You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Mateta off to Turkey?
January 30 2023 12.09pm

Mateta off to Turkey?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

 

View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 20 Jan 23 9.24am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins
Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins

 


Does anyone know the way? Did we hear someone say?
(We just haven't got a clue what to do!)
Does anyone know the way? There's got to be a way


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 20 Jan 23 10.11am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

As long as we get most of our money back let him go.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Putitout's Profile Putitout Online Flag Oxford 20 Jan 23 10.39am Send a Private Message to Putitout Add Putitout as a friend

Originally posted by MrRobbo

I agree that Ings isn't what we should be after, but I reckon he'll do well at WH.

And they are not short of a bob or 2, so paying 15m for 2 seasons wont hurt them like it would hurt us.

I agree with you and Plaistow, that neither Ings, or Antonio because of age ,more than other considerations would be ideal for Palace ,real progress. But both are proven and probably available, and in the present market not over expensive .
Itís clear Palace are into young and improving, but in Palaces case that always, as Mateta, and Sorloth, proves comes with the high chance they donít improve . And if a prospective youngster has actually scored a few goals at a decent level the price goes well beyond what we know Palace can go to .
Considering we didnít actually replace Benteke, Mateta, , would have to be replaced if Palace give up on him, and considering Palaces lack of fire power maybe an older head is what is needed, possibly with a younger back up.?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Croydon-Trucker's Profile Croydon-Trucker Flag Cahir 20 Jan 23 10.45am Send a Private Message to Croydon-Trucker Add Croydon-Trucker as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins
Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins

When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money .

 


Putin Go Fvck Yourself

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Online Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Jan 23 10.49am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Putitout

I agree with you and Plaistow, that neither Ings, or Antonio because of age ,more than other considerations would be ideal for Palace ,real progress. But both are proven and probably available, and in the present market not over expensive .
Itís clear Palace are into young and improving, but in Palaces case that always, as Mateta, and Sorloth, proves comes with the high chance they donít improve . And if a prospective youngster has actually scored a few goals at a decent level the price goes well beyond what we know Palace can go to .
Considering we didnít actually replace Benteke, Mateta, , would have to be replaced if Palace give up on him, and considering Palaces lack of fire power maybe an older head is what is needed, possibly with a younger back up.?

Patrick Vieira has recently asserted that the team needs experience and physicality.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 20 Jan 23 11.10am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker

When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money .

i think you are correct.

 


Does anyone know the way? Did we hear someone say?
(We just haven't got a clue what to do!)
Does anyone know the way? There's got to be a way


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Online Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Jan 23 11.15am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker


When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money .

I am not entirely sure apropos the outlay on Mateta.
Mn understanding was that there was a loan fee of £2.7 Mill with an obligation to buy after an agreed number of games for £13.5 Mill.
It has been reported that his transfer fee was £10 Mill but this might not include the loan fee.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View sydtheeagle's Profile sydtheeagle Flag England 20 Jan 23 12.17pm Send a Private Message to sydtheeagle Add sydtheeagle as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins
Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins

If these figures are accurate, Mateta has cost us £12.2 million (wages + salary) since joining. Edouard has cost us £17.9m over a period seven months shorter. Moving forward, keeping Mateta is costing us £600,000 a year (in wages) while keeping Edouard is costing us £1.1 million a year. Combined, that's £1.8 million a year in wages for two forwards who at best might give us ten goals a season. I'd say there's a good argument for replacing them with Gordon or Plange whose wages are probably very low in either case, and using the rest of the £1.8 million to attract a really good forward to whom we could pay a decent amount to attract him. Plange or Gordon plus a forward we paid as much as £140k a week would still cost less than Mateta and Edouard combined.

 


Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View taylors lovechild's Profile taylors lovechild Flag 20 Jan 23 12.58pm Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Originally posted by sydtheeagle

If these figures are accurate, Mateta has cost us £12.2 million (wages + salary) since joining. Edouard has cost us £17.9m over a period seven months shorter. Moving forward, keeping Mateta is costing us £600,000 a year (in wages) while keeping Edouard is costing us £1.1 million a year. Combined, that's £1.8 million a year in wages for two forwards who at best might give us ten goals a season. I'd say there's a good argument for replacing them with Gordon or Plange whose wages are probably very low in either case, and using the rest of the £1.8 million to attract a really good forward to whom we could pay a decent amount to attract him. Plange or Gordon plus a forward we paid as much as £140k a week would still cost less than Mateta and Edouard combined.

I think your maths is off: 50k pw x 52 weeks is £2.6 million, while 94k pw x 52 weeks is £4.9 million per year. So if those weekly wages are correct they cost us about £7.5 million a year in wages. Bargain.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EddieMac's Profile EddieMac Flag 20 Jan 23 1.56pm Send a Private Message to EddieMac Add EddieMac as a friend

Originally posted by HesHereHesThere

Hope that comes off as heís fíing useless. His first touch is appalling.

His 2nd, 3rd and 4th touches are not much better. Iíl be glad to see the back of him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rob1969's Profile rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 20 Jan 23 2.53pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend

Or hopefully only 12.5M !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rob1969's Profile rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 20 Jan 23 2.54pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend

Or hopefully only 12.5M !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Mateta off to Turkey?