This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I was just wondering whether part of the add ins
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
croydon proud ![]() |
|
---|---|
No idea mate, but one thing I learned following Palace for 48 years is that any monies coming in don"t filter down, so wouldn"t worry about it. Back in the day when we would sell a player for a couple of million, you got excited about who we would bring in instead, maybe 2 million pound players? It never went that way, just lost a top player and replaced with a less experienced cheaper player, any monies from Man utd,won"t even make it in to the new stand fund- if there is one!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
If the positions were reversed probably yes. However Man United winning the league most seasons is a realistic proposition so agreeing to that is almost a guarantee. My uneducated guess is that Man United would probably structure payments based on appearances which for them would be a far safer transfer fee.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
There is still terms in Zaha contract, even though the one signed when he came back, expired and hes on new one Originally posted by Badger11
If the positions were reversed probably yes. However Man United winning the league most seasons is a realistic proposition so agreeing to that is almost a guarantee. My uneducated guess is that Man United would probably structure payments based on appearances which for them would be a far safer transfer fee.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.