Charlie Austin (papertalk)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 91 of 104 < 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 >

black eagle. south croydon. 03 Jan 16 11.01am
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03 Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 10.47am Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 10.04am Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 7.13am Quote black eagle. at 01 Jan 2016 10.33pm Be nice to see Charlie sitting in the stand next to Steve Parish on Sunday No it wouldn't. Over priced, over rated, and thank god over the other side of the stream, lets hope he stays there. How can you say his overpriced when you or none off us know the transfer fee. Maybe we could do a swap deal with campbell plus cash,goalscorers cost money unless their contracts run out which in Austins case applys as his contract runs out in the summer. if he doesn't go this month he'll go on a free in the summer and there'll be a list of clubs as long as your arm wanting him. Austin to Palace in Jan or in the summer on a free hell yeah. Really, where have you been, QPR have said more than once they wont let him go for less than £8m. That's silly money for a player with less than 6 playing months on his contract, no club is going to pay that not knowing whether they can get value, especially as he is injury prone. £8 million is not silly money for a proven goalscorer,this would be a good deal for us and for Austin as he would'nt have to move house. selling the club to him would be easy as we are putting the infrastructure in place and we have more of a decent chance of europe this season. i find it strange that people don't want a player who hit 18 goals last season. yes his had injuries but so has Connor Wickham,players get injured it's a part off the game.
Alert a moderator to this post

black eagle.

south croydon. 03 Jan 16 11.01am

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03

Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 10.47am

Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 10.04am

Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 7.13am

Quote black eagle. at 01 Jan 2016 10.33pm

Be nice to see Charlie sitting in the stand next to Steve Parish on Sunday

No it wouldn't.

Over priced, over rated, and thank god over the other side of the stream, lets hope he stays there.

How can you say his overpriced when you or none off us know the transfer fee.

Maybe we could do a swap deal with campbell plus cash,goalscorers cost money unless their contracts run out which in Austins case applys as his contract runs out in the summer.

if he doesn't go this month he'll go on a free in the summer and there'll be a list of clubs as long as your arm wanting him.

Austin to Palace in Jan or in the summer on a free hell yeah.

Really, where have you been, QPR have said more than once they wont let him go for less than £8m.

That's silly money for a player with less than 6 playing months on his contract, no club is going to pay that not knowing whether they can get value, especially as he is injury prone.

£8 million is not silly money for a proven goalscorer,this would be a good deal for us and for Austin as he would'nt have to move house.

selling the club to him would be easy as we are putting the infrastructure in place and we have more of a decent chance of europe this season.

i find it strange that people don't want a player who hit 18 goals last season.

yes his had injuries but so has Connor Wickham,players get injured it's a part off the game.

Alert a moderator to this post

kevlee born Wandsworth emigrated to Lanc... 03 Jan 16 11.05am
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03 Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 10.47am Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 10.04am Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 7.13am Quote black eagle. at 01 Jan 2016 10.33pm Be nice to see Charlie sitting in the stand next to Steve Parish on Sunday No it wouldn't. Over priced, over rated, and thank god over the other side of the stream, lets hope he stays there. How can you say his overpriced when you or none off us know the transfer fee. Maybe we could do a swap deal with campbell plus cash,goalscorers cost money unless their contracts run out which in Austins case applys as his contract runs out in the summer. if he doesn't go this month he'll go on a free in the summer and there'll be a list of clubs as long as your arm wanting him. Austin to Palace in Jan or in the summer on a free hell yeah. Really, where have you been, QPR have said more than once they wont let him go for less than £8m. That's silly money for a player with less than 6 playing months on his contract, no club is going to pay that not knowing whether they can get value, especially as he is injury prone. No, QPR have said they wont let him go for less than £15m!!! So please don't make me laugh, and as for the bloke - who said my post was embarrassing - if you want to pay £15m for a guy playing for a team 16th in the Championship your welcome - just don't sign him for palace. Following Palace since 25 Feb 1978
Alert a moderator to this post

kevlee

born Wandsworth emigrated to Lanc... 03 Jan 16 11.05am

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03

Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 10.47am

Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 10.04am

Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 7.13am

Quote black eagle. at 01 Jan 2016 10.33pm

Be nice to see Charlie sitting in the stand next to Steve Parish on Sunday

No it wouldn't.

Over priced, over rated, and thank god over the other side of the stream, lets hope he stays there.

How can you say his overpriced when you or none off us know the transfer fee.

Maybe we could do a swap deal with campbell plus cash,goalscorers cost money unless their contracts run out which in Austins case applys as his contract runs out in the summer.

if he doesn't go this month he'll go on a free in the summer and there'll be a list of clubs as long as your arm wanting him.

Austin to Palace in Jan or in the summer on a free hell yeah.

Really, where have you been, QPR have said more than once they wont let him go for less than £8m.

That's silly money for a player with less than 6 playing months on his contract, no club is going to pay that not knowing whether they can get value, especially as he is injury prone.

No, QPR have said they wont let him go for less than £15m!!!
So please don't make me laugh, and as for the bloke - who said my post was embarrassing - if you want to pay £15m for a guy playing for a team 16th in the Championship your welcome - just don't sign him for palace.

Following Palace since 25 Feb 1978

Alert a moderator to this post

Jaha 03 Jan 16 11.11am
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03 I think Austin would be a good signing for us, as he knows how to score goals. Last year I wouldhave jumped at the chance to sign him especially, and wouldnt be upset now. But, with Connor wickham already a mainstay on the physio table, we can't have another injury prone striker. Edited by Jaha (03 Jan 2016 11.11am)
Alert a moderator to this post

Jaha

03 Jan 16 11.11am

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03

I think Austin would be a good signing for us, as he knows how to score goals. Last year I wouldhave jumped at the chance to sign him especially, and wouldnt be upset now. But, with Connor wickham already a mainstay on the physio table, we can't have another injury prone striker.

Edited by Jaha (03 Jan 2016 11.11am)

Alert a moderator to this post

Sg Bilko Deurne Holland 03 Jan 16 12.20pm
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03 Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 11.01am Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 10.47am Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 10.04am Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 7.13am Quote black eagle. at 01 Jan 2016 10.33pm Be nice to see Charlie sitting in the stand next to Steve Parish on Sunday No it wouldn't. Over priced, over rated, and thank god over the other side of the stream, lets hope he stays there. How can you say his overpriced when you or none off us know the transfer fee. Maybe we could do a swap deal with campbell plus cash,goalscorers cost money unless their contracts run out which in Austins case applys as his contract runs out in the summer. if he doesn't go this month he'll go on a free in the summer and there'll be a list of clubs as long as your arm wanting him. Austin to Palace in Jan or in the summer on a free hell yeah. Really, where have you been, QPR have said more than once they wont let him go for less than £8m. That's silly money for a player with less than 6 playing months on his contract, no club is going to pay that not knowing whether they can get value, especially as he is injury prone. £8 million is not silly money for a proven goalscorer,this would be a good deal for us and for Austin as he would'nt have to move house. selling the club to him would be easy as we are putting the infrastructure in place and we have more of a decent chance of europe this season. i find it strange that people don't want a player who hit 18 goals last season. yes his had injuries but so has Connor Wickham,players get injured it's a part off the game. No it's not silly money for a player with more than 6 months left on their contract, why do you think the likes of Newcastle, Leicester, West Ham, and Tottenham, all lost interest over the summer, because the price tag was too high.
Alert a moderator to this post

Sg Bilko

Deurne Holland 03 Jan 16 12.20pm

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03

Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 11.01am

Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 10.47am

Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 10.04am

Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 7.13am

Quote black eagle. at 01 Jan 2016 10.33pm

Be nice to see Charlie sitting in the stand next to Steve Parish on Sunday

No it wouldn't.

Over priced, over rated, and thank god over the other side of the stream, lets hope he stays there.

How can you say his overpriced when you or none off us know the transfer fee.

Maybe we could do a swap deal with campbell plus cash,goalscorers cost money unless their contracts run out which in Austins case applys as his contract runs out in the summer.

if he doesn't go this month he'll go on a free in the summer and there'll be a list of clubs as long as your arm wanting him.

Austin to Palace in Jan or in the summer on a free hell yeah.

Really, where have you been, QPR have said more than once they wont let him go for less than £8m.

That's silly money for a player with less than 6 playing months on his contract, no club is going to pay that not knowing whether they can get value, especially as he is injury prone.

£8 million is not silly money for a proven goalscorer,this would be a good deal for us and for Austin as he would'nt have to move house.

selling the club to him would be easy as we are putting the infrastructure in place and we have more of a decent chance of europe this season.

i find it strange that people don't want a player who hit 18 goals last season.

yes his had injuries but so has Connor Wickham,players get injured it's a part off the game.

No it's not silly money for a player with more than 6 months left on their contract, why do you think the likes of Newcastle, Leicester, West Ham, and Tottenham, all lost interest over the summer, because the price tag was too high.

Alert a moderator to this post

steven_t92 Orpington 03 Jan 16 4.54pm
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03 If we don't get him this month there's no way we'll get him in the summer, the wages he'll be offered by the teams above us will be way too much for us. He's worth 8mil if that's the fee, forget when his contract expires because it won't effect us.
Alert a moderator to this post

steven_t92

Orpington 03 Jan 16 4.54pm

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03

If we don't get him this month there's no way we'll get him in the summer, the wages he'll be offered by the teams above us will be way too much for us. He's worth 8mil if that's the fee, forget when his contract expires because it won't effect us.

Alert a moderator to this post

rikz Croydon 03 Jan 16 5.42pm
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03 Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 12.20pm Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 11.01am Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 10.47am Quote black eagle. at 03 Jan 2016 10.04am Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 7.13am Quote black eagle. at 01 Jan 2016 10.33pm Be nice to see Charlie sitting in the stand next to Steve Parish on Sunday No it wouldn't. Over priced, over rated, and thank god over the other side of the stream, lets hope he stays there. How can you say his overpriced when you or none off us know the transfer fee. Maybe we could do a swap deal with campbell plus cash,goalscorers cost money unless their contracts run out which in Austins case applys as his contract runs out in the summer. if he doesn't go this month he'll go on a free in the summer and there'll be a list of clubs as long as your arm wanting him. Austin to Palace in Jan or in the summer on a free hell yeah. Really, where have you been, QPR have said more than once they wont let him go for less than £8m. That's silly money for a player with less than 6 playing months on his contract, no club is going to pay that not knowing whether they can get value, especially as he is injury prone. £8 million is not silly money for a proven goalscorer,this would be a good deal for us and for Austin as he would'nt have to move house. selling the club to him would be easy as we are putting the infrastructure in place and we have more of a decent chance of europe this season. i find it strange that people don't want a player who hit 18 goals last season. yes his had injuries but so has Connor Wickham,players get injured it's a part off the game. No it's not silly money for a player with more than 6 months left on their contract, why do you think the likes of Newcastle, Leicester, West Ham, and Tottenham, all lost interest over the summer, because the price tag was too high. You mean the same tottenham who had a 12 million bid accepted by Burnley for ings last January, forget about the contract situation, 8 million is not a lot of money for a player who's proven at this level. If it means we get him before another club has a chance to talk to him then it's money well spent, I agree about the injuries but paying big money for an unproven foreigner is an even bigger gamble.
Alert a moderator to this post

rikz

Croydon 03 Jan 16 5.42pm

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Charlie Austin (rumour)' by james03

Quote Sg Bilko at 03 Jan 2016 12.20pm