This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Brilliant from Trump. [Tweet Link]You really watch that and think Acosta is the unprofessional and rude one?
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
You really watch that and think Acosta is the unprofessional and rude one?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
is it fake news? Maybe it's a hologram of Trump?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Well done that reporter, Acosta, never lost his professionalism. And a complete pain in the arse to Trump. Trump tried to get rid of him as he did not want to admit he had said 'an invasion' but it backfired as the other reporter then supported Acosta, whereupon Acosta resumed where he left off !!!! The USA system is totally flawed with its concentration of power into one individual. ???????? You're have frequently made statements showing contempt for the democratic process when it goes against your ideas. You show support for the EU....which places near total power in an unelected commission. As for the US system.....what on earth are you talking about?....The US president's power is checked significantly by two......frigging two separate sets of politicians. A politician has to be popular enough with the electorate to win both houses to even get their agenda though without significantly compromising.....and that's only for two years until they face another election that can alter that power dyamanic. So what are you suggesting?.....that people should have a national election and vote for a president without the power of implementing any agenda?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
You really watch that and think Acosta is the unprofessional and rude one? You've obviously not seen Jim Acosta speak to press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders most days. The great thing about Trump is he fights back to the rude journalists who use the cameras to grandstand.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Well done that reporter, Acosta, never lost his professionalism. And a complete pain in the arse to Trump. Trump tried to get rid of him as he did not want to admit he had said 'an invasion' but it backfired as the other reporter then supported Acosta, whereupon Acosta resumed where he left off !!!! The USA system is totally flawed with its concentration of power into one individual. Never lost his professionalism? So refusing to hand his mic back to a White House aide and continually shouting at the President is being professional? Flawed? Why don't you have a read of the US Constitution and come back to me...
|
|
|
Just seen the BBC story reporting that Acosta has had his credentials taken away by the White House. The tweets they post up about the incident all support Acosta. They couldn't find one person that didn't. Funny that! [Link] Acosta denies touching the intern, yet when right-wing commentator Paul Joseph Watson produces a zoomed-in version, they discredit him as a "right-wing conspiracy theorist" and apparently "observers" say his clip was doctored. Funny how the BBC doesn't name the observers or show even show the clip... [Tweet Link]
I just love objective journalism from the BBC! Edited by Penge Eagle (08 Nov 2018 11.44am)
|
|
|
Aren't you a journalist? Do you not get offended that Trump tries to discredit and bring your entire industry into disrepute?
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Aren't you a journalist? Do you not get offended that Trump tries to discredit and bring your entire industry into disrepute? Listen, respect works both ways. Sarah Huckabee is never rude to Jim Acosta and is always professional. Part of the problem is the press briefings are televised so Acosta always goes for his 'big moment' to grandstand to make great viewing for CNN and their ratings. Trump refers to the bad journalism and most Americans agree with him on this. The ONLY people who are offended are the left-wing hacks. Yes I am a journalist which is why I get so pissed off with activism in the industry from so-called impartial journalists and media outlets. Like the BBC and CNN. How many more examples of the media bias can I give? I could bore you with negative stories on the Democrats the media refuses to publish or positive stories on the Republicans... As a journalist, I would have posted up a 50-50 split of tweets (for and against) and also posted the so-called doctored clip after independently verifying it. I would have also mentioned Acosta is known as a firebrand in the press corp and has clashed with the WH many times before. It's all about balanced reporting. Regarding Trump's personality. Yes he gives as good as he gets but it's what voters wanted. For many years, Republicans have had the likes of Mitt Romney and John McCain – who are genuinely nice people – but have had had nasty names and viscous accusations slung at them and got nowhere. They kept losing. Republicans decided to vote in a brash reality TV personality who won't take this nonsense and, more importantly, actually wins. Edited by Penge Eagle (08 Nov 2018 12.03pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
This is the USA system of Gerry-mandering by the Republican Party. 'But some were left questioning why Democrats suffered a series of setbacks that prevented the party from picking up even more seats and, perhaps most consequentially, left the US Senate in Republican hands. Among the most eye-catching was a statistic showing Democrats led Republicans by more than 12 million votes in Senate races, and yet still suffered losses on the night and failed to win a majority of seats in the chamber. In the presidential vote in 2016 Mrs.Clinton got 3 million more votes than Trump. Of course in the USA everybody is equal, it is just that republicans are more equal than others. I can think of only one developed democratic country that elects leaders based upon the number of votes they get. France. Trump won despite having the vast majority of media constantly attacking him. Trump won despite being out spent massively by the democrats. Trump won because the democrats are too far left to keep enough of the white working class vote.....you know that 'gammon' who you love so much. The democrats don't deserve to be in power. I'll say it once again Steely.....you aren't interested in democracy....you support the EU with its unelected commission that can't be voted out. So spare us. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Nov 2018 12.52pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
This is the USA system of Gerry-mandering by the Republican Party. 'But some were left questioning why Democrats suffered a series of setbacks that prevented the party from picking up even more seats and, perhaps most consequentially, left the US Senate in Republican hands. Among the most eye-catching was a statistic showing Democrats led Republicans by more than 12 million votes in Senate races, and yet still suffered losses on the night and failed to win a majority of seats in the chamber. In the presidential vote in 2016 Mrs.Clinton got 3 million more votes than Trump. Of course in the USA everybody is equal, it is just that republicans are more equal than others. Why don't you ever do some research before you post? Google: 'The United States Electoral College' which was established by the United States Constitution.
|
|
|
Clinton only getting 3 million more votes than Trump is a joke considering the demographic reality of America. Here's the mid term votes broken down by race. Here's why the future of the US....unless they radically change tact is going to be permanently blue....permanently democrat.....until such time that it's no longer a democracy.....and ignoring the civil war that's probably coming.....as peaceful secession is unlikely to be accepted. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Nov 2018 1.02pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Democrats got millions more votes – so how did Republicans win the Senate?' Experts warn of ‘rise of minority rule’ after Democrats’ vote tally beat Republicans’ by more than 12m
The democrat's voting base is mainly centred in cities and the coast.....Hmmmm....I wonder why...real head scratcher that one. The republicans are mainly....but not exclusively centred in rural areas......Hmmmm....I wonder why. I've already stated how the future is permanently democratic due to demographics. The democrats have existed within the US electoral system since they started so you waffling on about popular votes is moot. That's not how the US or indeed how democratic systems work....as I say outside of France.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What gets me is the total lack of respect Trump gets from the media. He is the President for god sake. He might be unpresidential in his approach but he has never been in office. He has his own individual style. No President has ever received the disrespect that Trump has. Quite simply it is very hard to show respect for someone that is always pugnacious, picking fights for his own personal gain, and deeply self-centred. He does not have any morals. I find the idea of respecting 'the office' extraordinarily old fashioned. People respect others because of what they do and say nowadays. Trump has chosen to divide his nation. That is completely clear. It's amazing the impact one man can have, albeit he must have been pushing at an open door.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
Why don't you ever do some research before you post? Google: 'The United States Electoral College' which was established by the United States Constitution.
The idea of the college was that you voted for a local man of standing in the community. Better a man who travels around the country and may even know of the candidates. You are entrusting this man to familiarise himself with the candidates and vote on your behalf. Of course as it evolved the parties would push their local man as the guy you should vote for to the college and so vote for their presidential candidate. There is an argument that the Electoral college should be replaced with a simple majority vote however changing the constitution is notoriously difficult and I suspect that most Americans aren't that bothered.
One more point |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.