You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Frank de Bore
April 18 2024 6.36am

Frank de Bore

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Last >>

 

View Mr Palaceman's Profile Mr Palaceman Flag 16 Mar 18 9.09pm Send a Private Message to Mr Palaceman Add Mr Palaceman as a friend

Get over it...

[Link]

I was excited when he was appointed, I can't lie. I was shocked when he was sacked so soon but now I can't wait until he gets another job. Maybe then he will shut the h£ll up.

BTW, This is not a "told you so" thread, or an excuse for hol'ers to bash others. It's that for me, this guy is showing a distinct lack of class.

I wish we could say that we had dodged a bullet. But he just keeps trying to reload.

He's starting to make Pulis look like a diplomat.

 


"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"

Stan Laurel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chateauferret Flag 16 Mar 18 9.13pm

One of the hallmarks of a true complete and utter bellend is that he can't stop talking about how everything s*** that happens to him is someone else's fault.

He was total toilet. What happens to managers who are total toilet? They get sacked.

 


============
The Ferret
============

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rachid Rachid Rachid's Profile Rachid Rachid Rachid Flag 16 Mar 18 9.16pm Send a Private Message to Rachid Rachid Rachid Add Rachid Rachid Rachid as a friend

Can't stab someone in the back if you've not formed a rapport in the first place.Typical dutch deflection and bulls***.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mwncisee's Profile Mwncisee Flag Middlesbrough 16 Mar 18 9.26pm Send a Private Message to Mwncisee Add Mwncisee as a friend

Recently in my work I have been asked to head a project in which colleagues will have to alter the way they think and go about there work. Have been supported by an external agency in this and it is very much accepted when doing this that your workforce can be split into a quarter who will embrace a new project a quarter who will be avidly against it and the remaining half will be unsure. Good managers don't actually bother trying to persuade the 1/4 who are avidly against. You will never persuade them. But by getting the unsures on board you have 3/4 of your workforce behind you and it is through them tne last 1/4 become engaged. Simple undersranding of basic management and FdB's comments in the article speak more of his dailure to be able to manage even at thus basic level.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View southnorwoodhill's Profile southnorwoodhill Flag 16 Mar 18 9.31pm Send a Private Message to southnorwoodhill Add southnorwoodhill as a friend

He's gone, let him go

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View merganser's Profile merganser Flag 16 Mar 18 11.06pm Send a Private Message to merganser Add merganser as a friend

Would his pay-off have included a confidentiality clause?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View FairweatherEagle's Profile FairweatherEagle Flag London 16 Mar 18 11.17pm Send a Private Message to FairweatherEagle Add FairweatherEagle as a friend

He's right about being naive though, by the time he realised 433 was the best system, it was too late.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 16 Mar 18 11.44pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

He's an arrogant fool. It takes time to do what he wanted unless you have hundreds of millions. He incidentally said every prem club spends lots of money. He came out with all the 'virtual' crap and lies and very soon after made radical changes which would never work so soon. He put us at risk, didn't give a xh1t that we were and from comments made like ''Crystal Palace this year, who knows next year'', the long term project was bullsh1t as well.

Goodbye w@nker. Glad Parish sacked him. Should've been sooner, or better, never hired in the first place.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (17 Mar 2018 12.03am)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View tonymikejoe's Profile tonymikejoe Flag UK 16 Mar 18 11.50pm Send a Private Message to tonymikejoe Add tonymikejoe as a friend

Here is the rest of what Frank had to say about CPFC :


The wholesale reinvention of the squad that De Boer had envisaged did not materialise. Just two new players arrived on permanent deals: his former Ajax charge Jairo Riedewald, and Mamadou Sakho on the last day of the transfer window, by which point De Boer had already decided to knuckle down and focus his attentions on a creaking defence.

“That’s why I played five in the back, 5-4-1, very defensive,” he says. “Not my kind of idea, but necessary with the players that I had at that moment. You can say, why didn't you start with 4-3-3? No. For example, [Wilfried] Zaha is the most important player at the club. You want him at his strength, not always running after his wing-back. And defensively we were very vulnerable, so OK, we’ll put one extra. Because it was Frank De Boer, everybody thought it was 3-4-3 and too offensive, but it wasn’t Frank De Boer at all.”

Palace’s start to the season, though abject, wasn’t always as nightmarish as subsequently portrayed. They came close to getting a point at Anfield, and despite going down 1-0 to Burnley at Turf Moor in De Boer’s last game, there were signs that the team was finally beginning to gel. “We were really dominating Burnley at their ground,” De Boer says. “Scott Dann had a big chance at the end. Unbelievable.”

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 17 Mar 18 12.08am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

It was 3-4-3 to begin with vs Huddersfield.

Did it change to 5-4-1 vs Liverpool really because he had to use Luca properly and Wilf wasn't available? I can't remember now but the intention was 3-4-3.

It's all immaterial now. If he'd just got himself comfortable and moved a few out and in each window and consulted Sammy Lee more he may have done well, if his character would allow him.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 17 Mar 18 12.23am Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Nevertheless I think 4 games is not enough but that's the pressure of the PL for you.

The poll on this site reflected that as well I think by about 10% feeling he should have got longer.

One good result, a decision going your way it can all change so quick.



 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Holmesdale 1989's Profile Holmesdale 1989 Flag 17 Mar 18 12.40am Send a Private Message to Holmesdale 1989 Add Holmesdale 1989 as a friend

A good few players did spit their dummies of of their prams. We're in this mess by certain traitors.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Frank de Bore