Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
Teddy Eagle 28 Nov 22 12.20pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 28 Nov 22 8.13pm | |
---|---|
Much as it’s a piss take most petrol cars after late 2006 and diesels after late 2016 should be exempt. Doesn’t mean it’s right though the stupid khant.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagle52 Shirley,Croydon 14 Jan 23 10.42am | |
---|---|
There’s an anti ULEZ expansion demo on Saturday January 28 at 12 noon Trafalgar Square.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Jan 23 11.40am | |
---|---|
Apparently Sutton council is refusing to co-operate and wont allow TFL to install cameras, hopefully other boroughs follow suit. Sutton's argument which I think is a fair one is that they have very little public transport in the borough e.g. no tram no tube. Edited by Badger11 (14 Jan 2023 11.41am)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Online Croydon 14 Jan 23 1.19pm | |
---|---|
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 14 Jan 23 1.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all. Have you considered that some people, who require a car for work, may not be able to afford anything other than “an old banger”? Especially, at the present time, when your friends from the Unions are bringing the railways to a near standstill
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 14 Jan 23 1.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all. You certainly meet euro emission standards.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 14 Jan 23 1.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Have you considered that some people, who require a car for work, may not be able to afford anything other than “an old banger”? Especially, at the present time, when your friends from the Unions are bringing the railways to a near standstill It's all those selfish minimum wage earners. Not only do they refuse to work from home or buy a new car but they insist on working before and after everyone else which extends the period in which the planet is being destroyed. They should be fined every day until they have a bit more consideration.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Jan 23 1.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all. When public transport is not good enough what are they supposed to do.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Apollofuzz On the edge of reason 14 Jan 23 1.50pm | |
---|---|
Very good speech on ULEZ Expanding ULEZ is a cash grab to fill Sadiq Khan's coffers. But it's not a tax on wealthy drivers. Over 50% of households in outer London earning as little as £10,000 own a car. ULEZ is a tax on ordinary working people who can't afford a new car or Khan's daily £12.50 charge.
I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Online Croydon 14 Jan 23 1.55pm | |
---|---|
It will undoubtedly be extremely unpopular. I prefer horse and carriage myself, environmentally friendly and good for the garden.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
stevethenorm Hornchurch 14 Jan 23 1.58pm | |
---|---|
The words ignorant tawt and konb spring to mind Originally posted by steeleye20
ULEZ is totally justified and hasn't gone far enough. Drivers must pay the Ulez charge if their vehicle does not meet required Euro emissions standards for their model and make. What is the problem with that. Really the question to me is, why are polluting vehicles allowed on our roads, at all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.