Oh so when you were all in a flap about those at the vigil due to their 'illegal gathering during a pandemic' and 'breaking the law' that's fine, but when it's pointed out that others should also follow the rule of law that's 'pathetic virtue signalling'. All you show here is how abused that term can become to cover up for hypocrisy and lack of consistency or principle.

People have a right to be unhappy with this situation, and your muddled take on it hardly gives them a good reason not to.

Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2022 7.28pm)

Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2022 7.30pm)

It has been made clear that I don't condone rule breaking, I just don't consider it especially important in this case.
You keep mentioning the 'vigil,' which was more like a demo, like this is somehow relevant.
Its only significance in this conversation is that it implies that you supported it. You supported lawbreaking in a public place by hundreds of people in a pandemic, and yet you get your knickers in a twist about a few MPs having a drink behind closed doors.

Anyone would think that your outrage was entirely politically motivated.
I fully confess to my bias in that department. Why can't you?

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (19 Jan 2022 7.30pm)

Who are you inferring that I want in power? Certainly no party I see on the benches. You're just a confused that I'm not high fiving you over the nuts racial obsession you routinely p!ss all over this board, while also voting for Brexit. You can't get your head around it. Like I said, we're not all willing to look at the scarifies made by those missing out on seeing loved ones or going to their funerals, or sacrifices we all made, while laughing off this behaviour at the same time. Recognising that doesn't solely fall on political lines either. Your back of a fag packet analysis based on how you'd prefer people look at things is neither here nor there.

Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2022 7.47pm)

I mention it because it's both nuts in the way you convey it and routine to the point of illness, and in highlighting that fact, it's is one way of getting you to rein it in.

In any case, at the end of the day, I posted the odds of Boris going - an apolitical point of interest - while stating that he 'may' go, and that a downside may be that there is no obvious choice to replace him. You latched onto that unprompted with some ludicrous 'lefty' angle and want to endlessly harp on and panic at me about the prospect of Boris going. It will be what it will be, no matter how in a tizzy you get about it. If you keep pointlessly acting up, I can assure you, it will get you nowhere. Conversation over.

Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2022 8.03pm)

Shhhh.