No security for Labour conference
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Stuk  Top half 18 Aug 16 1.54pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
As they have decided to boycott G4S, who they normally use, for something they've apparently done in Israel (but they're not anti-semitic of course) and then the company they awarded it to is refusing to be forced into signing a union agreement. Can they organise anything at the moment? Not to mention wanting to open talks with IS ffs.
Optimistic as ever |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 18 Aug 16 2.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
As they have decided to boycott G4S, who they normally use, for something they've apparently done in Israel (but they're not anti-semitic of course) and then the company they awarded it to is refusing to be forced into signing a union agreement. Can they organise anything at the moment? Not to mention wanting to open talks with IS ffs.
Why shouldn't people who work for security companies have agreed rights? Labour weren't asking Showsec to get staff to join a union but to agree to minimum terms and conditions for the workforce.
Edited by nickgusset (18 Aug 2016 2.12pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Jacey 18 Aug 16 2.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
No security necessary for a near empty hall!!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 18 Aug 16 2.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
As they have decided to boycott G4S, who they normally use, for something they've apparently done in Israel (but they're not anti-semitic of course) and then the company they awarded it to is refusing to be forced into signing a union agreement. Can they organise anything at the moment? Not to mention wanting to open talks with IS ffs. This would be the same G4S that bungled the security at the London Olympics. Perhaps Labour want to be confident that their security would actually turn up
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 18 Aug 16 2.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jacey
No security necessary for a near empty hall!! Why empty given membership has increased around 100,000 and are by far the largest political party (around half a million members)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 18 Aug 16 2.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Why shouldn't people who work for security companies have agreed rights? Labour weren't asking Showsec to get staff to join a union but to agree to minimum terms and conditions for the workforce.
Edited by nickgusset (18 Aug 2016 2.12pm) I said they're not anti-semitic didn't I? Why should a company have to change it's policies to be awarded a contract it tendered for? The GMB wanted them to sign a union agreement when no such request was made pre-tender. It's anti-competitive. I couldn't give a f*** but i'm pretty sure the other crackpot has said similar before too.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
They've got some vague claims about a link between G4S and Israeli prisons. Hardly concrete reasoning.| Stuk Top half 18 Aug 16 2.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Sedlescombe
This would be the same G4S that bungled the security at the London Olympics. Perhaps Labour want to be confident that their security would actually turn up They've happily used them since 2012 so I doubt that's it. They want to be sure that some security turns up, or there'll be no conference at all.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 18 Aug 16 2.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Sedlescombe
Why empty given membership has increased around 100,000 and are by far the largest political party (around half a million members) Given the huge split in the party all the more need for the security. It'll be a placard central.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 18 Aug 16 2.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
As they have decided to boycott G4S, who they normally use, for something they've apparently done in Israel (but they're not anti-semitic of course) and then the company they awarded it to is refusing to be forced into signing a union agreement. Can they organise anything at the moment? Not to mention wanting to open talks with IS ffs. With no security about they may well pay them a "visit".
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 18 Aug 16 2.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
Given the huge split in the party all the more need for the security. It'll be a placard central. That is certainly true
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Aug 16 3.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
That anyone is still using G4S is a mystery.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 18 Aug 16 9.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
That anyone is still using G4S is a mystery. Price and backhanders - in particular to government ministers and MP's, local Councillors whoever awards contracts really. We like to call it the Irish model.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.