This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Matov
I suspect if any individual can only converse in this b****** form of English then reading is not a skill they possess anyway. Funnily enough, in Hawaii (and probably elsewhere) you can buy a book with the title: Da Jesus Book. It is the pidgin English version of the New Testament…
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
has the BBC fallen out of love with the straight White British Man ? Well the boy Lineker seems to do alright out of the licence fee.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Originally posted by YT
Well the boy Lineker seems to do alright out of the licence fee. He black though; or so he thinks
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Correct on both points. A little late returning to this debate, but actually wrong on the language point but correct on the payment point. 75 million people speak pidgin, thus it can only be a language. That's 75 million more people the BBC are reaching. There is always debate as to whether cash should have go here or there and I have heard your thought on this. For my part, money well spent.
|
|
| W12 27 Jun 22 2.17pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
A little late returning to this debate, but actually wrong on the language point but correct on the payment point. 75 million people speak pidgin, thus it can only be a language. That's 75 million more people the BBC are reaching. There is always debate as to whether cash should have go here or there and I have heard your thought on this. For my part, money well spent. 75 million people speak English badly. Edited by W12 (27 Jun 2022 2.17pm)
|
|
| W12 27 Jun 22 2.19pm | |
|---|---|
|
The BBC is just a mouthpiece for globalist interests:
|
|
|
Probably 25m of those live in the UK . . .
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
| W12 27 Jun 22 3.21pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
Probably 25m of those live in the UK . . . Aint dat da trute
|
|
|
Originally posted by W12
Aint dat da trute Blood
|
|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
A little late returning to this debate, but actually wrong on the language point but correct on the payment point. 75 million people speak pidgin, thus it can only be a language. That's 75 million more people the BBC are reaching. There is always debate as to whether cash should have go here or there and I have heard your thought on this. For my part, money well spent. As it is English, would it not be a dialect? Although, I have heard it called a language.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
As it is English, would it not be a dialect? Although, I have heard it called a language. a fella whose home village all mutter & mumble a pigeon English ? they will still all understand the telly News in RP or the latest Hollywood flick. and they will still be confounded by all the BBC's lefty shyte
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
But yet that is how they speak it. And communicate with it. And understand each other when doing so. QED it's a language. And whether you like it or not, the teeny expense of translation is fully justified to reach out to a wider audience - especially this article with a Nigerian element where many Nigerians will understand this more than a standard English article. Once again, how anyone can get upset by this is beyond me, save those who are just feeding their anti BBC bias. And on that - the point about the BBC being a mouthpiece for globalism - please first define what you mean by that term in this context. It is a word with many interpretations, from organisations like the World Wildlife Fund to a thinly veiled white supremacy outlook started by the alt right in the US. Thus, are you saying that the BBC is globalist by reaching out to a wider international audience? Perhaps you could volunteer to start a group willing to get together to pay for it because I’m not sure why I should. The powers that be in this country are incredibly good at spending other peoples money on matters irrelevant to our own wellbeing and to be honest the state we are in we should be doing everything possible to look after number 1.
|
|
| W12 28 Jun 22 10.25am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
But yet that is how they speak it. And communicate with it. And understand each other when doing so. QED it's a language. And whether you like it or not, the teeny expense of translation is fully justified to reach out to a wider audience - especially this article with a Nigerian element where many Nigerians will understand this more than a standard English article. Once again, how anyone can get upset by this is beyond me, save those who are just feeding their anti BBC bias. And on that - the point about the BBC being a mouthpiece for globalism - please first define what you mean by that term in this context. It is a word with many interpretations, from organisations like the World Wildlife Fund to a thinly veiled white supremacy outlook started by the alt right in the US. Thus, are you saying that the BBC is globalist by reaching out to a wider international audience? Globalism is the current ideology of the ruling elite (although I hate that phrase) It is defined by many factors but including: 1. Open borders (free movement of capital, services and people) This is summed up by the books and speeches of Yuval Noah Harari and is very much an ideology (clue is in the "ism" ). The only problem I have with it is, as with all utopian thinking , a complete dystopia in the making. Edited by W12 (28 Jun 2022 10.26am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
Probably 25m of those live in the UK . . . Not officially, of course. I mean, when you walk down the road the sense of white privilege and the overwhelming, overarching oppression that anyone with different skin colour obviously has to face, is palpable.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Not officially, of course. I mean, when you walk down the road the sense of white privilege and the overwhelming, overarching oppression that anyone with different skin colour obviously has to face, is palpable. Hope not Hate. One of the speakers at their event ? the bloke that decapitated Lee Rigby in Greenwich.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
|
Here is some blatant anti-white racism from the BBC....
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.