You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Kyle Walker-Peters (Rumour)
February 24 2020 8.57pm

Kyle Walker-Peters (Rumour)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 5 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

This forum is sponsored by

Football Index

Sponsor a forum or Advertise on the HOL!

 

View Casual's Profile Casual Flag Orpington 09 Jan 20 6.34am Send a Private Message to Casual Add Casual as a friend

Originally posted by mattteo

Yeah, well, he was 20 years old, not 22. He was ours, so we didn't pay for him and actually made quite a good profit.

If we pay 15 million for a 22 (soon to be 23 year old), how much do you think we're gonna sell him for in 3-4 years (when he'll be 26-27)? I can safely say it won't be for more than 20 million. Cause you only get an abnormally large sum for a player who is very young- like AWB was. It could be for nothing too, so they would be 15 million down the drain.

Not interested in his re sale value. If he comes to us and is like MacArthur has been, first team regular for a good few years that rarely lets us down, would be good business.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Ginger Pubic Wig's Profile Ginger Pubic Wig Online Flag Wickham de L'Ouest 09 Jan 20 6.51am Send a Private Message to Ginger Pubic Wig Add Ginger Pubic Wig as a friend

I do want KWP because we desperately need a right back. But Triple T makes good points for why 15m is way too much when Bogle is allegedly available much cheaper.

Players with great stats in the championship do deliver in the prem.

No Spurs fans on their forums seem to think 15m is a sane price.

A Spurs fan at work thinks the move would be all-round good. But the truth is, even Spurs fans probably don't know if he's got what it takes.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View fish mitten's Profile fish mitten Online Flag Chelmsford 09 Jan 20 7.24am Send a Private Message to fish mitten Add fish mitten as a friend

I suspect the 15 million is the usual x million plus additional for appearances. Have a couple of friends who are Spurs fans and rate him quite highly. Still young enough to vastly improve.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View aashman12's Profile aashman12 Flag 09 Jan 20 7.54am Send a Private Message to aashman12 Add aashman12 as a friend

Originally posted by mattteo

Yeah, well, he was 20 years old, not 22. He was ours, so we didn't pay for him and actually made quite a good profit.

If we pay 15 million for a 22 (soon to be 23 year old), how much do you think we're gonna sell him for in 3-4 years (when he'll be 26-27)? I can safely say it won't be for more than 20 million. Cause you only get an abnormally large sum for a player who is very young- like AWB was. It could be for nothing too, so they would be 15 million down the drain.

What waffle, how old is harry Maguire? 26 is prime for a footballer, max value.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nobbybm's Profile Nobbybm Flag Dartford 09 Jan 20 8.38am Send a Private Message to Nobbybm Add Nobbybm as a friend

Originally posted by mattteo


Well, if the bosses saw this and went like "Hey, let's buy this guy!! He's amazing at 23! Had 3 assists in the Bournemouth game, 5 in 12 matches in the PL. Surely worth 15 million." then I have to say that they're getting really ripped off.

There are no assists! Look at the Tottenham- Bournemouth higlights: [Link]

He didn't even play. He has 400 minutes the entire season and has missed Tottenham's last 10 matches due to not making the squad.


Edited by mattteo (09 Jan 2020 2.34am)

Roy wants full backs who can defend - I'm fairly sure 'assists' are way down his requirement list for a defender. Royball is built on a solid defensive platform.

It's the same as the AWB v TAA argument in that one is a much better defender whereas the other is much better going forward. If you could combine the two you'd have the best full back/wing back on the planet.

 


Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Sutton Coldfield 09 Jan 20 9.51am Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

There's been a lot of focus in this thread on the 15 million, but I thought the rumour starts with a 6 month loan deal with an option to buy.

We are unlikely to pick up a seasoned premier league full-back in this window, and we are unlikely to have the money to pick one up in the summer, so it's probably a case of back to the short term loan option and W-P might be OK for us for the rest of the season.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 09 Jan 20 9.57am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by mattteo


Well, if the bosses saw this and went like "Hey, let's buy this guy!! He's amazing at 23! Had 3 assists in the Bournemouth game, 5 in 12 matches in the PL. Surely worth 15 million." then I have to say that they're getting really ripped off.

There are no assists! Look at the Tottenham- Bournemouth higlights: [Link]

He didn't even play. He has 400 minutes the entire season and has missed Tottenham's last 10 matches due to not making the squad.


Edited by mattteo (09 Jan 2020 2.34am)

Boxing Day 2018 he had 3 assists in 35 minutes against Bournemouth but as I have said many times on here IMO stats mean very little. If he can defend and assist going forward get him in

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Ginger Pubic Wig's Profile Ginger Pubic Wig Online Flag Wickham de L'Ouest 09 Jan 20 11.26am Send a Private Message to Ginger Pubic Wig Add Ginger Pubic Wig as a friend

Asked my Spurs supporting subordinate. He says KWP is a 20m player.

Maybe he isn't a world beater, maybe he's not even 15m, but hopefully -- if we get him in on a permanent -- he wouldn't be a financial disaster.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View black eagle.'s Profile black eagle. Flag south croydon. 09 Jan 20 11.33am Send a Private Message to black eagle. Add black eagle. as a friend

We better hurry up as now Br*ghton and Southampton are interested also.

.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Ginger Pubic Wig's Profile Ginger Pubic Wig Online Flag Wickham de L'Ouest 09 Jan 20 11.42am Send a Private Message to Ginger Pubic Wig Add Ginger Pubic Wig as a friend

Always going to have talk like that. We should always do our own business, with our own limits.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Online Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Jan 20 11.56am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by black eagle.

We better hurry up as now Br*ghton and Southampton are interested also.

.

Brighton already have Montoya and Schelotto who are right-backs.Alzate has filled-in at right-back but this is not his usual position.
Southampton have Cedric and Valery.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View SurbsEagle's Profile SurbsEagle Flag 09 Jan 20 12.26pm Send a Private Message to SurbsEagle Add SurbsEagle as a friend

Originally posted by mattteo

Yeah, well, he was 20 years old, not 22. He was ours, so we didn't pay for him and actually made quite a good profit.

If we pay 15 million for a 22 (soon to be 23 year old), how much do you think we're gonna sell him for in 3-4 years (when he'll be 26-27)? I can safely say it won't be for more than 20 million. Cause you only get an abnormally large sum for a player who is very young- like AWB was. It could be for nothing too, so they would be 15 million down the drain.

Kyle Walker was 26 (going on 27) when he was signed by Man City for 50m so it's not always based on age.
Also, with Bogle - he's probably NOT available on loan for 6 months with a view to buy. Derby will want cash up front. Cash that we could use on other signings while getting a full back for cheap for 6 months. Agree, he's a good player but if we make one full purchase this month - I'd rather it was on a striker than a full back

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 5 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Kyle Walker-Peters (Rumour)