Topic

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Page 981 of 1255 < 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 >

Topic Locked

W12 02 Dec 21 1.57pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Wow. You really have got it bad. Your article is from a David McLoone. The extra 18 deaths he mentions over a 7 week period could be for any number of reasons. I note he has made no adjustment for seasonality for example. He is simply trying to imply a causality, even when saying the reasons for deaths are unpublished, due to being a raving conspiracy theorist Presumably you go on that site a lot, I expect you feel strongly about abortion Meanwhile the information is ridiculously easy to find about any adverse reaction to the vaccines. [Link] Edited by Mapletree (02 Dec 2021 1.54pm) Why are you changing the subject to abortion?
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 1.57pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Wow. You really have got it bad. Your article is from a David McLoone. The extra 18 deaths he mentions over a 7 week period could be for any number of reasons. I note he has made no adjustment for seasonality for example.

He is simply trying to imply a causality, even when saying the reasons for deaths are unpublished, due to being a raving conspiracy theorist

Presumably you go on that site a lot, I expect you feel strongly about abortion

Meanwhile the information is ridiculously easy to find about any adverse reaction to the vaccines.

[Link]

Edited by Mapletree (02 Dec 2021 1.54pm)

Why are you changing the subject to abortion?

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 1.58pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle It's disgraceful scaremongering of the worst kind. Even the article itself says there is no established correlation between these statistics, which even if correct are on such a low base as to make statistical variance the most likely reason, let alone seasonal factors. Someone needs to investigate the authenticity asap and ensure the truth is known. Of course, it's really for US consumption as fodder for the so called "pro-life" lobby who are poised to claim a significant change in the law there. Why are you changing the subject to abortion?
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 1.58pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It's disgraceful scaremongering of the worst kind.

Even the article itself says there is no established correlation between these statistics, which even if correct are on such a low base as to make statistical variance the most likely reason, let alone seasonal factors.

Someone needs to investigate the authenticity asap and ensure the truth is known.

Of course, it's really for US consumption as fodder for the so called "pro-life" lobby who are poised to claim a significant change in the law there.

Why are you changing the subject to abortion?

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 02 Dec 21 2.05pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Wow. You really have got it bad. Your article is from a David McLoone. The extra 18 deaths he mentions over a 7 week period could be for any number of reasons. I note he has made no adjustment for seasonality for example. He is simply trying to imply a causality, even when saying the reasons for deaths are unpublished, due to being a raving conspiracy theorist Presumably you go on that site a lot, I expect you feel strongly about abortion Meanwhile the information is ridiculously easy to find about any adverse reaction to the vaccines. [Link] Edited by Mapletree (02 Dec 2021 1.54pm) Wow, what a crime. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

02 Dec 21 2.05pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

He is simply trying to imply a causality, even when saying the reasons for deaths are unpublished, due to being a raving conspiracy theorist

Presumably you go on that site a lot, I expect you feel strongly about abortion

Meanwhile the information is ridiculously easy to find about any adverse reaction to the vaccines.

[Link]

Edited by Mapletree (02 Dec 2021 1.54pm)

Wow, what a crime.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.11pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Wow, what a crime. Agreed but don't let these f***ers defer
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.11pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Wow, what a crime.

Agreed but don't let these f***ers defer

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.12pm
The government data: Attachment: Screenshot 2021-12-02 at 14.03.52.png (229.80Kb)
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.12pm

The government data:

Attachment: Screenshot 2021-12-02 at 14.03.52.png (229.80Kb)

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.15pm
[Link] "It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported"
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.15pm

[Link]

"It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported"

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.16pm
"disgraceful scaremongering"
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.16pm

"disgraceful scaremongering"

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.53pm
f***ing crickets of course
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 2.53pm

f***ing crickets of course

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 3.08pm
Originally posted by W12 Why are you changing the subject to abortion? Because I wasn't! My comment was on the scaremongering, which your subsequent comments have done nothing to dispel. That your source is a so called "pro-life", advocate which is claimed to have been founded on "Christian" principals, with its primary readership in the USA caused the speculation on why it would publish such an article, on UK statistics, at this time. Of course, it might be that they are genuinely interested in what is happening here. Or just that they are anti-vax for children alongside their other stances. You have your opinion. I have mine. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 3.08pm

Originally posted by W12

Why are you changing the subject to abortion?

Because I wasn't!

My comment was on the scaremongering, which your subsequent comments have done nothing to dispel.

That your source is a so called "pro-life", advocate which is claimed to have been founded on "Christian" principals, with its primary readership in the USA caused the speculation on why it would publish such an article, on UK statistics, at this time.

Of course, it might be that they are genuinely interested in what is happening here. Or just that they are anti-vax for children alongside their other stances. You have your opinion. I have mine.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 3.11pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Because I wasn't! My comment was on the scaremongering, which your subsequent comments have done nothing to dispel. That your source is a so called "pro-life", advocate which is claimed to have been founded on "Christian" principals, with its primary readership in the USA caused the speculation on why it would publish such an article, on UK statistics, at this time. Of course, it might be that they are genuinely interested in what is happening here. Or just that they are anti-vax for children alongside their other stances. You have your opinion. I have mine. You seem to have conveniently ignored a few posts
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 02 Dec 21 3.11pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Because I wasn't!

My comment was on the scaremongering, which your subsequent comments have done nothing to dispel.

Of course, it might be that they are genuinely interested in what is happening here. Or just that they are anti-vax for children alongside their other stances. You have your opinion. I have mine.

You seem to have conveniently ignored a few posts

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 3.15pm
Originally posted by W12 You seem to have conveniently ignored a few posts No. I read them all. Nothing you have said, or provided, suggests anything other than that article is scaremongering. It seeks to suggest that there is a link between the vaccination of children and an increased mortality, when no such link has been established, nor, to my current knowledge, can it be. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 3.15pm

Originally posted by W12

You seem to have conveniently ignored a few posts

No. I read them all. Nothing you have said, or provided, suggests anything other than that article is scaremongering. It seeks to suggest that there is a link between the vaccination of children and an increased mortality, when no such link has been established, nor, to my current knowledge, can it be.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post