So we'd stop trading with the EU? No.
It's brought peace? Er, that'd be NATO, guv
Human Rights? That would have happened anyway, as it has in practically every Western nation, where it hasn't been abused to prevent deportation of undesirables.
The beaches? Again, would have happened anyway as we have become more ecologically aware
Freedom of movement? We're not in the Schengen area - you still need a passport

3/10. Must try harder. It's more scaremongering bollocks.

Your question to which I answered referred to 70 years of peace in Europe. My answer is Nato and if you like more specifically article 5.

You dont get it! Stepping stones, that's how it works!

VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again

I think the narrow view is yours old chap.

The one that says there is no other way forward other than to stay in the EU.

And to link football hooligans with politics is insane no?

Your arguments work just as well in reverse.

I appreciate you think my view is narrow my old china

Linking football hooliganism to party politics (as you just did) is indeed insane...linking it on an international level to manifestations of nationalism,is perhaps somewhat more sane.

Its not so much about the best way forward for me.Rather,that Brexit is so manifestly an actual step backwards...

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2016 7.09pm)

If you look at The Study Portal there are lists of all the EU universities that have free degree courses for non-EU students. The EU even pays for distance learning degree courses for non-EU students who are still living in non-EU countries. Most courses are taught in a European language and there are language courses available to prepare non-EU students for the degree courses. Surely this raises expectations of being able to immigrate into the EU. Yet at the same time the EU is spending over 6 billion Euros try to reduce immigration from Africa and the Middle East. In the meantime white working class kids in the UK are more likely to be abducted by aliens than get into university.

VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again

See also:

[Link]

[Link]

It's really not our fault if you just can't be bothered to look for yourself, nor if you do not wish to engage with the material.

From the first link “OK, but what about non-tariff barriers?”, I hear you cry.

I didn't cry this so the bloke is obviously wrong

It's all conjecture and what ifs. Had the articles had citations and evidence, not just opinion, it would have more credence.
I'd have just as much relevant info from Yoffi, the bloke who did fingerbobs imho.

EDIT: Just checked out the author Andrew Lilico, who is somewhat discredited here. [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (12 Jun 2016 8.36pm)

I have to say after watching numerous debates and interviews I have been growing increasingly impressed with Mr Farage and his rationale for voting out. I'm not so keen on his UKIP party but if the vote out win I could see him switching to the Conservative party and I would be very happy.

Errrr. Newflash, you utter simpleton. It is an economic PROJECTION. Perhaps that has too many syllables for you. Let me explain as if you were a child:

He has made some guesses about what might happen in the future.

There are other boys and girls that also did this. They are called the Treasury (no, Kermit, nothing to do with treasure, sorry). They also made guesses about what might happen in the future.

Why do they use all these "ifs" and "coulds", Kermit asks? Because they don't have a crystal fkucking ball.

Idiot.

You'll be disregarding the treasury report as well. It contains plenty of "ifs", "likely" and "coulds".