, but sod democracy - Trumpers should all definitely be shot - not all Brexiteers mind, just most of them

Lol. In other words, you like people who agree with you or....people who are the exact opposite of yourself judging by this post.

 

Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 09 Nov 16 5.46pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

Tell me, what does Michelle Obama stand for and what are her policies?

Don't know, don't care as they aren't relevant to why I thought it wasn't a bad shout to think she might stand next time around.

6/10 Matt, can do better.

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 09 Nov 16 7.38pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Lol. In other words, you like people who agree with you or....people who are the exact opposite of yourself judging by this post.

here are some facts mate, not opinions - FACTS: 2 + 2 = 4, the sun will come up tomorrow, Trumnp is an evil sh*t head, anyone who tolerates him is either of the above two or most probably both. You laugh away - petty arguments on serious issues which very few of us have the wherewithal to do anything about don't interest me. I was being a bit jokey - I respect the opinion of Brexiteers a la Voltaire, not Trumpers though, hence my selective leniency in the choice of who is to be lined up against the wall (now there's a wall I'd happily see built) - but I do not some of the bile that was released after the leave vote, and I think the broadcasters were being spontaneous rather than selective when they did their vox pops after both votes - and the Trumpers and Brexiteers do have a distinct aura of the pikey about them. Onwards and downwards!

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 09 Nov 16 9.27pm

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

here are some facts mate, not opinions - FACTS: 2 + 2 = 4, the sun will come up tomorrow, Trumnp is an evil sh*t head, anyone who tolerates him is either of the above two or most probably both. You laugh away - petty arguments on serious issues which very few of us have the wherewithal to do anything about don't interest me. I was being a bit jokey - I respect the opinion of Brexiteers a la Voltaire, not Trumpers though, hence my selective leniency in the choice of who is to be lined up against the wall (now there's a wall I'd happily see built) - but I do not some of the bile that was released after the leave vote, and I think the broadcasters were being spontaneous rather than selective when they did their vox pops after both votes - and the Trumpers and Brexiteers do have a distinct aura of the pikey about them. Onwards and downwards!

Lovely.

 

matt_himself Flag Matataland 09 Nov 16 9.27pm

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

Don't know, don't care as they aren't relevant to why I thought it wasn't a bad shout to think she might stand next time around.

6/10 Matt, can do better.

Thank you. Your answer speaks for itself.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Mstrobez Flag 09 Nov 16 9.34pm

Anyone else think that Trump didn't actually want to win? Just wanted to create the biggest political s*** storm Americas ever seen and coin it for years afterwards?

Either way, watching it all unfold over the past few months just confirms how comedically stupid Americans actually are.

 


We're the Arthur over ere!

matt_himself Flag Matataland 09 Nov 16 9.36pm

Anyone wishing for a laugh today, I recommend reading the Guardian website. It is in absolute meltdown following Trump's election, from columnists to commentators to the virtue signallers whom crowd its opinion function.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 09 Nov 16 9.40pm

Originally posted by Mstrobez

Anyone else think that Trump didn't actually want to win? Just wanted to create the biggest political s*** storm Americas ever seen and coin it for years afterwards?

Either way, watching it all unfold over the past few months just confirms how comedically stupid Americans actually are.

I found it strange that a billionaire would want a less than 200 grand a year job. Trump already has a plane too so Air Force One has little appeal. Can't be the perks of feeling up or shagging interns because he seems to have done enough of that kind of thing already.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Mstrobez Flag 09 Nov 16 9.43pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I found it strange that a billionaire would want a less than 200 grand a year job. Trump already has a plane too so Air Force One has little appeal. Can't be the perks of feeling up or shagging interns because he seems to have done enough of that kind of thing already.

And for someone who's been so successful in business, which requires communication skills, he seemed to lack them hugely. Almost as if his aim was to really gain support and devotion from the highest earners but piss off the majority. Suppose we won't ever know but if this was the plan he probably should've considered how shambolic the opposition was first.

Edited by Mstrobez (09 Nov 2016 9.44pm)

 


We're the Arthur over ere!

.TUX. Flag 09 Nov 16 9.53pm

Many many people are unhappy, and rightly so.
Vote Trump and there's a slim possibility of change. Vote Clinton and there's no chance.

Slim > none.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 09 Nov 16 10.27pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I found it strange that a billionaire would want a less than 200 grand a year job. Trump already has a plane too so Air Force One has little appeal. Can't be the perks of feeling up or shagging interns because he seems to have done enough of that kind of thing already.

Mike Bloomberg Billionaire many times over worked for a Dollar a year when he was NYCs Mayor.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 09 Nov 16 10.39pm

Originally posted by soulboy

Make that President. Will probably run against Pence in 4 year's time....

No chance. Elizabeth Warren will though.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Page 9 of 18 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US election