Coronavirus (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 eaglesdare  25 Aug 22 10.13am |
  |
|---|---|
|
With each passing day I feel more relieved that I made the correct and informed decision to not take the vaccine.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
grumpymort  US/Thailand/UK 25 Aug 22 12.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Big. deal!!! That was just a typo. The picture of her and the lady on the video are quite different. The lady on the video wears similar glasses and clothing. Additionally it is said she has “impersonators”. Never trust videos from unedited, unregulated, unreliable sources. That’s the way conspiracy theories and Putin style propaganda gets spread. Funny stuff you know youtube is very strict with this type of thing in fact they are over the top if you go against mainstream which is why so many have been forced to leave the platform. After all this time you are still coming out with rubbish. I am still waiting for your claims of massive deaths and lockdowns not much time left in the year and what was the other one how the unvaccinated will cause mutations which will become deadly for us all not being fair to the vax people. The other one was how the vax are completely safe they are not an issue its the virus reason fro people with health problems (told you then do your research you need to brush up now with a lot of data coming out with people having serious problems due to them)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Aug 22 12.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by grumpymort
Funny stuff you know youtube is very strict with this type of thing in fact they are ov After all this time you are still coming out with rubbish. I am still waiting for your claims of massive deaths and lockdowns not much time left in the year and what was the other one how the unvaccinated will cause mutations which will become deadly for us all not being fair to the vax people. The other one was how the vax are completely safe they are not an issue its the virus reason fro people with health problems (told you then do your research you need to brush up now with a lot of data coming out with people having serious problems due to them) As I said I wouldn’t stake my life on it but the info I found suggests this has a bad odour and YouTube have missed it. It wouldn’t be the first time. Let’s see if they take it down. I don’t recognise either of the asserted “claims”. Maybe your description of them needs some refinement! Kindly give the precise references so I can review them in their context, rather than in yours.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Aug 22 1.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
DIPAG As I said, I wouldn't stake my life on it and having read her Twitter it seems more likely she would say something like this than not. All I was doing was being healthily sceptical, not making definitive claims. It seems she has quite a history of being "controversial" over the pandemic and the responses to it. For an alternative perspective on her approach, take a look at this:-
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 25 Aug 22 2.20pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
WE does his normal distraction stuff. What is important is what is being said and whether it's true or not.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
HKOwen  Hong Kong 25 Aug 22 11.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As I said, I wouldn't stake my life on it and having read her Twitter it seems more likely she would say something like this than not. All I was doing was being healthily sceptical, not making definitive claims. It seems she has quite a history of being "controversial" over the pandemic and the responses to it. For an alternative perspective on her approach, take a look at this:- Wrong and making accusations with no basis in fact, what a
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 26 Aug 22 12.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Big. deal!!! That was just a typo. The picture of her and the lady on the video are quite different. The lady on the video wears similar glasses and clothing. Additionally it is said she has “impersonators”. Never trust videos from unedited, unregulated, unreliable sources. That’s the way conspiracy theories and Putin style propaganda gets spread. It's actually a massive deal. If you input incorrect data, you get incorrect results. You looked up the wrong name, you got the wrong result. Why can you not admit that? It's quite easy to understand. Input 2 plus 2, it equals 4, but if you accidentally input 2 plus 22 (easy typo), you get 24. And if we were talking percentage of deaths from covid, that's a serious discrepancy.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Ouzo Dan  Behind you 26 Aug 22 7.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
With Fauci stepping down & increasing evidence that these gene therapy experiments are harming people, it's interesting to note blame is quietly being shifted towards Trump.
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Attachment: | Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 26 Aug 22 8.42am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Wrong and making accusations with no basis in fact, what a . Are you 100% sure she was the lady in the video? She says she has impersonators and what is said there seems extreme, even for her. I am not sure. It might be, but perhaps not. So are you? If so how and why?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 26 Aug 22 8.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
It's actually a massive deal. If you input incorrect data, you get incorrect results. You looked up the wrong name, you got the wrong result. Why can you not admit that? It's quite easy to understand. Input 2 plus 2, it equals 4, but if you accidentally input 2 plus 22 (easy typo), you get 24. And if we were talking percentage of deaths from covid, that's a serious discrepancy. Wrong! I inputted correct data but typed the name incorrectly in the response.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 26 Aug 22 2.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
WE does his normal distraction stuff. What is important is what is being said and whether it's true or not. As this lady has a dubious reputation as a spreader of scare stories, the veracity of her assertions must necessarily be questioned. She might be right. A blind dart player sometimes gets a bull. By all means check for accuracy. That's all I am actually arguing for, but never accept this kind of thing at face value when the source is unreliable.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 26 Aug 22 2.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As this lady has a dubious reputation as a spreader of scare stories, the veracity of her assertions must necessarily be questioned. She might be right. A blind dart player sometimes gets a bull. By all means check for accuracy. That's all I am actually arguing for, but never accept this kind of thing at face value when the source is unreliable. I have no issues with that skepticism, I view skepticism as healthy in most cases. What is true is far more important than opinion reinforcement. I would ask for nothing more than what she said impartially investigated and its veracity ascertained. Edited by Stirlingsays (26 Aug 2022 2.55pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.