Last Saturday.!
I saw Olise hairing across the pitch then suddenly pull up with the HSI he went on the pitch with.

A lot of muscle injuries are caused by an imbalence i.e. the opposing muscle is stronger. In the case of the hamstring the bigger and stronger Quad muscles. Therefore the hamstring is normally put in a precarious position as the stabalising muscle when quads are being used (a lot by footballers) and therefore bear a large brunt on them (as well as performing their other function when the leg is bent at the knee and heel is curled towards the buttocks) and have to be treated very carefully.

On another note though, I remember hearing Michael Owen describing how he suffered a lot of hamstring injuries when younger.
They discovered he was sitting wrongly on his car seat when driving and edge of seat was digging into his hamstring. Once he corrected his position he didn't suffer again.

Two months back for 10 mins again and his season will be done. ….thats the likely scenario.

I wouldn’t have brought him on ….but having said that he’s either fit to play and on the bench or he’s not fit to play and not on the bench. You don’t allow half fit players to be selected….what on earth are the physio staff doing it’s madness.

Never sure who Roy is referring to when he talks about “medics”. Given his relatively recent surgery and the discomfort he’s had since then it should be the surgical rehab team and as a former rehab consultant I can’t imagine a trained specialist doctor offering the suggestion he was fit enough for half a game especially coming on cold at half time when everyone else has had 45 minutes under their belt.

There is a mix of ineptitude and poor management by all concerned here, IMO.
IF, as had been stated by ‘the medical team’ that Olise’ was fit enough to play, then why not start him, especially against Brighton who were coming into the game off a heavy defeat? We all agree bringing him on when the game was lost made no sense, as was keeping him on until 85 mins or so against the Blades when 3-1 up. Both decision make whoever had final say culpable. I question the medical teams competence as he was clearly not fully ready, and Roy et al who ‘did a Boris’ and were ‘guided by the medical science’’, but screwed up by bringing him on when 0-3 down. Likely as not it wouldn’t have made a difference had he been started, but at least we wouldn’t now be questioning Roy and co for their decision.

we train the players as athletes instead of footballers the more sprints you do the more likely that you will damage a muscle , sprinters don't do half as much running in training as footballers do in a match ,
you know as a player if you are ok if the physio doesn't see you flitch when tested they can only go by the data the player shows , yes x-ray but will only show a tear not anything else , and as said by some its not just our club that have this issue ,
lot todo with VAR standing around for 5 mins waiting for that , is not good , i do speak from experience as i got older the hamstring started playing up more and i was a quick , and i had a friend from the age of 20 had his hamstring going alot , spent alot on the bench and didnt come right until nearer 30 , so wrap them up in cotton wool and then you will be complaining that we are not playing them its a no win