Quite. And lets not even start about who actually cast it.

Personally I think the only way to settle this now though is a General Election. There is simply no way any deal goes through with May as PM and the House arrayed as it is.

We need a GE with all political parties standing on specific manifesto promises with regards to Brexit. If they want to pronounce themselves in favour of a second referendum or No Deal then lets have it out in the open. And people can vote accordingly.

But this cannot be allowed to continue. It has to be resolved, one way or the other, by October and ideally before hand.

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

That's why we had a referendum. It's not a hard notion to understand.

What is harder to understand is how to deliver on the referendum.

1021 days have passed since that fateful night and we are precisely zero percent closer to enacting Brexit.

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

It's not hard to understand at all. My brochure that cost the government 9 million said we would leave, nothing about a deal. TM said no deal is better than a bad deal, her deal is terrible.
This is a stitch up not hard to understand that!

Even your lefty friends in the Guardian think you are wrong there PP. Do try to keep up.

[Link]

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

And yours trumps over 17m voters in the same timescale.

apart from tons of uneducated men from the Third World as neighbours. Living 50 to a house and driving up property prices.

The average middle aged European woman gains a dozen new suitors to be her boyfriend.

The average 25 year old European woman gets multiple times more attention. Such is globalism.

South London : The fact that at least half the blokes from the third world have abandoned a wife and kids back in their home country is conveniently forgotten.

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Okay, I got the Treaty wrong: the Lisbon Treaty 2009? was the twice one - around only a year between them. I voted no the first time - it was done again. I didn't bother voting as it was clear what the agenda was. Have the referendum until we get the correct result.
Further referendums on europe were then pointless as the no people couldn't be bothered anymore.
I'm interested to see how the Govt will force a European army on Ireland - with neutrality enshrined in the constitution and all that.
Expect an interesting referendum there - or perhaps none at all.
I will admit though, Europe seems to be largely positive for Ireland - except for the years of austerity . Judging by the homeless crisis and the Hard Border threats it seems that Europe is not so enamoured by the Irish anymore.
There is a large difference between Ireland and the UK so far, however, the main one being economic and fiscal. Irealnd has got more back than it has ever put in (although with new accession states this will change). The UK has always paid out more than it received with rebates either given away through concessions or not given for various reasons.
The best bill to the UK from Europe was the bill on the Black economy - funny how the UK was the only country to be full of whore-mongerers and coke heads. Another example of keeping those evil Brits in line. Because Germany and France are a shining example to us all - whereas obviously Britain (perhaps only England) are ingrates.
Despite the fact of having worked all over Europe for 20 years and from personal observation seeing the nationalism in other countries in Europe seem stronger in many other European nations.
No Five Star, Le Front National and only the odd Nazi in England. Loads in Eastern and central Europe - and in Germany and France. But best forget about that as there are clearly going to be no choices for people in these countries: not while there is money to be made anyway.

Red and Blue Army!

Switzerland’s supreme court has overturned a nationwide referendum for the first time in the country’s modern history, on the grounds that the information given to voters was insufficient.

In a ruling that may have some resonance in Britain, where remain campaigners have long argued that voters in the 2016 Brexit referendum were not adequately informed, the court said “incomplete detail and a lack of transparency” had “violated the freedom of the vote”, which could now be re-run.

For 'information given to voters being insufficient' read 'a load of lies'.......

It was a fix the electoral commission has already found it so.

Leave campaign appeal has been withdrawn.

The over-spend of dubious money influenced the vote in favour of leave in the last 24 hours.

'Fromage not Farage'