Pulis # = 30% possesion + 0 GF + great GK

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Pulis # = 30% possesion + 0 GF + great GK

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

burtmacp 16 Mar 14 10.55am
I thought we only play defensive against "the big boys" Apparently not. We let every team to control the game and wait in the back praying for Saint Jules to save us. How are we going to score goals and save the season? We need to sell back those 16 players that Ian H. purchased and buy 2 strikers. Jules, Ledley and our fans were amazing today.
Alert a moderator to this post

burtmacp

16 Mar 14 10.55am

I thought we only play defensive against "the big boys"
Apparently not. We let every team to control the game and wait in the back praying for Saint Jules to save us.
How are we going to score goals and save the season?
We need to sell back those 16 players that Ian H. purchased and buy 2 strikers.
Jules, Ledley and our fans were amazing today.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 16 Mar 14 11.06am
Pulis = x + y (e - Pi) Surely?
Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 16 Mar 14 11.06am

Pulis = x + y (e - Pi) Surely?

Alert a moderator to this post

Happiness Stan Itchycoo Park 16 Mar 14 11.16am
In interests of balance, please post our possession stats under holloway. Or just wind it in. Your choice. "How can I remember to keep it all together when half the moon is taken away?"
Alert a moderator to this post

Happiness Stan

Itchycoo Park 16 Mar 14 11.16am

Send a Private Message to Happiness Stan

In interests of balance, please post our possession stats under holloway. Or just wind it in. Your choice.

"How can I remember to keep it all together when half the moon is taken away?"

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Mar 14 11.23am
Quote Happiness Stan at 16 Mar 2014 11.16am In interests of balance, please post our possession stats under holloway. Or just wind it in. Your choice. We had more possession under Holloway, largely as a result of having more than one kick off a game. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 16 Mar 14 11.23am

Quote Happiness Stan at 16 Mar 2014 11.16am

In interests of balance, please post our possession stats under holloway. Or just wind it in. Your choice.

We had more possession under Holloway, largely as a result of having more than one kick off a game.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

cpj Kent 16 Mar 14 11.38am
Under Holloway, average possession was 44% including the only game where we have had 50% (Stoke away). Under Millen (including Hull as Pulis was only appointed that day) it was 41%. Under Pulis it is 35%.
Alert a moderator to this post

cpj

Kent 16 Mar 14 11.38am

Under Holloway, average possession was 44% including the only game where we have had 50% (Stoke away).

Under Millen (including Hull as Pulis was only appointed that day) it was 41%.

Under Pulis it is 35%.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 16 Mar 14 11.39am
Feck possession it's about results. When a new man comes in he has to be given the freedom to run things his way.....Pulis is proven and has done a fantastic job so far. Listening to all this Pulis might keep us in the division but we could be playing more attacking or attractive football is like listening to Labour say....The economy might be improving but if we were in charge it would have involved less cuts and it would have improved much quicker.....Mmmmm. Bird in the hand and two in the bush comes to mind. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Mar 2014 11.41am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

16 Mar 14 11.39am

Feck possession it's about results.

When a new man comes in he has to be given the freedom to run things his way.....Pulis is proven and has done a fantastic job so far.

Listening to all this Pulis might keep us in the division but we could be playing more attacking or attractive football is like listening to Labour say....The economy might be improving but if we were in charge it would have involved less cuts and it would have improved much quicker.....Mmmmm.

Bird in the hand and two in the bush comes to mind.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Mar 2014 11.41am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Plane Bromley 16 Mar 14 11.39am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Mar 2014 11.23am Quote Happiness Stan at 16 Mar 2014 11.16am In interests of balance, please post our possession stats under holloway. Or just wind it in. Your choice. We had more possession under Holloway, largely as a result of having more than one kick off a game.
Alert a moderator to this post

Plane

Bromley 16 Mar 14 11.39am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Mar 2014 11.23am

Quote Happiness Stan at 16 Mar 2014 11.16am

In interests of balance, please post our possession stats under holloway. Or just wind it in. Your choice.

We had more possession under Holloway, largely as a result of having more than one kick off a game.

Alert a moderator to this post

cpj Kent 16 Mar 14 11.47am
More stats I've just worked out: Under Holloway: Average shots on target (for): 2.5 Average shots on target against): 5 Average goals scored (for): 0.75 Average goals conceded: 2.25 Under Millen: Average shots on target (for): 3 Average shots on target against): 3 Average goals scored (for): 0.25 Average goals conceded: 1 Under Pulis: Average shots on target (for): 4 Average shots on target against): 4.5 Average goals scored (for): 0.7 Average goals conceded: 1
Alert a moderator to this post

cpj

Kent 16 Mar 14 11.47am

More stats I've just worked out:

Under Holloway:

Average shots on target (for): 2.5
Average shots on target against): 5
Average goals scored (for): 0.75
Average goals conceded: 2.25

Under Millen:

Average shots on target (for): 3
Average shots on target against): 3
Average goals scored (for): 0.25
Average goals conceded: 1

Under Pulis:

Average shots on target (for): 4
Average shots on target against): 4.5
Average goals scored (for): 0.7
Average goals conceded: 1

Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b Landrindod, Wales 16 Mar 14 12.00pm
I wonder what the board thinks. Was TP told,'we just need a manager to keep the club in the prem'. Or we need a manager to organise the side? And are they happy with the way the team is playing? The crunch is if the team are relegated the only style inculcated is that of negatism. Is this sufficient to gain promotion? One thing for certain, a defensive Palace in the prem will sell more tickets than in the championship. That may swing it.
Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b

Landrindod, Wales 16 Mar 14 12.00pm

I wonder what the board thinks. Was TP told,'we just need a manager to keep the club in the prem'. Or we need a manager to organise the side? And are they happy with the way the team is playing? The crunch is if the team are relegated the only style inculcated is that of negatism. Is this sufficient to gain promotion? One thing for certain, a defensive Palace in the prem will sell more tickets than in the championship. That may swing it.

Alert a moderator to this post

EastEndPalace WithHardNutsCosImAHardBastard 16 Mar 14 1.23pm
A more important stat. Pulis 20 points Millen 4 Points Holloway 3 Points
Alert a moderator to this post

EastEndPalace

WithHardNutsCosImAHardBastard 16 Mar 14 1.23pm

A more important stat.

Pulis 20 points

Millen 4 Points

Holloway 3 Points

Alert a moderator to this post

Andy_G Wimbledon 16 Mar 14 1.55pm
Quote cpj at 16 Mar 2014 11.47am More stats I've just worked out: Under Holloway: Average shots on target (for): 2.5 Average shots on target against): 5 Average goals scored (for): 0.75 Average goals conceded: 2.25 Under Millen: Average shots on target (for): 3 Average shots on target against): 3 Average goals scored (for): 0.25 Average goals conceded: 1 Under Pulis: Average shots on target (for): 4 Average shots on target against): 4.5 Average goals scored (for): 0.7 Average goals conceded: 1 So Pulis' stats are better than Holloway even though it's dull as hell I guess it's worth it The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years
Alert a moderator to this post

Andy_G

Wimbledon 16 Mar 14 1.55pm

Quote cpj at 16 Mar 2014 11.47am

More stats I've just worked out:

Under Holloway:

Average shots on target (for): 2.5
Average shots on target against): 5
Average goals scored (for): 0.75
Average goals conceded: 2.25

Under Millen:

Average shots on target (for): 3
Average shots on target against): 3
Average goals scored (for): 0.25
Average goals conceded: 1

Under Pulis:

Average shots on target (for): 4
Average shots on target against): 4.5
Average goals scored (for): 0.7
Average goals conceded: 1

So Pulis' stats are better than Holloway even though it's dull as hell I guess it's worth it

The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years

Alert a moderator to this post

lil j-eagle little bookham 16 Mar 14 2.25pm
Quote cpj at 16 Mar 2014 11.38am Under Holloway, average possession was 44% including the only game where we have had 50% (Stoke away). Under Millen (including Hull as Pulis was only appointed that day) it was 41%. Under Pulis it is 35%. surely the one thing that shows is that possession isn't important as we've collected more points per game under pulis, then millen, then holloway. The complete opposite to the possession stats. Messi, you're good, but you can't hit a ball like ambrose
Alert a moderator to this post

lil j-eagle

little bookham 16 Mar 14 2.25pm

Quote cpj at 16 Mar 2014 11.38am

Under Holloway, average possession was 44% including the only game where we have had 50% (Stoke away).

Under Millen (including Hull as Pulis was only appointed that day) it was 41%.

Under Pulis it is 35%.

surely the one thing that shows is that possession isn't important as we've collected more points per game under pulis, then millen, then holloway. The complete opposite to the possession stats.

Messi, you're good, but you can't hit a ball like ambrose

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Pulis # = 30% possesion + 0 GF + great GK

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors