You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
May 14 2024 1.03am

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 265 of 412 < 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 >

 

View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 09 Jul 23 11.57am Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

David Attenborough?

He has enough sordid natural footage for a lifetime.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View beak's Profile beak Flag croydon 09 Jul 23 12.08pm Send a Private Message to beak Add beak as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

He has enough sordid natural footage for a lifetime.

He has lead a wildlife.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Forest Hillbilly's Profile Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 09 Jul 23 12.21pm Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

Look out for Songs of Praise today. Will there be an absence of some smug presenter. ?

 


"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Flag Oxford 09 Jul 23 12.47pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

OK, agreed. As for the clamour I'm afraid that is standard media practice the other outlets are trying to get the BBC to out this person rather than naming him themself.

The BBC can't cry foul over this because they have done the same in the past and no doubt will do so in the future. I'm afraid it's all part of the dog eat dog mentality of that industry, relishing another company's discomfort and then going all holier than thou when it's them.

The BBC has had great fun over the phone hacking scandal putting the boot into the tabloids who are now getting their own back.

Good points.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 09 Jul 23 12.51pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Is it a crime? The child was 17. I'm not condoning it - merely wondering the legality here

Yes it is under Protection of Children Act. as amended by the Sexual Offences Act This covers anyone under the age of 18

Edited by Spiderman (09 Jul 2023 1.09pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 09 Jul 23 3.25pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

Yes it is under Protection of Children Act. as amended by the Sexual Offences Act This covers anyone under the age of 18

Edited by Spiderman (09 Jul 2023 1.09pm)

Only because Blair forced kids to stay at school. Prior to this 16 was an age thought to be adult enough to see right from wrong. I mean you could get married at 16 (well from feb this year it’s 18 ) and drive at 17.
Is return post expensive?

Edited by cryrst (09 Jul 2023 3.26pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 09 Jul 23 3.48pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

Huw could you possibly mean?

Indeed.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 09 Jul 23 3.54pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13


Welcome back Stirls . . .

Could this possibly mean there will no more 'Snowman' at xmas?

Ha!

Who knows, but from what I'm hearing I think he's in the clear....he'll be walking in the air about it.

Still, it's all just second hand information until it's officially revealed.

I will say that I support the facts being established before that.....we don't want another 'Cliff Richard' situation.

However, this has apparently been known about for some time. If so that tells you quite a lot about how the BBC treats this stuff.

Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jul 2023 3.55pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 09 Jul 23 3.58pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Is it a crime? The child was 17. I'm not condoning it - merely wondering the legality here


No, but pretty bad considering the circumstances.

I expect if this were Mick Jagger the reaction would still rightly be disapproving but different. When someone behaves so differently in private from their public persona then it does end up destroying them......Imagine the Pope doing the same and while it isn't illegal it's just not compatible with the role they took on.

And if the stuff about crack cocaine is true then just another layer of bad.

Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jul 2023 4.01pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 09 Jul 23 4.16pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Is it a crime? The child was 17. I'm not condoning it - merely wondering the legality here

It's an odd law as whilst one can shag a 17 year old one can't take explicit pictures of them

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 09 Jul 23 5.13pm Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

I have said many, many times that the BBC and the Metropolitan police are riddled with Freemasonry, i have made a study of it, and to pardon the expression, Arse covering is the norm.

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Forest Hillbilly's Profile Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 09 Jul 23 5.26pm Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

i have some experience of Freemasonry. I considered it quite a moral-based organisation. To suggest the organisation itself was responsible/complicit in concealing/non-disclosure of evidence regarding this matter would not be my first thought. Rather, like-minded people have sought to preserve/enhance their careers or bank accounts.
The police are now assessing any evidence that might be available to them. I suspect any ar5e-covering will be done solely by the BBC,...again

 


"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 265 of 412 < 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)