Mateta off to Turkey?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Lanzo-Ad Online Lanzarote 20 Jan 23 9.24am
Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins “That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn
Alert a moderator to this post

Lanzo-Ad Online

Lanzarote 20 Jan 23 9.24am

Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins
Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins

“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 20 Jan 23 10.11am
As long as we get most of our money back let him go. One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 20 Jan 23 10.11am

As long as we get most of our money back let him go.

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Putitout Oxford 20 Jan 23 10.39am
Originally posted by MrRobbo I agree that Ings isn't what we should be after, but I reckon he'll do well at WH. And they are not short of a bob or 2, so paying 15m for 2 seasons wont hurt them like it would hurt us. I agree with you and Plaistow, that neither Ings, or Antonio because of age ,more than other considerations would be ideal for Palace ,real progress. But both are proven and probably available, and in the present market not over expensive . It’s clear Palace are into young and improving, but in Palaces case that always, as Mateta, and Sorloth, proves comes with the high chance they don’t improve . And if a prospective youngster has actually scored a few goals at a decent level the price goes well beyond what we know Palace can go to . Considering we didn’t actually replace Benteke, Mateta, , would have to be replaced if Palace give up on him, and considering Palaces lack of fire power maybe an older head is what is needed, possibly with a younger back up.?
Alert a moderator to this post

Putitout

Oxford 20 Jan 23 10.39am

Originally posted by MrRobbo

I agree that Ings isn't what we should be after, but I reckon he'll do well at WH.

And they are not short of a bob or 2, so paying 15m for 2 seasons wont hurt them like it would hurt us.

I agree with you and Plaistow, that neither Ings, or Antonio because of age ,more than other considerations would be ideal for Palace ,real progress. But both are proven and probably available, and in the present market not over expensive .
It’s clear Palace are into young and improving, but in Palaces case that always, as Mateta, and Sorloth, proves comes with the high chance they don’t improve . And if a prospective youngster has actually scored a few goals at a decent level the price goes well beyond what we know Palace can go to .
Considering we didn’t actually replace Benteke, Mateta, , would have to be replaced if Palace give up on him, and considering Palaces lack of fire power maybe an older head is what is needed, possibly with a younger back up.?

Alert a moderator to this post

Croydon-Trucker 20 Jan 23 10.45am
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money .
Alert a moderator to this post

Croydon-Trucker

20 Jan 23 10.45am

Send a Private Message to Croydon-Trucker

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins
Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins

When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money .

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Jan 23 10.49am
Originally posted by Putitout I agree with you and Plaistow, that neither Ings, or Antonio because of age ,more than other considerations would be ideal for Palace ,real progress. But both are proven and probably available, and in the present market not over expensive . It’s clear Palace are into young and improving, but in Palaces case that always, as Mateta, and Sorloth, proves comes with the high chance they don’t improve . And if a prospective youngster has actually scored a few goals at a decent level the price goes well beyond what we know Palace can go to . Considering we didn’t actually replace Benteke, Mateta, , would have to be replaced if Palace give up on him, and considering Palaces lack of fire power maybe an older head is what is needed, possibly with a younger back up.? Patrick Vieira has recently asserted that the team needs experience and physicality.
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Jan 23 10.49am

Originally posted by Putitout

I agree with you and Plaistow, that neither Ings, or Antonio because of age ,more than other considerations would be ideal for Palace ,real progress. But both are proven and probably available, and in the present market not over expensive .
It’s clear Palace are into young and improving, but in Palaces case that always, as Mateta, and Sorloth, proves comes with the high chance they don’t improve . And if a prospective youngster has actually scored a few goals at a decent level the price goes well beyond what we know Palace can go to .
Considering we didn’t actually replace Benteke, Mateta, , would have to be replaced if Palace give up on him, and considering Palaces lack of fire power maybe an older head is what is needed, possibly with a younger back up.?

Patrick Vieira has recently asserted that the team needs experience and physicality.

Alert a moderator to this post

Lanzo-Ad Online Lanzarote 20 Jan 23 11.10am
Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money . i think you are correct. “That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn
Alert a moderator to this post

Lanzo-Ad Online

Lanzarote 20 Jan 23 11.10am

Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker

When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money .

i think you are correct.

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Jan 23 11.15am
Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money . I am not entirely sure apropos the outlay on Mateta. Mn understanding was that there was a loan fee of £2.7 Mill with an obligation to buy after an agreed number of games for £13.5 Mill. It has been reported that his transfer fee was £10 Mill but this might not include the loan fee.
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 20 Jan 23 11.15am

Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker

When you see it like that a person would have to say what a waste of money .

I am not entirely sure apropos the outlay on Mateta.
Mn understanding was that there was a loan fee of £2.7 Mill with an obligation to buy after an agreed number of games for £13.5 Mill.
It has been reported that his transfer fee was £10 Mill but this might not include the loan fee.

Alert a moderator to this post

sydtheeagle England 20 Jan 23 12.17pm
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins If these figures are accurate, Mateta has cost us £12.2 million (wages + salary) since joining. Edouard has cost us £17.9m over a period seven months shorter. Moving forward, keeping Mateta is costing us £600,000 a year (in wages) while keeping Edouard is costing us £1.1 million a year. Combined, that's £1.8 million a year in wages for two forwards who at best might give us ten goals a season. I'd say there's a good argument for replacing them with Gordon or Plange whose wages are probably very low in either case, and using the rest of the £1.8 million to attract a really good forward to whom we could pay a decent amount to attract him. Plange or Gordon plus a forward we paid as much as £140k a week would still cost less than Mateta and Edouard combined. Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.
Alert a moderator to this post

sydtheeagle

England 20 Jan 23 12.17pm

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Mateta 6 out of 10, Cost 11m, reputed salary 50k a week, goal every 252 mins
Eduoard 5 out of 10,Cost 16.3M, reputed salary 94k a week, goal every 273 mins

If these figures are accurate, Mateta has cost us £12.2 million (wages + salary) since joining. Edouard has cost us £17.9m over a period seven months shorter. Moving forward, keeping Mateta is costing us £600,000 a year (in wages) while keeping Edouard is costing us £1.1 million a year. Combined, that's £1.8 million a year in wages for two forwards who at best might give us ten goals a season. I'd say there's a good argument for replacing them with Gordon or Plange whose wages are probably very low in either case, and using the rest of the £1.8 million to attract a really good forward to whom we could pay a decent amount to attract him. Plange or Gordon plus a forward we paid as much as £140k a week would still cost less than Mateta and Edouard combined.

Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Alert a moderator to this post

taylors lovechild 20 Jan 23 12.58pm
Originally posted by sydtheeagle If these figures are accurate, Mateta has cost us £12.2 million (wages + salary) since joining. Edouard has cost us £17.9m over a period seven months shorter. Moving forward, keeping Mateta is costing us £600,000 a year (in wages) while keeping Edouard is costing us £1.1 million a year. Combined, that's £1.8 million a year in wages for two forwards who at best might give us ten goals a season. I'd say there's a good argument for replacing them with Gordon or Plange whose wages are probably very low in either case, and using the rest of the £1.8 million to attract a really good forward to whom we could pay a decent amount to attract him. Plange or Gordon plus a forward we paid as much as £140k a week would still cost less than Mateta and Edouard combined. I think your maths is off: 50k pw x 52 weeks is £2.6 million, while 94k pw x 52 weeks is £4.9 million per year. So if those weekly wages are correct they cost us about £7.5 million a year in wages. Bargain.
Alert a moderator to this post

taylors lovechild

20 Jan 23 12.58pm

Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild

Originally posted by sydtheeagle

I think your maths is off: 50k pw x 52 weeks is £2.6 million, while 94k pw x 52 weeks is £4.9 million per year. So if those weekly wages are correct they cost us about £7.5 million a year in wages. Bargain.

Alert a moderator to this post

EddieMac 20 Jan 23 1.56pm
Originally posted by HesHereHesThere Hope that comes off as he’s f’ing useless. His first touch is appalling. His 2nd, 3rd and 4th touches are not much better. I’l be glad to see the back of him.
Alert a moderator to this post

EddieMac

20 Jan 23 1.56pm