You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Stadium Redevelopment
September 23 2020 8.41am

Stadium Redevelopment

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 204 of 209 < 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 >

This forum is sponsored by

Football Index

Sponsor a forum or Advertise on the HOL!

 

View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 01 Apr 20 6.07pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'new stand gets clearance - official' by bexleydave

Might actually get the go ahead from mayor khant in the future
Palace and parish have offered the stadium and all facilities to him for this corona virus.
Rewards could be forthcoming I feel.
Sneaky move but worth a punt.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View palace99's Profile palace99 Flag 19 Apr 20 3.26pm Send a Private Message to palace99 Add palace99 as a friend

Originally posted by jeeagles

Largers supermarkets are generally struggling across the country as shopping trends have changed.

not at the moment they're not!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 19 Apr 20 6.19pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by palace99

not at the moment they're not!

You have more chance getting a vaccine for this virus before a single brick is laid on the new stand.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dorking's Profile dorking Flag 19 Apr 20 7.37pm Send a Private Message to dorking Add dorking as a friend

Croydon Council have kickstarted another round of negotiations regarding the adjoining houses in the hope that the £100m scheme might get off the ground (from which they would be a significant beneficiary)

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ex hibitionist's Profile ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 19 Apr 20 9.29pm Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

here's a good article - suggests the hold up is Parrish not signing off a certain section of the agreement (S106) which obliges the club to sort out the property and local transport issues ...

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View grumpymort's Profile grumpymort Flag 19 Apr 20 9.54pm Send a Private Message to grumpymort Add grumpymort as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

here's a good article - suggests the hold up is Parrish not signing off a certain section of the agreement (S106) which obliges the club to sort out the property and local transport issues ...

[Link]


Well you cant do anything with the local transport so that is pointless.

SP doesn't want to pay anything himself he expects everybody else to write the cheques that is the mans problem and why the club is like this.

unless he goes we are never going to see anything improved

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tom-the-eagle's Profile Tom-the-eagle Online Flag Croydon 19 Apr 20 10.34pm Send a Private Message to Tom-the-eagle Add Tom-the-eagle as a friend

Will have to be a huge new stand to hold us if we all have to sit two meters apart

 


"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 20 Apr 20 7.09am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

The Council do seem to be taking the p over this. Bus Shelters in Whitehorse Lane! better cycle routes! Sounds like these are issues they should have sorted and paid for. Still, they appear to have the club over a barrel so why not? By the way I donít agree with their approach.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View orpingtoneagle's Profile orpingtoneagle Flag Orpington 20 Apr 20 12.05pm Send a Private Message to orpingtoneagle Add orpingtoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

The Council do seem to be taking the p over this. Bus Shelters in Whitehorse Lane! better cycle routes! Sounds like these are issues they should have sorted and paid for. Still, they appear to have the club over a barrel so why not? By the way I donít agree with their approach.

So this is the councils fault? No it's another example of the elephant in the room... We have no money and this white elephant will never be built. Another chairman who will fail to deliver on big promises

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 20 Apr 20 12.17pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by orpingtoneagle

So this is the councils fault? No it's another example of the elephant in the room... We have no money and this white elephant will never be built. Another chairman who will fail to deliver on big promises

Not saying it is all their fault but they certainly arenít helping the club

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View JRW2's Profile JRW2 Flag Dulwich 20 Apr 20 12.19pm Send a Private Message to JRW2 Add JRW2 as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

The Council do seem to be taking the p over this. Bus Shelters in Whitehorse Lane! better cycle routes! Sounds like these are issues they should have sorted and paid for. Still, they appear to have the club over a barrel so why not? By the way I donít agree with their approach.


You're absolutely right. I've only just read that list of Council requirements in the S106 agreement, and I'm fuming. No supporter needs to cross the road outside Selhurst station, so why are so-called pedestrian improvements needed? Why does a bigger stadium mean bus shelters are needed? Why should we have to pay £25k for management plans in connection with the local stations and "regeneration of the wider area"? I can only think that they have a list of nebulous "extras" that they routinely attach to any planning decision.

Years ago one of my knees was so painful that I saw a private consultant and had a steroid injection. When I received my bill, there was the consultation fee, the fee for the procedure, and a mysterious item of £500 for what was called "Treatment". I paid for the first two items and wrote to ask for clarification of the "Treatment". They never replied and it was never paid.

But there's a difference between dealing with the private sector and the public. Councils can wield arbitrary power, and in this case, as you say, they have us over a barrel.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View orpingtoneagle's Profile orpingtoneagle Flag Orpington 20 Apr 20 12.47pm Send a Private Message to orpingtoneagle Add orpingtoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2


You're absolutely right. I've only just read that list of Council requirements in the S106 agreement, and I'm fuming. No supporter needs to cross the road outside Selhurst station, so why are so-called pedestrian improvements needed? Why does a bigger stadium mean bus shelters are needed? Why should we have to pay £25k for management plans in connection with the local stations and "regeneration of the wider area"? I can only think that they have a list of nebulous "extras" that they routinely attach to any planning decision.

Years ago one of my knees was so painful that I saw a private consultant and had a steroid injection. When I received my bill, there was the consultation fee, the fee for the procedure, and a mysterious item of £500 for what was called "Treatment". I paid for the first two items and wrote to ask for clarification of the "Treatment". They never replied and it was never paid.

But there's a difference between dealing with the private sector and the public. Councils can wield arbitrary power, and in this case, as you say, they have us over a barrel.

Any planning permission comes with strings attached.

We are building (or not) a new strand to both increase the match day capacity and to generate revenue on a non match day. That brings a benefit to the club it will also generate more people using the local area and that puts a strain on it. It is therefore only reasonable that the club who will cause this increase chips in.

It is not a public/private thing, it is a cost of doing business. If you build a housing estate would you expect the council to stump up the cost of a new road and street furniture? They are not selling the houses and getting the profit.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 204 of 209 < 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Stadium Redevelopment