Gerry Adams meets Prince Charles....

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

jamiemartin721 Reading 20 May 15 4.09pm
Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 10.39am Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.11am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 9.40am Quote derben at 20 May 2015 7.48am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 7.30am Great from both sides. How could it not be? The people of NI deserve a chance at proper peace (and an end to dissident republicanism and loyalist criminality). Just the loyalists are 'criminal' then? "Criminal" as in the loyalist "cause" now is basically thuggery. DRs still pose a threat to peace through terrorism. But the nice IRA are not thugs? Eh??? What??? Hilarious comment, utterly hilarious!! Is that what i said!! Buffoonary!!! Read a newspaper every now and again Sir! Ill explain it to you nice and simply. Loyalist groups, in the main, are no longer engaged in terrorism... they are largely driven by self-interest, maintaining control of their communities through fear, extortion and drugs. Crime and thuggery. They use the peace process as a vehicle to make money. Dissident Republicans are still engaged in terrorism and the planning of terrorist attacks. Do they enagage in criminal activity... of course. Are they nice people? Not in my eyes. Do they represent the biggest threat to the peace process? Probably. Indeed, the UVF and LVF have largely been involved in terrorism largely directed within and against the loyalist community. The UDA haven't been much better. Turns out, the loyalist terror group and the provos are s**ts. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 20 May 15 4.09pm

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 10.39am

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.11am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 9.40am

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 7.48am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 7.30am

Great from both sides.

How could it not be?

The people of NI deserve a chance at proper peace (and an end to dissident republicanism and loyalist criminality).

Just the loyalists are 'criminal' then?

"Criminal" as in the loyalist "cause" now is basically thuggery.

DRs still pose a threat to peace through terrorism.

But the nice IRA are not thugs?

Eh??? What??? Hilarious comment, utterly hilarious!! Is that what i said!! Buffoonary!!! Read a newspaper every now and again Sir!

Ill explain it to you nice and simply.

Loyalist groups, in the main, are no longer engaged in terrorism... they are largely driven by self-interest, maintaining control of their communities through fear, extortion and drugs. Crime and thuggery. They use the peace process as a vehicle to make money.

Dissident Republicans are still engaged in terrorism and the planning of terrorist attacks. Do they enagage in criminal activity... of course. Are they nice people? Not in my eyes. Do they represent the biggest threat to the peace process? Probably.

Indeed, the UVF and LVF have largely been involved in terrorism largely directed within and against the loyalist community.

The UDA haven't been much better.

Turns out, the loyalist terror group and the provos are s**ts.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 20 May 15 4.18pm
Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.43am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 10.39am Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.11am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 9.40am Quote derben at 20 May 2015 7.48am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 7.30am Great from both sides. How could it not be? The people of NI deserve a chance at proper peace (and an end to dissident republicanism and loyalist criminality). Just the loyalists are 'criminal' then? "Criminal" as in the loyalist "cause" now is basically thuggery. DRs still pose a threat to peace through terrorism. But the nice IRA are not thugs? Eh??? What??? Hilarious comment, utterly hilarious!! Is that what i said!! Buffoonary!!! Read a newspaper every now and again Sir! Ill explain it to you nice and simply. Loyalist groups, in the main, are no longer engaged in terrorism... they are largely driven by self-interest, maintaining control of their communities through fear, extortion and drugs. Crime and thuggery. They use the peace process as a vehicle to make money. Dissident Republicans are still engaged in terrorism and the planning of terrorist attacks. Do they enagage in criminal activity... of course. Are they nice people? Not in my eyes. Do they represent the biggest threat to the peace process? Probably. Good, we agree then. Perhaps you might consider applying the use of adjectives like 'criminal' and 'thugs' to both sides when discussing them. The left has always kind of implied that the Loyalists criminals and thugs were somehow worse than the Republican criminals and thugs. The UFF certainly wasn't too fussy about murdering people, only 4% of their victims were actually members of republican paramilitary groups. Its hard to look even remotely legitimate when you've murdered 209 people for being catholic, and 37 people for being loyalist dissenters. I wouldnt' say anyone comes off looking good out of the Troubles, not the British, not the Loyalists or the Republican paramilitary groups and certainly not the 'Community Action groups' of either side. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 20 May 15 4.18pm

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.43am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 10.39am

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.11am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 9.40am

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 7.48am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 7.30am

Great from both sides.

How could it not be?

The people of NI deserve a chance at proper peace (and an end to dissident republicanism and loyalist criminality).

Just the loyalists are 'criminal' then?

"Criminal" as in the loyalist "cause" now is basically thuggery.

DRs still pose a threat to peace through terrorism.

But the nice IRA are not thugs?

Eh??? What??? Hilarious comment, utterly hilarious!! Is that what i said!! Buffoonary!!! Read a newspaper every now and again Sir!

Ill explain it to you nice and simply.

Good, we agree then. Perhaps you might consider applying the use of adjectives like 'criminal' and 'thugs' to both sides when discussing them. The left has always kind of implied that the Loyalists criminals and thugs were somehow worse than the Republican criminals and thugs.

The UFF certainly wasn't too fussy about murdering people, only 4% of their victims were actually members of republican paramilitary groups. Its hard to look even remotely legitimate when you've murdered 209 people for being catholic, and 37 people for being loyalist dissenters.

I wouldnt' say anyone comes off looking good out of the Troubles, not the British, not the Loyalists or the Republican paramilitary groups and certainly not the 'Community Action groups' of either side.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

corkery Cork City 20 May 15 9.59pm
Everyone was murdering innocent people during the troubles, the IRA, the UVF, the army, the police. Collusion was committed by the Irish police and some politicians too. Everyone was at it. Thankfully it's over. Gerry Adams is only doing this for the Irish 2016 election, he has to prove to the Irish public that he can be statesman like. We'll never die
Alert a moderator to this post

corkery

Cork City 20 May 15 9.59pm

Everyone was murdering innocent people during the troubles, the IRA, the UVF, the army, the police. Collusion was committed by the Irish police and some politicians too. Everyone was at it. Thankfully it's over.

Gerry Adams is only doing this for the Irish 2016 election, he has to prove to the Irish public that he can be statesman like.

We'll never die

Alert a moderator to this post

derben 20 May 15 10.05pm
Quote corkery at 20 May 2015 9.59pm Everyone was murdering innocent people during the troubles, the IRA, the UVF, the army, the police. Collusion was committed by the Irish police and some politicians too. Everyone was at it. Thankfully it's over. Gerry Adams is only doing this for the Irish 2016 election, he has to prove to the Irish public that he can be statesman like. LOL
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

20 May 15 10.05pm

Quote corkery at 20 May 2015 9.59pm

Gerry Adams is only doing this for the Irish 2016 election, he has to prove to the Irish public that he can be statesman like.

LOL

Alert a moderator to this post

NoglenCPFC Croydon 20 May 15 10.54pm
Quote Kermit8 at 20 May 2015 11.58am Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.43am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 10.39am Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.11am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 9.40am Quote derben at 20 May 2015 7.48am Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 7.30am Great from both sides. How could it not be? The people of NI deserve a chance at proper peace (and an end to dissident republicanism and loyalist criminality). Just the loyalists are 'criminal' then? "Criminal" as in the loyalist "cause" now is basically thuggery. DRs still pose a threat to peace through terrorism. But the nice IRA are not thugs? Eh??? What??? Hilarious comment, utterly hilarious!! Is that what i said!! Buffoonary!!! Read a newspaper every now and again Sir! Ill explain it to you nice and simply. Loyalist groups, in the main, are no longer engaged in terrorism... they are largely driven by self-interest, maintaining control of their communities through fear, extortion and drugs. Crime and thuggery. They use the peace process as a vehicle to make money. Dissident Republicans are still engaged in terrorism and the planning of terrorist attacks. Do they enagage in criminal activity... of course. Are they nice people? Not in my eyes. Do they represent the biggest threat to the peace process? Probably. Good, we agree then. Perhaps you might consider applying the use of adjectives like 'criminal' and 'thugs' to both sides when discussing them. The left has always kind of implied that the Loyalists criminals and thugs were somehow worse than the Republican criminals and thugs. They were far worse just before and at the beginning of the troubles - Attacking the civil rights movement, Bombay Street, etc - but it evened itself out over time via the IRA. The Paras also indulged with The Springhill Massacre and Bloody Sunday and one or two other incidents as did, obviously, the INLA, UDA, UFF, Shankill Butchers. No innocent parties in this conflict and those who think one side is more heroic than the other are just sentimental fools. What isn't in doubt by is that thuggery and criminality aside - the IRA were an incredibly tough, intelligent and highly capable group of terrorists as has been recognised by those who had to take them on. Nothing to be proud of but they were, unfortunately, effective. Heard one of their bombs go off in East Dulwich. Stays with me to this day the sound of it. Are You for real? A leading UVF man Billy Wright had them running down south like a bunch of cowards!! you sir seem to be biggin them up!? they were s***E there attempts at taking out john major was a shambles! and lot of ex uvf men were ex army soldiers, so I think they were more intelligent than the ra! you seem to be a man of Scottish republicanism background. Don Rogers Tache
Alert a moderator to this post

NoglenCPFC

Croydon 20 May 15 10.54pm

Quote Kermit8 at 20 May 2015 11.58am

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.43am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 10.39am

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 10.11am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 9.40am

Quote derben at 20 May 2015 7.48am

Quote Lombardos barber at 20 May 2015 7.30am

Great from both sides.

How could it not be?

The people of NI deserve a chance at proper peace (and an end to dissident republicanism and loyalist criminality).

Just the loyalists are 'criminal' then?

"Criminal" as in the loyalist "cause" now is basically thuggery.

DRs still pose a threat to peace through terrorism.

But the nice IRA are not thugs?

Eh??? What??? Hilarious comment, utterly hilarious!! Is that what i said!! Buffoonary!!! Read a newspaper every now and again Sir!

Ill explain it to you nice and simply.

Good, we agree then. Perhaps you might consider applying the use of adjectives like 'criminal' and 'thugs' to both sides when discussing them. The left has always kind of implied that the Loyalists criminals and thugs were somehow worse than the Republican criminals and thugs.

They were far worse just before and at the beginning of the troubles - Attacking the civil rights movement, Bombay Street, etc - but it evened itself out over time via the IRA. The Paras also indulged with The Springhill Massacre and Bloody Sunday and one or two other incidents as did, obviously, the INLA, UDA, UFF, Shankill Butchers. No innocent parties in this conflict and those who think one side is more heroic than the other are just sentimental fools.

What isn't in doubt by is that thuggery and criminality aside - the IRA were an incredibly tough, intelligent and highly capable group of terrorists as has been recognised by those who had to take them on.

Nothing to be proud of but they were, unfortunately, effective.

Heard one of their bombs go off in East Dulwich. Stays with me to this day the sound of it.

Are You for real? A leading UVF man Billy Wright had them running down south like a bunch of cowards!! you sir seem to be biggin them up!? they were s***E there attempts at taking out john major was a shambles! and lot of ex uvf men were ex army soldiers, so I think they were more intelligent than the ra! you seem to be a man of Scottish republicanism background.

Don Rogers Tache

Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 21 May 15 11.48am
Quote corkery at 20 May 2015 9.59pm Everyone was murdering innocent people during the troubles, the IRA, the UVF, the army, the police. Collusion was committed by the Irish police and some politicians too. Everyone was at it. Thankfully it's over. Gerry Adams is only doing this for the Irish 2016 election, he has to prove to the Irish public that he can be statesman like. The man is c*, always has been, always will be. The fact that Charles had to shake hands and smile at a man who in all probability had a hand in killing his uncle is a f*ing Joke. Adams should have been dispatched with a long time ago. "It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"
Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh

wherever I lay my hat....... 21 May 15 11.48am

Quote corkery at 20 May 2015 9.59pm

Gerry Adams is only doing this for the Irish 2016 election, he has to prove to the Irish public that he can be statesman like.

The man is c***, always has been, always will be. The fact that Charles had to shake hands and smile at a man who in all probability had a hand in killing his uncle is a f***ing Joke.

Adams should have been dispatched with a long time ago.

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 21 May 15 1.13pm
Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 21 May 15 1.13pm

Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

derben 21 May 15 1.20pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin. Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles.
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

21 May 15 1.20pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm

Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin.

Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles.

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 21 May 15 2.39pm
Quote derben at 21 May 2015 1.20pm Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin. Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles. Good call, he is indeed uncle to Prince Phillip, and so also the Great Uncle of Charles, as well as his wifes second cousin once removed. Small world these royals move in. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 21 May 15 2.39pm

Quote derben at 21 May 2015 1.20pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm

Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin.

Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles.

Good call, he is indeed uncle to Prince Phillip, and so also the Great Uncle of Charles, as well as his wifes second cousin once removed. Small world these royals move in.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Seth On a pale blue dot 21 May 15 3.52pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 2.39pm Quote derben at 21 May 2015 1.20pm Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin. Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles. Good call, he is indeed uncle to Prince Phillip, and so also the Great Uncle of Charles, as well as his wifes second cousin once removed. Small world these royals move in. You mean inbred? "You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16
Alert a moderator to this post

Seth

On a pale blue dot 21 May 15 3.52pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 2.39pm

Quote derben at 21 May 2015 1.20pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm

Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin.

Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles.

Good call, he is indeed uncle to Prince Phillip, and so also the Great Uncle of Charles, as well as his wifes second cousin once removed. Small world these royals move in.

You mean inbred?

"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 21 May 15 3.57pm
Quote Seth at 21 May 2015 3.52pm Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 2.39pm Quote derben at 21 May 2015 1.20pm Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin. Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles. Good call, he is indeed uncle to Prince Phillip, and so also the Great Uncle of Charles, as well as his wifes second cousin once removed. Small world these royals move in. You mean inbred? Pretty much, I was being polite, incase the queen reads the HoL "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 21 May 15 3.57pm

Quote Seth at 21 May 2015 3.52pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 2.39pm

Quote derben at 21 May 2015 1.20pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 May 2015 1.13pm

Not actually his uncle, Mountbatten was Queen Elizabeth's second cousin.

Wasn't Mountbatten Prince Philip's uncle, that would make him the great-uncle of Charles.

Good call, he is indeed uncle to Prince Phillip, and so also the Great Uncle of Charles, as well as his wifes second cousin once removed. Small world these royals move in.

You mean inbred?

Pretty much, I was being polite, incase the queen reads the HoL

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 21 May 15 3.58pm
In bred or not if I was in Charles position I'd have went to shake his hand, then given him two fingers and butted the lying pr1ck. hateful human being I don't think that about anyone else on this planet, but this guy is a pure terrorist who decided to hang up his semtex, becuase the British Forces where close to bringing the f*inglot of em down, so he decides to come to the negotiating table, and that f*in idiot Major let him. "It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"
Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh

wherever I lay my hat....... 21 May 15 3.58pm

In bred or not if I was in Charles position I'd have went to shake his hand, then given him two fingers and butted the lying pr1ck.

hateful human being I don't think that about anyone else on this planet, but this guy is a pure terrorist who decided to hang up his semtex, becuase the British Forces where close to bringing the f***inglot of em down, so he decides to come to the negotiating table, and that f***in idiot Major let him.

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Gerry Adams meets Prince Charles....

Site Map

Sponsors