You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Topic
July 19 2024 1.07am

Rhian Brewster (rumour) (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 15 of 23 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

Topic Locked

View Ecopalace's Profile Ecopalace Flag Wickham 24 Sep 20 8.23am Send a Private Message to Ecopalace Add Ecopalace as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

I still think the best deal here is a loan with an option to buy.

The deal for Bats, if we are to believe the rumour is that itís a loan deal with an obligation to buy. If that is truly the case then we are very likely to buy him permanently and he would have to be considered the clubs main striker.

Any other forward is for competition and depth...even if we do play two strikers. Are we really in a hurry to spend 25m on a substitute? I say get him on loan with an option to buy for a set fee. If that was possible of course.

Last I read, Palace had an option not obligation to buy....

Chelsea have handed Batshuayi a one-year contract extension, to protect his value and prevent him from leaving Stamford Bridge for free next summer. He will again wear the No 23 shirt for the club. Palace have an option ó rather than an obligation ó to purchase Batshuayi permanently at the end of the loan

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Hudsoneagle's Profile Hudsoneagle Flag 24 Sep 20 9.09am Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by Ecopalace

Last I read, Palace had an option not obligation to buy....

Chelsea have handed Batshuayi a one-year contract extension, to protect his value and prevent him from leaving Stamford Bridge for free next summer. He will again wear the No 23 shirt for the club. Palace have an option ó rather than an obligation ó to purchase Batshuayi permanently at the end of the loan

Iíve not read anything official for either case. There have been rumours that itís an obligation to buy...but the signing of a new deal does make that less likely else why bother with the new deal if we are obligated to buy him. Then again if the obligation is triggered by appearances for example then Chelsea would be wise to have a new contract in place in case of injury.

The jury is out on this one. Perhaps after a few goals there will be questions asked about whether Palace want him long term.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View eritheagle's Profile eritheagle Flag Erith 24 Sep 20 10.25am Send a Private Message to eritheagle Add eritheagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

Iíve not read anything official for either case. There have been rumours that itís an obligation to buy...but the signing of a new deal does make that less likely else why bother with the new deal if we are obligated to buy him. Then again if the obligation is triggered by appearances for example then Chelsea would be wise to have a new contract in place in case of injury.

The jury is out on this one. Perhaps after a few goals there will be questions asked about whether Palace want him long term.

Maybe we havenít got the money to buy him this season and Chelsea are just protecting their asset from leaving for free next year.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 24 Sep 20 10.26am Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

Iíve not read anything official for either case. There have been rumours that itís an obligation to buy...but the signing of a new deal does make that less likely else why bother with the new deal if we are obligated to buy him. Then again if the obligation is triggered by appearances for example then Chelsea would be wise to have a new contract in place in case of injury.

The jury is out on this one. Perhaps after a few goals there will be questions asked about whether Palace want him long term.


I thought I'd read somewhere that the loan was with an option to buy BUT the buying price had been fixed at £20m. In other words, if we wanted him at the end of the loan we would be OBLIGED to pay that sum.

But that may simply have been rumour or hear-say (or I might have even dreamt it

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View samprior's Profile samprior Flag Hamburg 24 Sep 20 11.48am Send a Private Message to samprior Add samprior as a friend

Originally posted by doombear


I thought I'd read somewhere that the loan was with an option to buy BUT the buying price had been fixed at £20m. In other words, if we wanted him at the end of the loan we would be OBLIGED to pay that sum.

But that may simply have been rumour or hear-say (or I might have even dreamt it

That was also my understanding. But I too may have had the same dream. I can't claim it's the gospel truth.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Hudsoneagle's Profile Hudsoneagle Flag 24 Sep 20 12.49pm Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by samprior

That was also my understanding. But I too may have had the same dream. I can't claim it's the gospel truth.

I don't think it's been quoted anywhere official so, as we are all well aware, most of what we have read on sports news websites is nothing but guess work.

What I would add is Palace certainly added an obligation to buy into the Sorloth loan deal, so it's certainly possible that they see that as a good way to do business.

My point though in bringing up Bats, is that if he does well I can see him staying. So are Palace going to go out and spend another £25m on a second striker?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Petereagle's Profile Petereagle Flag Brockley 24 Sep 20 2.16pm Send a Private Message to Petereagle Add Petereagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

I don't think it's been quoted anywhere official so, as we are all well aware, most of what we have read on sports news websites is nothing but guess work.

What I would add is Palace certainly added an obligation to buy into the Sorloth loan deal, so it's certainly possible that they see that as a good way to do business.

My point though in bringing up Bats, is that if he does well I can see him staying. So are Palace going to go out and spend another £25m on a second striker?


It's a good question, but in my opinion, it's absolutely essential to buy another striker. Sadly neither Benteke nor Wickham have proved effective, so we have to find ways to move them on, even at a loss

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Jacey's Profile Jacey Flag 24 Sep 20 8.39pm Send a Private Message to Jacey Add Jacey as a friend

Liverpool apparently want £25m and a buy back option,with Sheffield United being in pole position and barely a wimper from us.
At age 20,he would certainly bring down the average age of our aging squad!!


[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Petereagle's Profile Petereagle Flag Brockley 24 Sep 20 8.45pm Send a Private Message to Petereagle Add Petereagle as a friend

Originally posted by Jacey

Liverpool apparently want £25m and a buy back option,with Sheffield United being in pole position and barely a wimper from us.
At age 20,he would certainly bring down the average age of our aging squad!!


[Link]

The premature disclosures on Sky didn't help our cause. Remains to be seen whether an actual bid will materialise. But a new young striker seems to be our main remaining priority, so with time beginning to run out, something better happen soon!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 24 Sep 20 8.48pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Jacey

Liverpool apparently want £25m and a buy back option,with Sheffield United being in pole position and barely a wimper from us.
At age 20,he would certainly bring down the average age of our aging squad!!


[Link]

I think it's an okay price if not all up front. I will stick my neck out and say he will be a proven striker. He's the best I've seen us linked with recently. He's a mixture of pace, power, strength and some skill. The buy back clause is a strange one. Why sell if you're convinced he'll come good? Just loan him out. No big deal.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 24 Sep 20 10.29pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend


Going by tonightís score from Liverpoolís second string they donít need him that badly.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View dreamwaverider's Profile dreamwaverider Flag London 24 Sep 20 11.50pm Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider Add dreamwaverider as a friend

We would be mad to buy him. Weíve now got a great line up of forwards. Where will the money come from ? Unless of course our directors are paying. Preservation is the name of the game. Itís all about to get very messy financially in the football world. We are fine as we are now.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 15 of 23 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Topic