You are here: Home > Message Board > Gold Talk > who you dislike on HOL?
March 29 2024 11.01am

who you dislike on HOL?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 39 of 46 < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 >

 

View skatman's Profile skatman Flag 17 Oct 09 10.08am Send a Private Message to skatman Add skatman as a friend

Quote braunstoneagle at 17 Oct 2009 10:04am

Quote Penge Eagle at 17 Oct 2009 12:29am

One solution could be to have moderators post anonymously under a different account eg Admin1, Admin 2 etc then it's not personal?


identitys wouldnt stay secret for long.

peoples posting styles would give it away, staffie would be easy to identify for example.

why change something if its not broken?

Completely agree Brauny.

Why succumb to whingers? This is a bloody good, bloody popular site, with a good set of 'regulars' who dont want to see any change. If the others dont like it, screw em!


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View braunstoneagle's Profile braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 17 Oct 09 10.17am Send a Private Message to braunstoneagle Add braunstoneagle as a friend

Quote skatman at 17 Oct 2009 10:08am

Quote braunstoneagle at 17 Oct 2009 10:04am

Quote Penge Eagle at 17 Oct 2009 12:29am

One solution could be to have moderators post anonymously under a different account eg Admin1, Admin 2 etc then it's not personal?


identitys wouldnt stay secret for long.

peoples posting styles would give it away, staffie would be easy to identify for example.

why change something if its not broken?

Completely agree Brauny.

Why succumb to whingers? This is a bloody good, bloody popular site, with a good set of 'regulars' who dont want to see any change. If the others dont like it, screw em!



we shouldnt...penge & guntri do a sterling job of keeping this site going, and in a nutshell...if people dont like it, they can fudge off to the bbs

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mr Statto's Profile Mr Statto Flag Ifield 19 Oct 09 12.50pm Send a Private Message to Mr Statto Add Mr Statto as a friend

Quote braunstoneagle at 17 Oct 2009 10:04am

Quote Penge Eagle at 17 Oct 2009 12:29am

One solution could be to have moderators post anonymously under a different account eg Admin1, Admin 2 etc then it's not personal?


identitys wouldnt stay secret for long.

peoples posting styles would give it away, staffie would be easy to identify for example.

why change something if its not broken?

The alternative would be that moderators weren't identified at all. If a thread needs moderating it could just say it has been, but not who by.

 


That's just the ramblings of a madman

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Sash's Profile The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 19 Oct 09 1.18pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Perhaps there should be a rule where mods can only post in false beards and wigs to disguise their true indentities..

Honestly !!!


These guys do a fab job in keeping this place a great little corner of the interweb to while away time, have a laugh and let off the odd bit of virtual steam.

We dont have the cliquey, pseudo-intellectualist elite who prowl the bbs and wum arseholes dont tend to be here very long before the red comes out.

People getting their knickers in a twist over nothing and as had been said, like any product or service - If you dont like whats on offer its simple - Go somewhere else...

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 19 Oct 09 1.56pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Dweeb at 16 Oct 2009 5:12pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 14 Oct 2009 8:55am

Quote Jim'll Fist It For U at 13 Oct 2009 9:43pm

Quote Dweeb at 13 Oct 2009 9:06pm
And as moderators wield power it cannot be said to be a level playing field, where mere mortals pay the ultimate price.


The ultimate price?

Have you been reading the Encyclopedia Dramatica?


Spliff & a cuppa tea for breakfast & this made me laugh! great morning already!

Well no one moderates the moderators, do they. Penge, I believe, says he speaks with only one voice. How can a 'moderator' say they apply the rules, when some moderators go round slagging people off.

Still I shall be moving along shortly.

Edited by Dweeb (16 Oct 2009 5:15pm)


Flouncy flounce flounce.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dweeb's Profile Dweeb Flag East London 19 Oct 09 3.17pm Send a Private Message to Dweeb Add Dweeb as a friend

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 19 Oct 2009 1:56pm

Quote Dweeb at 16 Oct 2009 5:12pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 14 Oct 2009 8:55am

Quote Jim'll Fist It For U at 13 Oct 2009 9:43pm

Quote Dweeb at 13 Oct 2009 9:06pm
And as moderators wield power it cannot be said to be a level playing field, where mere mortals pay the ultimate price.


The ultimate price?

Have you been reading the Encyclopedia Dramatica?


Spliff & a cuppa tea for breakfast & this made me laugh! great morning already!

Well no one moderates the moderators, do they. Penge, I believe, says he speaks with only one voice. How can a 'moderator' say they apply the rules, when some moderators go round slagging people off.

Still I shall be moving along shortly.

Edited by Dweeb (16 Oct 2009 5:15pm)


Flouncy flounce flounce.


Nope just a statement of the inevitable, but thanks for your didactic intervention.

 


Taking the bungy jump since 1964. Never to see John Jackson in a shirt again

Sorry to see Lee Hills go, did we ever see Alex Marrow? We did January 2013

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Cucking Funt's Profile Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 19 Oct 09 5.03pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

So, which mod slagged who off, and when?

Do tell.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View gambler's Profile gambler Flag Kent 19 Oct 09 5.05pm Send a Private Message to gambler Add gambler as a friend

sllllllllllllaaaaaaaaaaaaaagggggggggg

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Ouzo Dan's Profile Ouzo Dan 26 Oct 09 1.02pm Send a Private Message to Ouzo Dan Add Ouzo Dan as a friend

I meant no slight towards Cucking on my previous post as reading through it seems its caused a little aggro, he is an excellent moderator, Long may his tenure continue.

Personally I think id be a s*** moderator.

Edited by Ouzo Dan (26 Oct 2009 3:09pm)

 


Sex Panther 60% of the time it works every time

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View TomThePalaceFanatic's Profile TomThePalaceFanatic Flag 26 Oct 09 6.31pm Send a Private Message to TomThePalaceFanatic Add TomThePalaceFanatic as a friend

Quote Ouzo Dan at 26 Oct 2009 1:02pm

I meant no slight towards Cucking on my previous post as reading through it seems its caused a little aggro, he is an excellent moderator, Long may his tenure continue.

Personally I think id be a s*** moderator.

Edited by Ouzo Dan (26 Oct 2009 3:09pm)


Agreed. Oh sorry did I type that?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 26 Oct 09 6.42pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Dweeb at 19 Oct 2009 3:17pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 19 Oct 2009 1:56pm

Quote Dweeb at 16 Oct 2009 5:12pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 14 Oct 2009 8:55am

Quote Jim'll Fist It For U at 13 Oct 2009 9:43pm

Quote Dweeb at 13 Oct 2009 9:06pm
And as moderators wield power it cannot be said to be a level playing field, where mere mortals pay the ultimate price.


The ultimate price?

Have you been reading the Encyclopedia Dramatica?


Spliff & a cuppa tea for breakfast & this made me laugh! great morning already!

Well no one moderates the moderators, do they. Penge, I believe, says he speaks with only one voice. How can a 'moderator' say they apply the rules, when some moderators go round slagging people off.

Still I shall be moving along shortly.

Edited by Dweeb (16 Oct 2009 5:15pm)


Flouncy flounce flounce.


Nope just a statement of the inevitable, but thanks for your didactic intervention.


Due to my lack of intelligence or continuous reading of the dictionary I decided to investigate what your clever wording meant so I looked it up & found:

1. intended for instruction; instructive: didactic poetry.
2. inclined to teach or lecture others too much: a boring, didactic speaker.
3. teaching or intending to teach a moral lesson.

I choose to be #1 if that's ok? I don't really hold the high ground needed for #3 & I don't teach or lecture so that blows out #2 as well.

I'm taking it as a compliment & thank you for your kind words

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jelholyoake Flag 26 Oct 09 6.54pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 26 Oct 2009 6:42pm

Quote Dweeb at 19 Oct 2009 3:17pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 19 Oct 2009 1:56pm

Quote Dweeb at 16 Oct 2009 5:12pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 14 Oct 2009 8:55am

Quote Jim'll Fist It For U at 13 Oct 2009 9:43pm

Quote Dweeb at 13 Oct 2009 9:06pm
And as moderators wield power it cannot be said to be a level playing field, where mere mortals pay the ultimate price.


The ultimate price?

Have you been reading the Encyclopedia Dramatica?


Spliff & a cuppa tea for breakfast & this made me laugh! great morning already!

Well no one moderates the moderators, do they. Penge, I believe, says he speaks with only one voice. How can a 'moderator' say they apply the rules, when some moderators go round slagging people off.

Still I shall be moving along shortly.

Edited by Dweeb (16 Oct 2009 5:15pm)


Flouncy flounce flounce.


Nope just a statement of the inevitable, but thanks for your didactic intervention.


Due to my lack of intelligence or continuous reading of the dictionary I decided to investigate what your clever wording meant so I looked it up & found:

1. intended for instruction; instructive: didactic poetry.
2. inclined to teach or lecture others too much: a boring, didactic speaker.
3. teaching or intending to teach a moral lesson.

I choose to be #1 if that's ok? I don't really hold the high ground needed for #3 & I don't teach or lecture so that blows out #2 as well.

I'm taking it as a compliment & thank you for your kind words

Glad it's not me, i look things up too if i think people are trying to be clever with me. Nothing easier than trying to speak in simple terms, although trying to be clever sometimes ends up learnign something new.


 


When i see him, it's gonna be painful. Skinny little cont.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 39 of 46 < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Gold Talk > who you dislike on HOL?