Bournemouth Accounts & FFP
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Y Ddraig Goch  In The Crowd 03 May 16 10.19am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Breached FFP and got a £7.5 Million fine. Worth it now that they are in the PL but seems more than a bit wrong
Posted an overall loss of £38Million. Not quite the plucky little minnows everyone thinks eh?
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Attachment: Midlands Eagle  03 May 16 11.39am |
|
|---|---|
|
Fines aren't much of a worry for clubs with wealthy owners who are willing to pay them and the only punishments that will work are docking points or transfer embargos
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 03 May 16 11.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Fines aren't much of a worry for clubs with wealthy owners who are willing to pay them and the only punishments that will work are docking points or transfer embargos I must admit I thought the default penalty for a breach of FFP was a transfer embargo
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Borussia Crystal Palace 03 May 16 11.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
You might want to check out Leicester's last season in the Championship (sorry to be a party pooper)...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Murray's the man round ear 03 May 16 12.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Borussia
You might want to check out Leicester's last season in the Championship (sorry to be a party pooper)... Leicester got away with it because they copied the Man City blueprint, of inventing a sponsorship smokescreen whereas Bournemouth didn't. Leicester have in other ways have shown this season money isn't everything. 5th lowest wage bill in the premier this season
Johnny will return |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| spartakev2 Anerley 03 May 16 12.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
And their net debt doubled last season to £40.3m Hardly a deterent to be fined £7.6m
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 03 May 16 3.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
I must admit I thought the default penalty for a breach of FFP was a transfer embargo I think it would be if they were still in the Championship, but the Football League can't impose a transfer ban on a Premier League team. They don't have to pay the fine either, like QPR tried, unless they're worried about relegation and getting kicked out of the football league.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
nairb75  Baltimore 03 May 16 4.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
josh harris needs to quit being cheap and give up the money like this russian fellow.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ambrose7 Croydon 03 May 16 4.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
I think it would be if they were still in the Championship, but the Football League can't impose a transfer ban on a Premier League team. They don't have to pay the fine either, like QPR tried, unless they're worried about relegation and getting kicked out of the football league. This is something the FL really needs to work on. At the moment, instead of punishing financial breaches, a situation has been created whereby clubs can massively gamble and for those that achieve promotion, they get away with it because they receive the impact that they can most handle. It's just as dangerous as it was beforehand as it makes the incentive for breaking the rules that much greater. Ideal situation would be PL and FL fair play schemes which run side by side to ensure punishments are consistent, even when clubs swap leagues.
26th January 2010 - Enter Administration |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 03 May 16 5.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
I think it would be if they were still in the Championship, but the Football League can't impose a transfer ban on a Premier League team. They don't have to pay the fine either, like QPR tried, unless they're worried about relegation and getting kicked out of the football league. It is madness, surely the FA should be the over arching authority?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 04 May 16 1.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ambrose7
This is something the FL really needs to work on. At the moment, instead of punishing financial breaches, a situation has been created whereby clubs can massively gamble and for those that achieve promotion, they get away with it because they receive the impact that they can most handle. It's just as dangerous as it was beforehand as it makes the incentive for breaking the rules that much greater. Ideal situation would be PL and FL fair play schemes which run side by side to ensure punishments are consistent, even when clubs swap leagues. It's more dangerous than before, you've got clubs spending £6m & £9m on a single player. Fulham spent £11m on one last year and didn't even come close to getting promoted.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 04 May 16 1.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
It is madness, surely the FA should be the over arching authority? But the FA don't want weak teams in the Premier League so they'd never impose a transfer ban on a newly promoted club, which is fair enough from their point of view. They broke the FL's rules too rather than the FA's.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.