You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Terror Attack Liverpool Hospital
November 28 2021 11.52am

Terror Attack Liverpool Hospital

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 9 << First< 5 6 7 8 9

 

View DanH's Profile DanH Flag SW2 18 Nov 21 11.03pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

The more urgent thing to address is surely the number of people who realise we are absurd in our dealings with failed asylum seekers and have allowed a system they can play.

Was just about to post this. Surely if his asylum application had failed surely him still being here is the biggest issue at play here.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 18 Nov 21 11.08pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

So are you content to allow “asylum seekers” who enter the UKi illegally and then lie to the authorities to remain?

As a basic principle, removal seems unarguable in such circumstances.

You will probably have better information than me, but I suspect that whilst the desire is there, the means may be stymied by international conventions and practicalities. Like where, and how to send him, if we don't enjoy good relations, have flights there, or they refuse to accept him.

No-body wants dirty washing dumped on them. If their home country can be shown by an efficient lawyer to present a risk, then we are between a rock and a hard place.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 18 Nov 21 11.12pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

Was just about to post this. Surely if his asylum application had failed surely him still being here is the biggest issue at play here.


The biggest issue for me seems like an abject failure of the security forces. For me, the red flags look blindingly obvious.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 19 Nov 21 8.51am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

So he’s suddenly a terrorist again rather than a nutjob?

Clutching at straws.

He is both, but he's not really a Christian is he Dan.

Your debating, and a few others, is at such a desperate level when you have to question my assertion that he was an Islamist.

It is quite pathetic really.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 19 Nov 21 9.37am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

We have sleep walked into a situation where we have so many who need monitoring we don't have the resources.

It is emerging that he was going to his mosque at the same time he started buying bomb components, coincidences abound

 


A lie will travel half way around the world before the truth has got it's shoes on.

When conceited septuagenarians opine , best to ignore.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 19 Nov 21 12.01pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

As a basic principle, removal seems unarguable in such circumstances.

You will probably have better information than me, but I suspect that whilst the desire is there, the means may be stymied by international conventions and practicalities. Like where, and how to send him, if we don't enjoy good relations, have flights there, or they refuse to accept him.

No-body wants dirty washing dumped on them. If their home country can be shown by an efficient lawyer to present a risk, then we are between a rock and a hard place.

To a certain extent you are correct. As I mentioned previously, the biggest problem with removing undocumented arrivals, is getting them documented ( if this makes sense). It is not unusual for them to claim to be a nationality that they are not. This bomber claimed to be a Syrian, which he was not. To remove anyone you need authority/acceptance from the receiving government.
Many years ago, Nigerian nationals were claiming to be Liberian, as they knew Liberians would not be removed, I was involved in a few who, we removed to Nigeria but on arrival they denied being Nigerian and were immediately returned to the UK.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 9 of 9 << First< 5 6 7 8 9

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Terror Attack Liverpool Hospital