You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > why a 3 year deal
August 18 2022 11.38pm

why a 3 year deal

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

 

View sydtheeagle's Profile sydtheeagle Flag England 05 Jul 21 8.14am Send a Private Message to sydtheeagle Add sydtheeagle as a friend

Originally posted by lexmark87

surely a 1 year deal would make more sense.
if it does not work out it will cost the club a fortune to get rid.

...is the wrong answer. Contracts, regardless of length, have buyout clauses that cap the amount of compensation owed (or required, depending on who terminates the contract) on premature termination. Three years is a standard contract. There will be premature termination clauses acceptable to both sides written into the contract.

 


Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eagle Black.'s Profile Eagle Black. Flag South Croydon 05 Jul 21 9.36am Send a Private Message to Eagle Black. Add Eagle Black. as a friend

Originally posted by doombear


Sorry, but a 1 year deal makes no sense at all. No manager in his right mind would accept such a deal when a club is asking him to rebuild and move them forward.

I agree,a one year deal is an insult,we should get behind Patrick.

I'm pretty excited about this appointment.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View topcat's Profile topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 05 Jul 21 9.45am Send a Private Message to topcat Add topcat as a friend

Barmy idea. A one year contract is an interim manager, it's great if the manager is a failure but crap if he's decent as he will be off with no compensation.

 


It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View taylors lovechild's Profile taylors lovechild Flag 05 Jul 21 10.08am Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Three years says you have confidence in the new manager and the future of the club, one year says to the players "the ground is on fire, everyone grab what you can and get the f**k out".

Interestingly (or maybe not) Nuno got a two-year deal at Spurs, which says to me Levy doesn't have confidence in him. He signed longer deals with Wolves, so I don't think Nuno asked for a short deal. What message does that send to the players?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 05 Jul 21 10.09am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

As others had said the length of the deal is not that important in relation to compensation as there will be a payout clause.

Not giving someone a 3 year deal shows a lack of faith.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Palace Old Geezer's Profile Palace Old Geezer Flag Midhurst 05 Jul 21 10.25am Send a Private Message to Palace Old Geezer Add Palace Old Geezer as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

As others had said the length of the deal is not that important in relation to compensation as there will be a payout clause.

Not giving someone a 3 year deal shows a lack of faith.

I agree.

3 years is the right way forward. It works both ways - SP demonstrates his confidence that PV will make a positive impact and PV feels reassured that he has the club's support.

And, as for Santo's deal at Spurs it shows neither of the above. That's how I see it anyway. Be fun when we play them! And Arsenal come to that.

 


Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Heath Eagle's Profile The Heath Eagle Flag Thornton Heath 05 Jul 21 10.26am Send a Private Message to The Heath Eagle Add The Heath Eagle as a friend

There are likely to be clauses in the contract.

For example if we are in the bottom 3 at the time of sacking plus more than 10 games have been played = payout reduced to 1 year maximum.

IF there are not any break clauses then it is on Parish, but there will be because he is not a total mug.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ex hibitionist's Profile ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 05 Jul 21 12.00pm Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

he should have a zero hours contract and be grateful for it, like the rest of us

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View croydon proud's Profile croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 05 Jul 21 9.34pm Send a Private Message to croydon proud Add croydon proud as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

he should have a zero hours contract and be grateful for it, like the rest of us

Ha, it"s the way forward in blighty mate!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > why a 3 year deal