This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote DanH at 28 May 2014 1.37pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 28 May 2014 1.19pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 1.08pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 12.03am
There isn't really any provable evidence against him as far as I can tell. Its not about proving, its about establishing whether reasonable doubt exists.
Edited by DanH (28 May 2014 1.37pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 1.19pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 1.08pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 12.03am
There isn't really any provable evidence against him as far as I can tell. Its not about proving, its about establishing whether reasonable doubt exists. It amounts to the same thing. If you prove something then reasonable doubt doesn't remain. If you can't prove something then doubt always remains. There has to be sufficent evidence presented to establish that there is a case to answer. It doesn't look good for Rolfy, what with the whole secret relationship, incriminating letters, several other cases showing a pattern and essentially admitting to 'inappropriate touching' as being 'touchy feely person'. Shame, because I met him a few years back, and he seemed a lovely guy. Had a couple of drinks with him and his wife in the Zen Garden in Maidenhead, and chatted about art. I really want him to be not guilty, but its not looking good.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 4.06pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 1.19pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 1.08pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 12.03am
There isn't really any provable evidence against him as far as I can tell. Its not about proving, its about establishing whether reasonable doubt exists. It amounts to the same thing. If you prove something then reasonable doubt doesn't remain. If you can't prove something then doubt always remains. There has to be sufficent evidence presented to establish that there is a case to answer. It doesn't look good for Rolfy, what with the whole secret relationship, incriminating letters, several other cases showing a pattern and essentially admitting to 'inappropriate touching' as being 'touchy feely person'. Shame, because I met him a few years back, and he seemed a lovely guy. Had a couple of drinks with him and his wife in the Zen Garden in Maidenhead, and chatted about art. I really want him to be not guilty, but its not looking good.
I think he should be returned not guilty from what I've heard anyway......I think he's a victim of our current hysteria over the shady culture of the past.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Seems to be based on hearsay without a great deal of corroboration. What happened about the indecent images on his PC?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 4.16pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 4.06pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 1.19pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 1.08pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 12.03am
There isn't really any provable evidence against him as far as I can tell. Its not about proving, its about establishing whether reasonable doubt exists. It amounts to the same thing. If you prove something then reasonable doubt doesn't remain. If you can't prove something then doubt always remains. There has to be sufficent evidence presented to establish that there is a case to answer. It doesn't look good for Rolfy, what with the whole secret relationship, incriminating letters, several other cases showing a pattern and essentially admitting to 'inappropriate touching' as being 'touchy feely person'. Shame, because I met him a few years back, and he seemed a lovely guy. Had a couple of drinks with him and his wife in the Zen Garden in Maidenhead, and chatted about art. I really want him to be not guilty, but its not looking good.
I think he should be returned not guilty from what I've heard anyway......I think he's a victim of our current hysteria over the shady culture of the past. Circumstancial evidence can be very damning, if for example you stated to the police when you made a statement that 'you didn't know the person', for example, and then they prove that you did. Problem with sex offences, is that its always going to come down to allegation vs defence. Usually if you can put someone somewhere, at a specific time, when they said they were elsewhere, their alibi and defence becomes unreliable: and when you're in a case thats your word vs theirs, that can be damning. He wouldn't be the first person to be found guilty on the basis of sufficent circumstantial evidence shredding a defence. Or because a number of independent cases of people making accusations. That letter essentially apologising, that could damn him. I suspect he'll dodge the rape charges, and get done for indecent assault, and get a couple of years.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Quote Cucking Funt at 28 May 2014 4.18pm
Seems to be based on hearsay without a great deal of corroboration. What happened about the indecent images on his PC? The indecent images charges would likely be heard seperately.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Could Rolf have done a better pic ?
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 4.06pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 1.19pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 May 2014 1.08pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 28 May 2014 12.03am
There isn't really any provable evidence against him as far as I can tell. Its not about proving, its about establishing whether reasonable doubt exists. It amounts to the same thing. If you prove something then reasonable doubt doesn't remain. If you can't prove something then doubt always remains. There has to be sufficent evidence presented to establish that there is a case to answer. It doesn't look good for Rolfy, what with the whole secret relationship, incriminating letters, several other cases showing a pattern and essentially admitting to 'inappropriate touching' as being 'touchy feely person'. Shame, because I met him a few years back, and he seemed a lovely guy. Had a couple of drinks with him and his wife in the Zen Garden in Maidenhead, and chatted about art. I really want him to be not guilty, but its not looking good. art and pron are very close relatives. Perhaps it is subjective as to whether thrusting your hand between the legs of a minor is perverted, or perhaps an emotive expression of societies Freudian 'hang-ups'
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Cucking Funt at 28 May 2014 4.18pm
Seems to be based on hearsay without a great deal of corroboration. What happened about the indecent images on his PC?
Edited by johnno42000 (28 May 2014 8.38pm)
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote Cucking Funt at 28 May 2014 4.18pm
Seems to be based on hearsay without a great deal of corroboration. What happened about the indecent images on his PC?
This is getting serious now.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote johnno42000 at 28 May 2014 7.51pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 28 May 2014 4.18pm
Seems to be based on hearsay without a great deal of corroboration. What happened about the indecent images on his PC?
When the time comes, I want die just like my Dad - at peace and asleep. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This is getting silly like PPI claims now. There needs to be a cutoff. Maybe a TV advert that says "Were you abused by a celebrity in the 70s? You have until December 2014 to come forward. After that we are writing off that decade and only claims from 1980 onwards will be considered". If they don't do this then how can criminals ever rest easy that they'll never get caught?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.