You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Chris Richards
April 29 2024 6.34am

Chris Richards

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

 

View ex hibitionist's Profile ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 02 Feb 24 1.35pm Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

He was OK in midfield for a game or two but the cup game at home to Everton exposed how little he can give offensively, as a centre back he looks OK but every time he makes a mistake it seems to lead to a goal far too often, and as a right back the other night he answered the question why he was not put there earlier. Don't like to be negative but I think this is the one buy Vieira got wrong, his recruitment was excellent otherwise - he's had plenty of chances but I now regretfully have to conclude that he is poor, I prefer Riedewald.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View thai-eagle's Profile thai-eagle Flag chiang mai 02 Feb 24 1.57pm Send a Private Message to thai-eagle Add thai-eagle as a friend

Disagree! You are right about CR playing as a full back, but he is doing a good job both as central defender and midfielder. Hope he put Hughes on the bench with the American taking his place tomorrow. Guess Hodgson will not use the newcomers. Wharton probably a couple of games for Under 21 while our new right back must learn English before the boss plays him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Elpis's Profile Elpis Flag In a pub 02 Feb 24 1.59pm Send a Private Message to Elpis Add Elpis as a friend

He's fine as a squad player being able to fill in various positions to varying degrees of success .Obviously his best being CB where he is quite capable ,DM only when we park the bus and RB emergency cover only

Not sure what anyone expects from fringe players , if they were any better they would be playing week in week out .Basically we wont get anyone better to sit on the bench for long periods

 


And we still need a striker

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 02 Feb 24 2.00pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

He was OK in midfield for a game or two but the cup game at home to Everton exposed how little he can give offensively, as a centre back he looks OK but every time he makes a mistake it seems to lead to a goal far too often, and as a right back the other night he answered the question why he was not put there earlier. Don't like to be negative but I think this is the one buy Vieira got wrong, his recruitment was excellent otherwise - he's had plenty of chances but I now regretfully have to conclude that he is poor, I prefer Riedewald.

Perhaps I'll come across as a bit too prejudiced here but for all his athleticism, technical ability and commitment, I am beginning to see him as an American who perhaps doesn't understand football to the extent other players from around the globe instinctively will.

He still looks a bit lost and unsure sometimes. This can be perilous in the PL.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 02 Feb 24 2.01pm Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

He was OK in midfield for a game or two but the cup game at home to Everton exposed how little he can give offensively, as a centre back he looks OK but every time he makes a mistake it seems to lead to a goal far too often, and as a right back the other night he answered the question why he was not put there earlier. Don't like to be negative but I think this is the one buy Vieira got wrong, his recruitment was excellent otherwise - he's had plenty of chances but I now regretfully have to conclude that he is poor, I prefer Riedewald.


He is first and foremost a CB and has done that job well most of the time he's been called upon to play that role. What you are complaining about are the problems that occur when you put square pegs in round holes - something we have seen too much of this season.

Edited by doombear (02 Feb 2024 2.03pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View MrRobbo's Profile MrRobbo Flag Purley 02 Feb 24 2.18pm Send a Private Message to MrRobbo Add MrRobbo as a friend

IMO the criticism is a little unfair.

He's a CB first and foremost. Not as gifted on the ground as Marc, but bigger and better in the air. If we got a bid in for Anderson I'd have no issue in him stepping in to partner Marc.

Midfield and RB he is not. He's doing a job, and its not really his faut that he's trusted more to play out of position than e.g. Hughes.

The different positions require such different skills and positioning.

(hopefully people can stop asking for Anderson to be given a go in centre mid too)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Feb 24 2.27pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by MrRobbo

IMO the criticism is a little unfair.

He's a CB first and foremost. Not as gifted on the ground as Marc, but bigger and better in the air. If we got a bid in for Anderson I'd have no issue in him stepping in to partner Marc.

Midfield and RB he is not. He's doing a job, and its not really his faut that he's trusted more to play out of position than e.g. Hughes.

The different positions require such different skills and positioning.

(hopefully people can stop asking for Anderson to be given a go in centre mid too)

I would agree, and I reckon he's a decent enough centre back too. He's our third best but could improve with a bit more experience.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 02 Feb 24 2.30pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by MrRobbo

IMO the criticism is a little unfair.

He's a CB first and foremost. Not as gifted on the ground as Marc, but bigger and better in the air. If we got a bid in for Anderson I'd have no issue in him stepping in to partner Marc.

Midfield and RB he is not. He's doing a job, and its not really his faut that he's trusted more to play out of position than e.g. Hughes.

The different positions require such different skills and positioning.

(hopefully people can stop asking for Anderson to be given a go in centre mid too)

All very true.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CT Charlie's Profile CT Charlie Flag 02 Feb 24 9.02pm Send a Private Message to CT Charlie Add CT Charlie as a friend

Clearly as an American supporter I'm unable to understand the game as instinctively as others on this board. Nevertheless, to counter the criticism of a player who by his own admission and general agreement is a center back by profession, I raise this question: How do we think Guehi or Andersen would look if asked to play RB or DM?

I'll throw my apparently undersized hat in with the majority of you who acknowledge his ability and contributions. He was, after all, named Player of the Month last January in his first extended run. The next Virgil van Dijk? No, but he has served the club well.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View antipodeagle's Profile antipodeagle Flag Wellington 02 Feb 24 10.30pm Send a Private Message to antipodeagle Add antipodeagle as a friend

Originally posted by CT Charlie

Clearly as an American supporter I'm unable to understand the game as instinctively as others on this board. Nevertheless, to counter the criticism of a player who by his own admission and general agreement is a center back by profession, I raise this question: How do we think Guehi or Andersen would look if asked to play RB or DM?

I'll throw my apparently undersized hat in with the majority of you who acknowledge his ability and contributions. He was, after all, named Player of the Month last January in his first extended run. The next Virgil van Dijk? No, but he has served the club well.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EddieMac's Profile EddieMac Flag 02 Feb 24 10.53pm Send a Private Message to EddieMac Add EddieMac as a friend

He is an average enough player but he did get better after a few runs in midfield. It is very hard to grade him as he hasn’t played enough.

His biggest negative for me is his lack of composure on the ball.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 02 Feb 24 10.57pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by CT Charlie

Clearly as an American supporter I'm unable to understand the game as instinctively as others on this board. Nevertheless, to counter the criticism of a player who by his own admission and general agreement is a center back by profession, I raise this question: How do we think Guehi or Andersen would look if asked to play RB or DM?

I'll throw my apparently undersized hat in with the majority of you who acknowledge his ability and contributions. He was, after all, named Player of the Month last January in his first extended run. The next Virgil van Dijk? No, but he has served the club well.

I’m not sure if you mean that seriously Charlie but if so, and my post had any influence upon that statement, I’d just like to clarify that I was only and deliberately exposing my own prejudiced thinking there.

I make you right, and MrRobbo stated so quite competently, he does both play sporadically but also typically out of position.

I like Chris, i don’t doubt him with any sincerity. I’d put Hodgson in the blame for the aforementioned as I’m often under the impression he picks players/personalities in favour of more strategic thinking.

If Richards constantly played CM, Schlupp played on the wing and so on, we’d think they were terrible players. I thought it might also sincerely affect Ozoh vs Sheffield United as he seemed to come on under completely spontaneous instruction outside of his comfort zone.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Chris Richards