Team for Sunderland
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Dan89  Se25 22 Sep 16 10.26am |
  |
|---|---|
|
If tomkins is unavailable then have to play kelly at CB with Ledley at lB with cabaye coming into midfield. Gk Mandanda Subs Hennessey, fryers, chungy, cabaye, flamini, wickham and campbell
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Griffish Croydon 22 Sep 16 10.42am |
|
|---|---|
|
I don't think anyone would disagree with that team. Campbell and Sako fighting eachother for thaf last place on the subs bench
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| minkus100 22 Sep 16 10.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Griffish
I don't think anyone would disagree with that team. Campbell and Sako fighting eachother for thaf last place on the subs bench haha, we'll see.....
Stay Classy San Diego |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Griffish Croydon 22 Sep 16 10.51am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by minkus100
haha, we'll see..... Famous last words from myself! I think the only change that could make sense is Cabaye starting ahead of Ledley. Based on reviews on here, Cabaye was shocking yesterday, and probably won't be risked to start after playing a full 90 after 3 days earlier on his return from injury. Ledley deserves to start IMO.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 22 Sep 16 10.56am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by minkus100
haha, we'll see..... You must be the only one who thinks the team doesn't pick itself this Saturday at Sunderland. We have an obvious 12 best players and 1 position in question so I'm not sure how you can doubt the OP's team.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| minkus100 22 Sep 16 11.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
You must be the only one who thinks the team doesn't pick itself this Saturday at Sunderland. We have an obvious 12 best players and 1 position in question so I'm not sure how you can doubt the OP's team. I was more making reference to the fact that EVERYTHING on this site develops into an argument. Although if I was being pedantic, if we have "1 position in question", it's pretty easy to disagree with the OP's team... (not that I do... I'm just saying...)
Stay Classy San Diego |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 22 Sep 16 11.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by minkus100
I was more making reference to the fact that EVERYTHING on this site develops into an argument. Although if I was being pedantic, if we have "1 position in question", it's pretty easy to disagree with the OP's team... (not that I do... I'm just saying...) Oh yeah I see. But on that 1 position being if Tomkins isn't available then surely Kelly has to play there leaving a hole at LB to be filled by Ledley meaning Cabaye comes in? The only other alternative is bringing in Flamini and the lead in his boots. And further I'd limit the shuffling around of defenders. By that I mean keeping Ward at RB rather than shifting him over to LB to bring in someone (Flamini) at RB who isn't fit anyway. Edited by Rudi Hedman (22 Sep 2016 11.14am)
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
taylors lovechild  22 Sep 16 11.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
I know this may sound like an odd suggestion, but I was thinking against a team like Sunderland could we play Puncheon at LB. He has a great left foot and can hit long passes (sometimes even accurately). Although he is prone to giving the ball away he can actually tackle. He also often comes deep looking for the ball anyway. I wouldn't risk this against a top 10 team, but against an out-of-form Sunderland? It could work I think. It would certainly be better than playing Fryers again.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| miles18 Telford 22 Sep 16 12.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
If Tomkins is not 100% then I really hope Pardew doesn't put him in the team just because we're short. We would be better off having a s*** defence for one game rather than losing him for longer. Dann is a massive loss tho!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Apart from Defoe I don't think Sunderland are anything special and Moyes is useless. Should at least be getting a point. | CrazyBadger Ware 22 Sep 16 12.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by minkus100
I was more making reference to the fact that EVERYTHING on this site develops into an argument. Although if I was being pedantic, if we have "1 position in question", it's pretty easy to disagree with the OP's team... (not that I do... I'm just saying...) No it doesn't
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| minkus100 22 Sep 16 12.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
No it doesn't
Stay Classy San Diego |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
vflynn  Perth 22 Sep 16 1.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
No it doesn't Oh YES it does
"If you wana get ahead............Get a hat..... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.