This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The bottom line is that we have had the referendum already. All of them eventually. It is in the nature of people to become dissatisfied with the existing circumstances. The difference is that we haven't even left the EU yet, so no one is in a position to judge the effects. Of course, some of us didn't just vote to line our own pockets and when have you ever heard a farmer happy about anything? I am surprised that any farmers voted to leave. To me they are the natural constituents for the Remain camp. All that lovely free money they get versus the uncertainty of post Brexit funding. However they are just one part of our country albeit an important one.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
To repeat. I previously provided a link, which by the way wasn’t from one of your proscribed sources, and you dismissed it.
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I am surprised that any farmers voted to leave. To me they are the natural constituents for the Remain camp. All that lovely free money they get versus the uncertainty of post Brexit funding. However they are just one part of our country albeit an important one. Well obviously, its supporting local produce and ensuring a sustainable farming industry, unless you're in the camp of flooding the UK with cheap low quality produce and running our own industries into the ground? Taking back control equals passing more our wealth out of the country? Never ceases to amaze me the raft of negative things leavers knowingly voted for with no positive balancer
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I am surprised that any farmers voted to leave. To me they are the natural constituents for the Remain camp. All that lovely free money they get versus the uncertainty of post Brexit funding. However they are just one part of our country albeit an important one. I doubt many would prefer to carry on under CAP, even tough it's been revised over the years, the subsidy system is deeply flawed and I'm not surprised farmers voted leave.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Well obviously, its supporting local produce and ensuring a sustainable farming industry, unless you're in the camp of flooding the UK with cheap low quality produce and running our own industries into the ground? Taking back control equals passing more our wealth out of the country? Never ceases to amaze me the raft of negative things leavers knowingly voted for with no positive balancer You mean like Prince Charles’ farm produce?
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
I doubt many would prefer to carry on under CAP, even tough it's been revised over the years, the subsidy system is deeply flawed and I'm not surprised farmers voted leave. Farmers voted to not have subsidies? What do they get in return for the subsidies they give up?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
I'm not saying that, I just dislike lazy retorts and throw away remarks to discredit a good debate where one has presented a credible article to support their argument Just accept its a goal for our side and try and find an equaliser Edited by Pussay Patrol (17 Apr 2019 10.34am)
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Farmers voted to not have subsidies? What do they get in return for the subsidies they give up? The current system is acreage based, so not eco friendly at all.
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
The current system is acreage based, so not eco friendly at all. Why would a business want less income?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Why would a business want less income? Do you really know nothing about this?
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
Do you really know nothing about this? Yes I need to understand how farmers are better off without subsidies
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Yes I need to understand how farmers are better off without subsidies 80% of subsidies are paid to 20% of farmers. Small farms don’t receive much whereas the Queen receives around €500,000.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Yes I need to understand how farmers are better off without subsidies The CAP system pays out on acreage, including land not being farmed, so cut down a hedgerow and get more subsidy. Replaced by direct payments based on environmental standards.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
80% of subsidies are paid to 20% of farmers. Small farms don’t receive much whereas the Queen receives around €500,000. ...and you don't even have to live in the country where the subsidised land is - just own some land there.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
The CAP system pays out on acreage, including land not being farmed, so cut down a hedgerow and get more subsidy. Replaced by direct payments based on environmental standards. So farmers are financially better off not having them?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
The CAP system pays out on acreage, including land not being farmed, so cut down a hedgerow and get more subsidy. Replaced by direct payments based on environmental standards. Except that the Single Farm Payment has environmental requirements and you lose payment if those are not adhered to. Cutting a hedgerow would almost inevitably mean losing payments. In addition, currently over a quarter of payments are not on Hectares but are directly linked to rural development initiatives. You may have seen the widening of hedgerows for example. We can do better than the CAP no doubt. That would be better done within wider EU reform. But farmers are now realising they can't expect much after 2017 when the transition period finishes.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
That hypocritical comment from Sydney Sound Bite had me laughing all day
|
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
You don’t. You have a full on Orwellian complex. I’m yet to see one post where you don’t in some way crowbar in your fully observable facts and dress them up as sagely tellings that no one else has seen. Mix in a bit of chicken little, a tin hat, sandwich board and some bud, and we’re there. Again. For the 456 millionth time. I’m waiting for the post that attempts to link a palace result to the global financial crisis.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.