What in the name of f*** is that exactly?

You have to laugh at some of Starmer's front bench appointments.

Naz Shah shared and liked a tweet saying child rape victims should 'shut their mouths for the good of diversity', she's also had past antisemitic issues.

Shah is now on Labour's front bench for community cohesion.

Jess Phillips, who once said she'd 'stab' Corbyn in the front, if he let her down on policies.....Starmer's made her Shadow Minister for Domestic Violence and Safeguarding.

The modern day Labour party are basically a parody and the absurdity is going to be fun.

What in the name of f*** is that exactly?

Something to do with glue sniffing?

that's 'adhesion' - some furious googling going on, some jokers on the labour front bench? Nobody as serious as Priti Patel or Jacob Rees Mogg? Starmer is Blair mark 2 and will eventually disappoint the lefties, they're all tories really you see, but he'll make Labour electable and quicker than some of you would like to believe, he's no mug and is the first decent leader Labour have had since Brown - that's the danger of party democracy it ignores the fact that a substantial proportion of any political party membership is made up of nutters - hence Ian Duncan Smith and Milliband/Corbyn - Starmer's strategy will be spot on and his appointments will favour talent and send out the message he thinks needs sending. So beware Tory boys, underestimate Starmer at your peril, he's a serious operator for serious times and the voters will respect him. I want to hear Labour on reintroducing a mixed economy where private companies acting as monopolies DO NOT make our infrastructure expensive and inefficient, a situation borne of Thatcherism carried out by BOTH parties.

noooo that's a market economy if I remember from my Economics O Level, then there's a planned economy (communism or fascism (corporatism)), then there's a mixed economy which is what intelligent countries have, and then there's this hybrid private-public mess where natural monopolies are private (a disaster) instead of state-owned so you get a gravy train for unaccountable leaders to over-pay themselves and under-invest in whatever national asset they're in charge of which is what besets us atm - Carillion are the prime example - it's bankruptcy meant hospitals and schools didn't get built while the board paid itself millions in bonuses and faced no penalty for bleeding the funds to the point where the company collapsed - Starmer's thoughts on bank reform will be of interest too.

noooo that's a market economy if I remember from my Economics O Level, then there's a planned economy (communism or fascism (corporatism)), then there's a mixed economy which is what intelligent countries have, and then there's this hybrid private-public mess where natural monopolies are private (a disaster) instead of state-owned so you get a gravy train for unaccountable leaders to over-pay themselves and under-invest in whatever national asset they're in charge of which is what besets us atm - Carillion are the prime example - it's bankruptcy meant hospitals and schools didn't get built while the board paid itself millions in bonuses and faced no penalty for bleeding the funds to the point where the company collapsed - Starmer's thoughts on bank reform will be of interest too.

Make Labour electable or actually win a majority in Parliament in 2024?

Correct in 1992 but little used by the tories.
Labour then went mad with it from 2000. Left sectors with billions of burden still to this day.