You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The hypocrisy of sillicon valley.
December 8 2019 10.53am

The hypocrisy of sillicon valley.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

 

View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Online Flag 10 Oct 19 12.56pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Eustace H. Plimsoll

Have another go Teddy. (And probably very very many more.) You may get the point eventually.

('Kinell, it really isn't that tricky if you follow what's been - perfectly clearly - said.)

Patronising? Thatís a long word isnít it? Well done. You must be a very smart chap. Comparatively. If thatís the word.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eustace H. Plimsoll's Profile Eustace H. Plimsoll Flag Aldershot 10 Oct 19 1.09pm Send a Private Message to Eustace H. Plimsoll Add Eustace H. Plimsoll as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Patronising? Thatís a long word isnít it? Well done. You must be a very smart chap. Comparatively. If thatís the word.


You really ought to check your understanding of a word's meaning before you attempt to brandish it as a weapon. Tends to be less cutting if misused.

No matter though, I've no interest in engaging an online squabble. The point you chose to ignore is that the explanation given is very straight-forward. You'll get if you really try.

 


As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Online Flag 10 Oct 19 1.14pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Eustace H. Plimsoll

You really ought to check your understanding of a word's meaning before you attempt to brandish it as a weapon. Tends to be less cutting if misused.

No matter though, I've no interest in engaging an online squabble. The point you chose to ignore is that the explanation given is very straight-forward. You'll get if you really try.

Right. Meanwhile try Googling white carpet, black carpet and black and white carpet. Apparently the same algorithm doesnít apply.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 10 Oct 19 1.23pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

OK, but thatís not the issue is it? Forget ďblack and whiteĒ and search ďwhiteĒ. No black. Donít enter black. Just white. On its own. Just that.

You really don't get it do you?

Its not what is typed in the search that matters!

It's how the algorithm responds which does.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eustace H. Plimsoll's Profile Eustace H. Plimsoll Flag Aldershot 10 Oct 19 1.25pm Send a Private Message to Eustace H. Plimsoll Add Eustace H. Plimsoll as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Right. Meanwhile try Googling white carpet, black carpet and black and white carpet. Apparently the same algorithm doesnít apply.

An image-search of "white carpet" does bring up black-and-white carpets within its offerings though. Not loads, but enough to support the explanation, I would say. And a sizeable number of other colour-and-white offerings too.

Not the same apparent disparity as with the equivalent 'couples' search, but enough to suggest there is a credible argument against an agenda or conspiracy, I would say.

It's the eyes you see with.

 


As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eustace H. Plimsoll's Profile Eustace H. Plimsoll Flag Aldershot 10 Oct 19 1.29pm Send a Private Message to Eustace H. Plimsoll Add Eustace H. Plimsoll as a friend

Hang on...

Sillicon Valley?? SilLicon?!

Have we been (inadvertantly?) whooshed?

 


As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Online Flag 10 Oct 19 1.35pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

You really don't get it do you?

Its not what is typed in the search that matters!

It's how the algorithm responds which does.

Not as often as Iíd like, no.
See carpets.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Online Flag 10 Oct 19 1.38pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Eustace H. Plimsoll

Hang on...

Sillicon Valley?? SilLicon?!

Have we been (inadvertantly?) whooshed?

The conspiracy deepens. And now Stirlingsays has gone to ground.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View palace_in_frogland's Profile palace_in_frogland Flag In a broken dream 10 Oct 19 1.55pm Send a Private Message to palace_in_frogland Add palace_in_frogland as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

The conspiracy deepens. And now Stirlingsays has gone to ground.

He got fed up with people arguing that black was white...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View SW19 CPFC's Profile SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe 10 Oct 19 1.56pm Send a Private Message to SW19 CPFC Add SW19 CPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Now look at what you get when you put 'White Couple' into a search result using the Google algorithm.

Very simplistic argument, and you almost had me.

Try typing 'white teenager'.

The algorithms are not as perfect as your theory would suggest, to allow for that level of sophisticated rigging without damaging the usability of other search results.

Also note that the sources and articles attached to the images that appear in search also influence the score given to each image. So an article that is authored or features a black person with 'white people' in the title is just as likely to appear depending on popularity and a whole host of other criteria defined by the algorithm, as an image with nothing other than 'white' and 'person'/'people' in the criteria.

Such as this one, which appears in the second line of the 'white people' search, but with a photo of Chris Rock. On the surface, it would seem to validate your argument. But if you just pick once and read the headline, it validates mine. [Link]

In fact, most of the 'black' examples that appear as results link to articles that have 'white poeple' as a core topic or subject, but authored by a black person. This is a classic case of surface level viral nonsense.

Perhaps ironically it demonstrates that black people are creating more content about white people than actual white people. I'll leave it to others to discuss why that is.

Now, if I were to type 'people' in as a search topic, and more black than white people came up, you might have held my attention more. But then again, that could simply be due to more articles or content on 'people' being written by black authors or with black people as the subject.

Which, actually then reflects back a societal 'bias' rather than the algorithm containing bias. Much like AI, which is anything but impartial Ė it is simply reflective of the inputs it is given to process.

 


said the rabid giraffe whilst brandishing his throbbing member of reason, and twas ever thus.

Did you know? 95% of people are morons.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Online Flag 10 Oct 19 2.08pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by palace_in_frogland

Beer or women?

Which is the one that costs all your money and makes you feel bad the next day?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View SpyroCrystal's Profile SpyroCrystal Flag London 10 Oct 19 2.12pm Send a Private Message to SpyroCrystal Add SpyroCrystal as a friend

Silicon Valley is a powerhouse neo marxist tech entity designed to destroy the West and soon the whole world with the new planned world revolution coming soon 21st Century : (

Edited by SpyroCrystal (10 Oct 2019 2.13pm)

 


Big up the Palace!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 4 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The hypocrisy of sillicon valley.