You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Micah Richards (gone to Villa)
April 23 2024 10.35pm

Micah Richards (gone to Villa)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

 

View TeenAgeEagle's Profile TeenAgeEagle Flag Luton 15 Apr 14 9.40am Send a Private Message to TeenAgeEagle Add TeenAgeEagle as a friend

Rumoured to want to leave City this season, a good, young defender who can play CB/RB , would definitely be good competition for our current defenders, could even see him at RB and Joel Ward at LB. Wages may be a problem but a loan or even a permanent would be a good deal for us IMO

 


Crystal Palace-dominating without the ball since 2011

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Crazy_Eagle's Profile Crazy_Eagle Flag South London 15 Apr 14 10.07am Send a Private Message to Crazy_Eagle Add Crazy_Eagle as a friend

I don't think that area of the pitch is the problem, and yes, wages would be a big problem.

 


R.I.P. DJ Hardline

CPFC2010

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View comeonyoueagles20's Profile comeonyoueagles20 Flag caterham 15 Apr 14 3.38pm Send a Private Message to comeonyoueagles20 Add comeonyoueagles20 as a friend

I would prefer Zabaleta or Dani Alves if we are going to suggest unrealistic players we couldn't afford or that would be interested in coming. Richards will got for somewhere between 6 and 10 million I would of thought and he is apparently on 80 grand a week , our highest earner is on 30.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View comeonyoueagles20's Profile comeonyoueagles20 Flag caterham 15 Apr 14 3.39pm Send a Private Message to comeonyoueagles20 Add comeonyoueagles20 as a friend

Quote comeonyoueagles20 at 15 Apr 2014 3.38pm

I would prefer Zabaleta or Dani Alves if we are going to suggest unrealistic players we couldn't afford or that would be interested in coming. Richards will go for somewhere between 6 and 10 million I would of thought and he is apparently on 80 grand a week , our highest earner is on 30.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jamesrichards8's Profile Jamesrichards8 Flag 20 Jun 14 10.24pm Send a Private Message to Jamesrichards8 Add Jamesrichards8 as a friend

I keep thinking about Richards, and remembering all the potential he had. He has realized none of it. Pulis is definitely the man to get the best out of him. And for the idiots saying it is unrealistic, he can't get a game at city, made 2 appearances last season, with limited injuries, and has one year left on his contract. Wages wouldn't be a problem because no club would pay them considering his track record of limited success and game time. WBA just signed Lescott who is much more experienced and OK he's older, but not ancient and definitely had more success. We should do it.

Edited by Jamesrichards8 (20 Jun 2014 10.24pm)

 


When you’re knocked on your back and your life’s a flop...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View gbox82's Profile gbox82 Flag Meols, Wirral 20 Jun 14 10.26pm Send a Private Message to gbox82 Add gbox82 as a friend

I would take him in a heartbeat, but I don't think it will happen for the same reason as previous posters - wages.

Can't see him taking the pay cut he would need to come to Palace.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Black Eagle's Profile Black Eagle Flag Swindon 20 Jun 14 10.58pm Send a Private Message to Black Eagle Add Black Eagle as a friend

Quote Jamesrichards8 at 20 Jun 2014 10.24pm

I keep thinking about Richards, and remembering all the potential he had. He has realized none of it. Pulis is definitely the man to get the best out of him. And for the idiots saying it is unrealistic, he can't get a game at city, made 2 appearances last season, with limited injuries, and has one year left on his contract. Wages wouldn't be a problem because no club would pay them considering his track record of limited success and game time. WBA just signed Lescott who is much more experienced and OK he's older, but not ancient and definitely had more success. We should do it.

Edited by Jamesrichards8 (20 Jun 2014 10.24pm)

THIS^^^^^

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View GorBlimey's Profile GorBlimey Flag Surrey 21 Jun 14 2.32am Send a Private Message to GorBlimey Add GorBlimey as a friend

Quote gbox82 at 20 Jun 2014 10.26pm

I would take him in a heartbeat, but I don't think it will happen for the same reason as previous posters - wages.

Can't see him taking the pay cut he would need to come to Palace.


But if City subsidise the wages and it's on a loan with option to sign for agreed fee, what's not to like?

If it works out, we sign him and pay the fee and wages - but we'll have another £70 mil in the bank. If it doesn't, we part ways.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View WelshEagle's Profile WelshEagle Flag London 21 Jun 14 6.24am Send a Private Message to WelshEagle Add WelshEagle as a friend

Richards is an incredible player. God knows why he's not a regular for England. No chance in hell of us signing him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View comeonyoueagles20's Profile comeonyoueagles20 Flag caterham 21 Jun 14 9.02am Send a Private Message to comeonyoueagles20 Add comeonyoueagles20 as a friend

Quote Jamesrichards8 at 20 Jun 2014 10.24pm

I keep thinking about Richards, and remembering all the potential he had. He has realized none of it. Pulis is definitely the man to get the best out of him. And for the idiots saying it is unrealistic, he can't get a game at city, made 2 appearances last season, with limited injuries, and has one year left on his contract. Wages wouldn't be a problem because no club would pay them considering his track record of limited success and game time. WBA just signed Lescott who is much more experienced and OK he's older, but not ancient and definitely had more success. We should do it.

Edited by Jamesrichards8 (20 Jun 2014 10.24pm)


It is completely unrealistic , I would love him but it's never gonna happen , the only reason he hasn't been as successful or played much is just to the fact zabaleta is superb, as for being an idiot , he has been linked with arsenal and Liverpool ,so I'm afraid If you think we have a chance your an idiot..

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 21 Jun 14 10.06am

Depends on wages. Another talent wasted by Man City. That said, he's probably financial set after his time at city, so he might be willing to take a big drop for playing time in the premiership.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View gbox82's Profile gbox82 Flag Meols, Wirral 21 Jun 14 12.22pm Send a Private Message to gbox82 Add gbox82 as a friend

Quote GorBlimey at 21 Jun 2014 2.32am

Quote gbox82 at 20 Jun 2014 10.26pm

I would take him in a heartbeat, but I don't think it will happen for the same reason as previous posters - wages.

Can't see him taking the pay cut he would need to come to Palace.


But if City subsidise the wages and it's on a loan with option to sign for agreed fee, what's not to like?

If it works out, we sign him and pay the fee and wages - but we'll have another £70 mil in the bank. If it doesn't, we part ways.

Good point - could be an even better version of the Chamakh deal!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Micah Richards (gone to Villa)