So, the one player that there is always disagreements about. Constantly left out when people select their own teams before matches and an ongoing debate about whether he contributes enough or should be replaced with Bannan/O'Keefe/Guediora etc.

I'm unsure to be honest. He didn't look fantastic in yesterdays game, but didn't stand out being particularly terrible either. I do prefer O'Keefe and think it's a shame he's been dropped recently.

What do you think?

I thought it extremely telling that Ledley played left back. I suspect 99% of us thought Parr (or Moxey) would start yesterday, with Ledley alongside Jedi in the middle. It speaks volumes about Pulis' opinion of Jedi that he thought it better to play Ledley out of position just to keep KG in the side. Whether or not supporters can see it, he's very clearly the sort of player fellow professionals value highly.

Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

I can't remember tbh but 'they' have to moan about one of ours and it's usually KG, as 'we are goin up' says, he does a lot of the dirty work. It's no coincidence that all the managers have picked him since he's been here.

The reason Ledley played left back was more likely that Pulis doesn't trust Moxey at all and isn't too sure about Parr either. However Ledley wasn't really comfortable at left back so Pulis had to move around with Parr coming on.

Wasn't it a diagonal from Ward flicked on by Chamakh to Bolasie?

I thought he was pretty anonymous again yesterday, and gave the ball away a fair bit (admittedly not as much as Jedinak).

I think replacing KG is the most obvious next step in our progression, and I suspect it will be addressed in the summer window.

Hextable Eagle