Palace vs Burnley Match Thread
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Bangell  Oxford 05 Nov 16 2.02pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
PALACE XI: Mandanda; Ward, Dann (c), Delaney, Kelly; McArthur, Cabaye, Puncheon; Zaha, Townsend; Benteke. Subs: Hennessey, Fryers, Tomkins, Flamini, Ledley, Lee, Wickham. Burnley Football Club XI: Heaton (c); Lowton, Keane, Mee, Flanagan; Gudmundsson, Marney, Defour, Arfield, Hendrick; Vokes. Subs: Robinson, Tarkowski, Kightly, Boyd, Gray, Bamford, Barnes.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| askyourself 05 Nov 16 2.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Well, I'm glad that Punch is back (tin hat on). Delaney was unlucky to have been left out last time.
We move in the direction of our thoughts. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Y Ddraig Goch  In The Crowd 05 Nov 16 2.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Would like to have seen Tomkins start instead of Dammo
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cpj Kent 05 Nov 16 2.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Kelly again at left back. AP said yesterday that we don't have proper cover at left back so will probably need to get someone in in January. Surely he knew in August who he had for that position and he put Fryers in the squad based on his pre-season displays. If he's good enough, then play him; if he isn't, why wasn't this sorted out then? I see they've dispensed with their usual 442 and gone 451 - is that another tactic to stop our wingers? If so, I hope AP has anticipated it, or at least doesn't take 45 mins to change things if required. Edited by cpj (05 Nov 2016 2.14pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Asian Eagle  Cebu City 05 Nov 16 2.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Would have liked to see Fryers instead of Kelly, otherwise team is as good as can get. Edited by Asian Eagle (05 Nov 2016 2.21pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MKCPFC Spain/MK 05 Nov 16 2.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
That's our best 11 starting IMO, let's hope they play for 90 minutes.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Painter Croydon 05 Nov 16 2.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
Would like to have seen Tomkins start instead of Dammo Why?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Bullhorn76 Darlington 05 Nov 16 2.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Painter
Why? I second this motion ⬆️
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
grumpymort  US/Thailand/UK 05 Nov 16 2.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Painter
Why? Simple he is better. Back to the standard favourites now then. Would of prefered to see him keep Tomkins/Lee in and give Fryers a chance. If Lee is used correctly just behind striker he does a job. Hopefully we will win this a draw at the minimum.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| phillanth London 05 Nov 16 2.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Happy with this line up too - lets see what happens! COYP
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 05 Nov 16 2.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Painter
Why? Two reasons, first the obvious one,I just think he is currently better. Secondly, Tomkins and Dann need to build a partnership, that won't happen with Tomkins getting splinters in his Arse.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| palace chick South Croydon 05 Nov 16 2.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Painter
Why? We don't have time for Tomkins and Dann to learn how to play together as a pairing. They were both below par last week and didn't look good together. We know Dann and Delaney work, so until the other two sort it out, this is the best we have?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.