You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Connor Wickham injury
October 23 2020 10.34am

Connor Wickham injury

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 26 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

This forum is sponsored by

Football Index

Sponsor a forum or Advertise on the HOL!

 

View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 01 Sep 17 12.21pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Loz83

Im being ironic, he's useless!

Pretty aware of that, mate.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Loz83's Profile Loz83 Flag Crawley 01 Sep 17 12.26pm Send a Private Message to Loz83 Add Loz83 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Pretty aware of that, mate.

Ok, I don't understand 1st your comment then.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View slubglurge's Profile slubglurge Flag welling 02 Sep 17 2.08pm Send a Private Message to slubglurge Add slubglurge as a friend

Wickham is not a quick healer. You can mostly add 50% to his recovery time than most other players. I know this particular injury is serious but i doubt we will see him before the spring if at all. Hes another Remy

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Bangell's Profile Bangell Flag Oxford 02 Sep 17 2.09pm Send a Private Message to Bangell Add Bangell as a friend

He's in the 25 (24) man squad, so I assume there's at least a slight chance he'll be back before the new year.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View BelfastEagle's Profile BelfastEagle Flag 02 Sep 17 2.18pm Send a Private Message to BelfastEagle Add BelfastEagle as a friend

There is no chance he will play this year, but as we don't have 25 players anyway there is nothing to be gained from not naming him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mad4palace's Profile Mad4palace Flag 02 Sep 17 2.21pm Send a Private Message to Mad4palace Add Mad4palace as a friend

Why is he in the squad if he's not going to be back before January? You don't have to name a player in the 25 if he's got a long term injury or so I thought. I can only assume they think he might be back before the turn of the year, otherwise he's taking up a spot where we could have added another goalkeeper.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eagleder1's Profile Eagleder1 Flag 02 Sep 17 2.22pm Send a Private Message to Eagleder1 Add Eagleder1 as a friend

It may have escaped your attention but we are short of at least a striker and a goalkeeper so if he is knackered and can't play this year its senseless to include him and take a place which could be occupied by a one or the other. there again its Palace logic!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View coulsdoneagle's Profile coulsdoneagle Online Flag London 02 Sep 17 2.24pm Send a Private Message to coulsdoneagle Add coulsdoneagle as a friend

You can't not name players and keep spaces for free agents. That's why we named Mutch and Wickham etc.

If you have pros over 21 on the books then you have to name 25 and can only keep spaces for frees if you don't have 25 on the books. That's why it's gutting that Mutch didn't go out on loan. That would have given us another space rather than leaving us with that lazy talentless knob.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Asian Eagle Flag Cebu City 02 Sep 17 2.26pm

That guy is made out of glass, so we better get rid of him asap.
Get in a new Ian Wright that would be something.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Bangell's Profile Bangell Flag Oxford 02 Sep 17 2.33pm Send a Private Message to Bangell Add Bangell as a friend

Originally posted by coulsdoneagle

You can't not name players and keep spaces for free agents. That's why we named Mutch and Wickham etc.

If you have pros over 21 on the books then you have to name 25 and can only keep spaces for frees if you don't have 25 on the books. That's why it's gutting that Mutch didn't go out on loan. That would have given us another space rather than leaving us with that lazy talentless knob.

Hmm, I was unaware of that. Hopefully one more striker on a free will give the squad enough depth to last until January (and let's hope we're already looking for deals to line up ahead of time).

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Pigglelet's Profile Pigglelet Flag Deepest Darkest Sussex 02 Sep 17 2.41pm Send a Private Message to Pigglelet Add Pigglelet as a friend

Originally posted by Bangell

Hmm, I was unaware of that. Hopefully one more striker on a free will give the squad enough depth to last until January (and let's hope we're already looking for deals to line up ahead of time).

Yes, I wouldn't put too reliance on that.

 


"Better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt."
Mark Twain.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 02 Sep 17 2.45pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by coulsdoneagle

You can't not name players and keep spaces for free agents. That's why we named Mutch and Wickham etc.

If you have pros over 21 on the books then you have to name 25 and can only keep spaces for frees if you don't have 25 on the books. That's why it's gutting that Mutch didn't go out on loan. That would have given us another space rather than leaving us with that lazy talentless knob.

Neither was I aware of that. Is that definitely the rule?

Can we loan in a goalkeeper if we're down to one? Or do we have to rely on younger keepers to play premier league football if the last one (of two) gets injured?

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 26 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Connor Wickham injury