This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by YT
Absolute sh!te! TAA?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
No, it’s the players. Despite their experience and skill, the fear of defeat is greater than their desire to win. For phuck sake run at the opponents not run it back across your defensive line. And what was Pickford doing coming to the half way line to take a free kick only to pass it 5 yards to Walker to kick it out of play?! What you are saying here in the first part is what attitude the players should have and that is entirely under the direction of the manager. The players in the England team are more than capable of winning the tournament.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Painter
TAA? I meant the whole team but, yes, he was particularly bad as was Rice. I wonder if it's too late for Rice to change his preferred nationality again.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Guehi was England's best player. Andersen good for Denmark too. Unfortunately Eze looked lost. Not sure what was going on there.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Guehi was England's best player. Andersen good for Denmark too. Unfortunately Eze looked lost. Not sure what was going on there. I’d suggest there’s two reasons Eze looked lost: 1. He’s not a LW. Our midfield was near absent today. The ball kept going loose in the middle and there was never anybody from our side near it. As a result, there was no flow through our team, we only ever got forward when somebody charged solitary with the ball. Eze, Foden, Saka, Bowen, Kane, Watkins, Bellingham. All these players will look quite uninspired and ordinary if we have no plan to move the ball forward and rely upon them to single-handedly create something in the inevitable tactical vacuum. Southgate is not a football manager.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
I’d suggest there’s two reasons Eze looked lost: 1. He’s not a LW. Our midfield was near absent today. The ball kept going loose in the middle and there was never anybody from our side near it. As a result, there was no flow through our team, we only ever got forward when somebody charged solitary with the ball. Eze, Foden, Saka, Bowen, Kane, Watkins, Bellingham. All these players will look quite uninspired and ordinary if we have no plan to move the ball forward and rely upon them to single-handedly create something in the inevitable tactical vacuum. Southgate is not a football manager. I thought Eze was largely playing left inside forward for us under Glasner - that was what I presumed he was picked for. Maybe I'm wrong as I obviously don't have our tactical plan. He could be a roaming playmaker or something like that. I agree on the tactics unfortunately. I don't know where to start on that. The basics first and then work from there. Something I haven't seen mentioned is that it seems to me that literally everyone now plays with a back three. Then we keep on coming out and saying how hard it is to play against a back three. I would think that there are two options: two advanced up front - or play with a back three yourself if it's that effective.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
England, the tournament favorites, marching on unbeaten! (Because not one of them seem to be able to run, let alone pass forward)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
I’d suggest there’s two reasons Eze looked lost: 1. He’s not a LW. Our midfield was near absent today. The ball kept going loose in the middle and there was never anybody from our side near it. As a result, there was no flow through our team, we only ever got forward when somebody charged solitary with the ball. Eze, Foden, Saka, Bowen, Kane, Watkins, Bellingham. All these players will look quite uninspired and ordinary if we have no plan to move the ball forward and rely upon them to single-handedly create something in the inevitable tactical vacuum. Southgate is not a football manager. I wouldn't say they have performed well in a couple of tournaments , they performed OK , beat teams they were supposed to beat and didn't against anyone half decent . I would agree Southgate is not a football manager
|
|
|
Originally posted by BeckenhamSteve
I have to agree with this. It sounds ridiculous to make comparisons between Palace and England but when Glasner took over from Hodgson he invigorated our squad and got us playing a much more aggressive and attacking game. This reminds me of how England are playing right now and we all know what happened next. Southgate is so negative and passive when we have such a wonderful bunch of players that should be setting this tournament alight but we're going to miss out yet again. Can you imagine what Glasner would get out of this squad! Edited by BeckenhamSteve (20 Jun 2024 8.58pm) Indeed, we have seen first hand how a different system and tactics can change a team. (A team that still included Hughes and Clyne). We know the players are good enough, we see them every week. Hopefully the press now can get out of Southgate's backside, and realise we've been playing with a hand break for a while now.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
A dreadful,lacklustre, lethargic performance from England.They looked totally devoid of any organisation and ideas.A dearth of movement, surrendering possession, players not playing in their best positions. I am not a highly paid manager, but it seems obvious to me playing Tripper at left back, means we have no attack down the left as he doesnt overlap and cross a ball, as he has to cut back. So whoever plays left wing has no support, Mitchell would be a better option. Why play a right back in midfield, who just walks around and gives the ball away constantly. They have obviously had to tactic to press the opposition as they think they are too good to do that.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Elpis
Southgate " we have never really replaced Calvin Phillips" Will someone at the FA just drag this idiot somewhere he wont be found for the next month .Never had a clue as a club manager and is exposed at international level time and time again . Just not good enough,Ive enjoyed every other game Ive watched but this was just pony and million miles away from Spain V Italy Im watching now . Spot on.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Painter
I am not a highly paid manager, but it seems obvious to me playing Tripper at left back, means we have no attack down the left as he doesnt overlap and cross a ball, as he has to cut back. So whoever plays left wing has no support, Mitchell would be a better option. Why play a right back in midfield, who just walks around and gives the ball away constantly. They have obviously had to tactic to press the opposition as they think they are too good to do that.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.